What's new

Sena hits out at Katju for saying awarding Bharat Ratna to Tendulkar a disgrace to country

Maybe I'm stupid, but I'd never bestow the honour on that man. Never.

Then indded u are stupid or u have no idea of contribution of that man.
U are comparing a person who kept india united at a critical time to a stupid cricketer who is embarassing everyone with his conduct:mad:

Actually he is right...............NEHRU should have been given Bharat Nikala rather than Bharat Ratna.

Don't agree.........sorry
 
Then indded u are stupid or u have no idea of contribution of that man.
U are comparing a person who kept india united at a critical time to a stupid cricketer who is embarassing everyone with his conduct:mad:



Don't agree.........sorry

Yeah? How exactly did he keep the unity of India at a critical time? Dare i need to remind you he was all for partition? And what about his gallant leadership in 1962 and introduction of dynastic politics in the new Republic?
 
Maybe '62 or him being the father of entire KASHMIR ISSUE should change your mind.

But I am ok with it.

To each his own but he held us together,,,,at least he was a nationalist.
Ya sure he was not the brightest chap around

And sachin??

Yeah? How exactly did he keep the unity of India at a critical time? Dare i need to remind you he was all for partition? And what about his gallant leadership in 1962 and introduction of dynastic politics in the new Republic?

As i said u are just wrong.
Now u can go and worship ur god tendulkar.......:coffee:

For evading taxes,,,being an arsehole with 3 pc attendance at rajya sabha,,,selling a ferrari he got for free.

And how the **** did nehru introduce dynastic politics??u are just a biased person here.
He was atleast a nationalist and honest person.

Look what happened to pakistan without a tall leader like jinnah,we would have gone the same way:coffee:
 
NATIONALIST???? :rofl:

He & Gandhi were hand in glove for Partitioning the sub-continent.

Also, Congress chose Patel as the first PM with huge majority, Nehru wanted Power for himself & rest is history.

Atleast Sachin hasn't done anything bad for nation if not good.

And u think partition was bad for us??
Wow,awesome thoughts:lol::lol:

Without partition muslims would make 40% of our population,good luck with that:lol:
 
To each his own but he held us together,,,,at least he was a nationalist.
Ya sure he was not the brightest chap around

And sachin??



As i said u are just wrong.
Now u can go and worship ur god tendulkar.......:coffee:

For evading taxes,,,being an arsehole with 3 pc attendance at rajya sabha,,,selling a ferrari he got for free.

And how the **** did nehru introduce dynastic politics??u are just a biased person here.
He was atleast a nationalist and honest person.

Look what happened to pakistan without a tall leader like jinnah,we would have gone the same way:coffee:

Who said Tendulkar is my God? He's the best cricketer of his generation, and like the best musicians of their generation have received the Bharat Ratna, he too has received the recognition.

And you'd bestow the Bharat Ratna for someone who usurped power for himself, and worse, was ready to partition his country for the sake of power. To someone who ignored our Nation's defence that ultimately resulted in a virtual rout in 62. To someone who ignored criticism and basked in the congratulations of his cronies. For all his efforts, what exactly did Non-alignment achieve? What exactly did socialistic License Raj achieve?

And what honesty are you talking about? What exactly was he honest about? His affairs with Edwina Mountbatten?:coffee:
 
Ok, if the OBJECTIVE of Partition was to remove the Muslim population, why are they still making the largest muslim concentration anywhere in the world in India?

Why was Gandhi Fasting so that Muslims don't leave India?

Gandhi-Nehru were playing DUAL GAMES.

Its not as simple as u proclaim to be.
Muslims were adamant at the time,especially the people of now bangladesh..........

There were riots etc and this was simply the best thing to do,there was no option.

I i said earlier,u cannot doubt the integrity of nehru,,he may be foolish but was patriotic
 
we should avoid posting such threads on this forum, those are not related to Indian defence.
 
Who said Tendulkar is my God? He's the best cricketer of his generation, and like the best musicians of their generation have received the Bharat Ratna, he too has received the recognition.

And you'd bestow the Bharat Ratna for someone who usurped power for himself, and worse, was ready to partition his country for the sake of power. To someone who ignored our Nation's defence that ultimately resulted in a virtual rout in 62. To someone who ignored criticism and basked in the congratulations of his cronies. For all his efforts, what exactly did Non-alignment achieve? What exactly did socialistic License Raj achieve?

And what honesty are you talking about? What exactly was he honest about? His affairs with Edwina Mountbatten?:coffee:

U are not fit enough for a debate.
Read a few more conspiracy theories and move on.

There are lot of ppl like u with a single dimensional thinking,,,world is not like that.
People make mistakes

we should avoid posting such threads on this forum, those are not related to Indian defence.

I agree,,,sorry won't post it next time:D
 
This uproar over mere attendance seems a bit unnecessary. Sachin did not violated an law. His leave was granted by his higher authority. How come suddenly it becomes a disqualifying criteria for granting Bharat Ratna who served his country more than twenty years with excellence? Come on, he served his country in a fine manner and made us proud. We can debate if he deserves it or not but we can not say he should not be awarded because of his poor attendance in Rajya Sabha.
 
This uproar over mere attendance seems a bit unnecessary. Sachin did not violated an law. His leave was granted by his higher authority. How come suddenly it becomes a disqualifying criteria for granting Bharat Ratna who served his country more than twenty years with excellence? Come on, he served his country in a fine manner and made us proud. We can debate if he deserves it or not but we can not say he should not be awarded because of his poor attendance in Rajya Sabha.

There is no service to the nation.....it was for money.
He is a professional player,not someone like dhyan chand.
 
U are not fit enough for a debate.
Read a few more conspiracy theories and move on.

There are lot of ppl like u with a single dimensional thinking,,,world is not like that.
People make mistakes



I agree,,,sorry won't post it next time:D

Where was the debate? You did not refute a single point of mine, nor did you come up with any evidence that would make me eat my own words. All you did was heap opprobrium on Sachin for minor transgressions and chose to look away at the major transgressions of Nehru.

At least tell us why you think Nehru was Nationalistic and honest. At least prove your own points instead of disproving mine.:lol:
 
There is no service to the nation.....it was for money.
He is a professional player,not someone like dhyan chand.
Depends how you look at at it. None of his contemporaries and colleagues believe that he "played for money", questioning his patriotism is ridiculous to the core. This debate goes nowhere as there will always a scope for disagreement (just as you are doing in case of Nehru) if a person deserves an award or not. What I am saying is disqualifying him just because of his attendance now is mere stupidity.
 
Where was the debate? You did not refute a single point of mine, nor did you come up with any evidence that would make me eat my own words. All you did was heap opprobrium on Sachin for minor transgressions and chose to look away at the major transgressions of Nehru.

At least tell us why you think Nehru was Nationalistic and honest. At least prove your own points instead of disproving mine.:lol:

I need not do anything,,,indians are well indians.
After this bjp elections all i can see are smitten people rooting for a party forgetting everything else.

We call such people fanboys

Depends how you look at at it. None of his contemporaries and colleagues believe that he "played for money", questioning his patriotism is ridiculous to the core. This debate goes nowhere as there will always a scope for disagreement (just as you are doing in case of Nehru) if a person deserves an award or not. What I am saying is disqualifying him just because of his attendance now is mere stupidity.

Once again a guy is playing for money..............where is the service to the nation here??
And nehru had some contribution in early formative years of india,even in freedom struggle.

Ur wish to not even acknowledge that,,pretty shocking
 
I need not do anything,,,indians are well indians.
After this bjp elections all i can see are smitten people rooting for a party forgetting everything else.

We call such people fanboys

So any person who says Nehru did not deserve the Bharat Ratna and provides a set of reasons for his opinions is a BJP fanboy? :lol: Dude, stop making a fool of yourself in every thread!
 

Back
Top Bottom