What's new

Terrorists kill 2 bank guards in Kashmir

Since when bank robbers are called terrorists? Isn't the common mission of these poor fellows to protect the bank property?
lol, who said they robbed the bank? better luck next time.
 
What peace are you talking about man? If India had wanted peace, it would've negotiated with the Kashmiris. But instead, it oppressed them ruthlessly.

https://www.voanews.com/a/kashmir-viral-videos-deepens-anger-at-india/3826071.html

View attachment 442375

The option is open for the Kashmiris to drop the gun and join the democratic process and peaceful demonstrations if at all.
Violence and vandalism will lead to more violence against them and in the process lose any sympathy the rest of India has for Kashmiris.
Remember, this is the battle between the wishes of 1.2 billion people vs a few million Kashmiris (if Pakistani propoganda is to be believed). At the end of the day, our army and govt has the support of the common indian, be it Hindu or Muslim.

It’s an uphill task for the Kashmiri, esp since India is in a position of strength and really does not need to negotiate anything!
So the only option for Kashmiris is to appeal to the common indian and their current behavior does not garner any sympathy from majority of Indians.
 
We have sympathy for the freedom fighters of Kashmir who are struggling against the oppression of India.
I have no sympathy for the Indian state sponsored terrorism in Kashmir.
You guys don't have to mention where your sympathies are,rest of the world knows it that's why you guys get special treatment when you flash your passport.
 
Poor guards RIP
Must have been India Army that robbed the bank. Corruption in India is a big problem.
Are you really resorting to preschool level finger pointing?
IA rob a bank? Darth Vader personally cutting them down would've made a better argument :coffee:
 
You guys don't have to mention where your sympathies are,rest of the world knows it that's why you guys get special treatment when you flash your passport.

The world also knows about the criminal activities of India and Israel, but the lack of action due to politics doesn't mean that it makes it all legal or humane. History is littered with such wretched instances of states transgressing human rights with impunity. Germany did that. Japan did that. America did that.

Your attempts to justify your state's wickedness is proof enough that it affects Indians at some level.

The option is open for the Kashmiris to drop the gun and join the democratic process and peaceful demonstrations if at all.
Violence and vandalism will lead to more violence against them and in the process lose any sympathy the rest of India has for Kashmiris.
Remember, this is the battle between the wishes of 1.2 billion people vs a few million Kashmiris (if Pakistani propoganda is to be believed). At the end of the day, our army and govt has the support of the common indian, be it Hindu or Muslim.

It’s an uphill task for the Kashmiri, esp since India is in a position of strength and really does not need to negotiate anything!
So the only option for Kashmiris is to appeal to the common indian and their current behavior does not garner any sympathy from majority of Indians.

Indians have no sympathy for Kashmiri people. They only want their land. If you think that there is no example of a people breaking free from a powerful occupation, then I would suggest you should have a look at a history book.

The path is now set. Sooner or later, Kashmir will free itself from India.
 
The world also knows about the criminal activities of India and Israel, but the lack of action due to politics doesn't mean that it makes it all legal or humane. History is littered with such wretched instances of states transgressing human rights with impunity. Germany did that. Japan did that. America did that.

Your attempts to justify your state's wickedness is proof enough that it affects Indians at some level.



Indians have no sympathy for Kashmiri people. They only want their land. If you think that there is no example of a people breaking free from a powerful occupation, then I would suggest you should have a look at a history book.

The path is now set. Sooner or later, Kashmir will free itself from India.
People can break free if they don't want anything to do with us.
Land stays.
 
People can break free if they don't want anything to do with us.
Land stays.

You just proved the point of the Kashmiri people. Land belongs to the people of Kashmir. People of Kashmir stay. Land of Kashmir stays. India and Indians go.
 
People can break free if they don't want anything to do with us.
Land stays.
They don't care about people it's the land ,that's what it is all about ,they want as much land as they can get ,they talk about people but when it comes to helping them or taking them they won't .
 
You just proved the point of the Kashmiri people. Land belongs to the people of Kashmir. People of Kashmir stay. Land of Kashmir stays. India and Indians go.
When your lease with the landlord ends and you move out, do you take the whole apartment with you?
Kashmiris won't get the land. It belongs to 1.2 Bil Indians and you have to consider their wishes too.
 
You just proved the point of the Kashmiri people. Land belongs to the people of Kashmir. People of Kashmir stay. Land of Kashmir stays. India and Indians go.
If land belongs to kashmiries then kiskay dada ka mal soch kar Pakistan China Koh day diya

The world also knows about the criminal activities of India and Israel, but the lack of action due to politics doesn't mean that it makes it all legal or humane. History is littered with such wretched instances of states transgressing human rights with impunity. Germany did that. Japan did that. America did that.

Your attempts to justify your state's wickedness is proof enough that it affects Indians at some level.
Bro there are 53 muslim countries bro.gro a pair bro
 
When your lease with the landlord ends and you move out, do you take the whole apartment with you?
Kashmiris won't get the land. It belongs to 1.2 Bil Indians and you have to consider their wishes too.

Firstly, Kashmir never belonged to India. it was a separate state which even got special status under the puppets who signed the accession to India.

Secondly, does Delhi belong to Delhiites, or is it leased? Who made Delhiites part owners of Kashmir, but Kashmiri people became tenants of Kashmir? The fate Kashmir is decided by Kashmiri people and they will get their independence from India.

If land belongs to kashmiries then kiskay dada ka mal soch kar Pakistan China Koh day diya

Please educate yourself. The dispute between India and China in Kashmir is on an area which has never been a part of Kashmir. It was marked by a British person as part of one of several boundary marking expeditions and so was annexation of Chinese territory on paper only. According to the agreement between Pakistan and China, Pakistan refused any claim to the Chinese area and got a huge area of land released from Chinese occupation. This is a fact and you can research it.

Bro there are 53 muslim countries bro.gro a pair bro

What 53 Muslim countries? What are you talking about? My pair is with me. Do you know what a pair refers to?
 
Firstly, Kashmir never belonged to India. it was a separate state which even got special status under the puppets who signed the accession to India.

Secondly, does Delhi belong to Delhiites, or is it leased? Who made Delhiites part owners of Kashmir, but Kashmiri people became tenants of Kashmir? The fate Kashmir is decided by Kashmiri people and they will get their independence from India.
Kashmir became part of India when the accession was approved by the king. From that moment, Kashmir belonged to India and Indians, including the new Indian Kashmiri citizens. Why should a large percentage of the population loose land because of a few? We have to consider the needs of the majority. They can have Kashmir as a part of India or they can be stateless people. Their choice.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom