What's new

What you will never see again if the Hindutva faction gets their way.

What was America's problem if Afghanistan had become a socialist country and an ally of the USSR ?
Why did Soviets invaded a sovereign country? Communists declared state atheism in Afghanistan till 1987, Afghans were natural to revolt against it, they believe in Islam. Imperialistic game of Soviet and Americans destroyed the dreams of Afghans, both owe reparations to them.

And it was Soviets who acted first both times by supporting communist against Daud Khan and then invading.
 
Why did Soviets invaded a sovereign country?

It was a complex situation so I will post from a few Wikipedia pages.

From the page about Daoud Khan :
Khan met Leonid Brezhnev on a state visit to Moscow from April 12 to 15, 1977. He had asked for a private meeting with the Soviet leader to discuss with him the increased pattern of Soviet actions in Afghanistan. In particular, he discussed the intensified Soviet attempt to unite the two factions of the Afghan communist parties, Parcham and Khalq. Brezhnev described Afghanistan's non-alignment as important to the USSR and essential to the promotion of peace in Asia, but warned him about the presence of experts from NATO countries stationed in the northern parts of Afghanistan. Daoud bluntly replied that Afghanistan would remain free, and that the Soviet Union would never be allowed to dictate how the country should be governed.

After returning to Afghanistan, he made plans that his government would diminish its relationships with the Soviet Union, and instead forge closer contacts with the West as well as the oil-rich Saudi Arabia and Iran. Afghanistan signed a co-operative military treaty with Egypt and by 1977, the Afghan military and police force were being trained by Egyptian Armed forces. This angered the Soviet Union because Egypt took the same route in 1974 and distanced itself from the Soviet Union


From the page about Babrak Karmal :
Karmal remained in exile until December 1979, when the Soviet Union intervened in Afghanistan (with the consent of Amin's government) to stabilize the country.
So there was no invasion like how NATO invaded Libya in 2011 or how USA and a few allies invaded Iraq in 2003.

Communists declared state atheism in Afghanistan till 1987, Afghans were natural to revolt against it, they believe in Islam.

Even Albania, USSR and PRC were / are outwardly atheist states but I am sure people did practice their old beliefs.

The problem in Afghanistan for the state was not Islam but continuation of non-Islamic tribal practices like honor killing and burqa which continued despite the socialist state.

The revolt which you mention, probably did have some Afghans seeing the socialist state as a counter to their traditional life but the main opposition to the socialist state was from NATO and its supported militants who came from foreign countries.

Imperialistic game of Soviet and Americans destroyed the dreams of Afghans, both owe reparations to them.

Well, as ever, the Western governments owe reparations to lot of countries in the world.

In fact the Taliban were the only ones who gave the Afghans a stable govt in a century.

You must write what is your understanding of "stable".

They were "stable" because the Americans allowed them to rule, until just after the 9/11 attack.

And the Taliban shutting down barber shops, music shops, pushing women into burqa, pushing women out of schools, setting up a morality police squad etc... how can this be taken as normal ?
 
It was a complex situation so I will post from a few Wikipedia pages.
So there was no invasion like how NATO invaded Libya in 2011 or how USA and a few allies invaded Iraq in 2003.
There's no consent in invading, there's always someone ready in their country that want the country to be invaded. And your quoted Wikipedia pages tells the imperialistic nature of USSR.
Even Albania, USSR and PRC were / are outwardly atheist states but I am sure people did practice their old beliefs.
Nope, Albania killed Imams and outward Muslims on a large scale and today's Albanians even eat pork and are no Muslims, Kosovo is different because of no Enver's rule. And USSR, read about purge of Stalin when 30% of central Asia's population was massacred for enforcing communism. So much for allowing Muslims to practice their beliefs.
The revolt which you mention, probably did have some Afghans seeing the socialist state as a counter to their traditional life but the main opposition to the socialist state was from NATO and its supported militants who came from foreign countries.
I am talking about pre-Soviet invasion time. Most of the oppostion was local.
Well, as ever, the Western governments owe reparations to lot of countries in the world.
Communists too for destroying cultures, economies and lives.

Bonus : What do you think about Khmer rouge?

Daud Khan told "Afghanistan will remain an independent country" and it was enough for Soviets to interfere in a sovereign country, wow.
 
Bonus : What do you think about Khmer rouge?

From what little I know of it, it seems to have been largely been a exaggerated 'return to roots' movement which enacted enmity to urban intellectuals and urban life generally.

Found this tid-bit from the Wikipedia page for it :
During the 1980s, China and the United States - together with their allies - backed Pol Pot in exile in order to counter the power of the Soviet Union and Vietnam, providing the Khmers with intelligence, food, weapons, and military training.
So yet again, the USA government laid its dirty footprint somewhere. Same goes in the case of Afghanistan.

Daud Khan told "Afghanistan will remain an independent country" and it was enough for Soviets to interfere in a sovereign country, wow.

How does being "independent" mean allowing NATO technicians to be stationed in the country and forging close relations with the West and its allies like Saudia ?
 
How does being "independent" mean allowing NATO technicians to be stationed in the country and forging close relations with the West and its allies like Saudia ?
It's called independent foreign policy. By this logic even Pakistan should have been invaded and even India.
So yet again, the USA government laid its dirty footprint somewhere. Same goes Afghanistan.
But he was a communist.
 
It's called independent foreign policy. By this logic even Pakistan should have been invaded and even India.

Firstly, again, the Soviets did not invade but only came in to assist a brotherly country. If any set of people actually invaded Afghanistan it was the foreign terrorists with the training and other support of USA government but also a few others.

Secondly, I suppose Afghanistan was a small but front-line country in which the USSR anticipated intervention by the West and its allies and therefore sent in a big number of reinforcements.

But he was a communist.

A strange one.

He considered urban intellectuals as enemy.
 
Firstly, again, the Soviets did not invade but only came in to assist a brotherly country. If any set of people actually invaded Afghanistan it was the foreign terrorists with the training and other support of USA government but also a few others.
They did invade - there's no brotherly country there's brotherly puppet governments, it was an invasion and the communists never had popular support.
Secondly, I suppose Afghanistan was a small but front-line country in which the USSR anticipated intervention by the West and its allies and therefore sent in a big number of reinforcements.
That's interventionism, even more harmful different than from US's policies towards Cuba.

Cuba deployed Nuclear missiles from USSR such that many big US cities were under target but US didn't made a mess of it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom