What's new

Why Turkey's military base will remain in Qatar

Bubblegum Crisis

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
2,612
Reaction score
5
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
United Arab Emirates
...

Quote :


Why Turkey's military base will remain in Qatar

Yahya Bostan
Published June 24, 2017


Turkish military presence in Qatar is highly important for the stability and security of not only Qatar but the entire Gulf region

In recent weeks, Turkey's military base in Qatar became a hot-button issue as several Gulf countries, led by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, severed their ties with Doha citing the tiny nation's alleged support for terrorist groups. Just days after a series of economic, diplomatic and humanitarian sanctions were announced, the Turkish Parliament fast-tracked an agreement with Qatar regarding the establishment of a military base outside Doha. Although that bilateral agreement's ratification was considered a sign of Turkey's frustration with the Qatar crisis, this interpretation didn't necessarily reflect the truth.

Long before the most recent crisis in the region, Ankara and Doha were engaging in talks pending the Turkish Parliament's green light. As a matter of fact, more than 80 Turkish troops were already stationed in Qatar to lay the foundations of Ankara's future base. Following Parliament's approval, 23 additional troops were deployed to Doha. Simply put, the Turkish base wasn't just planned and agreed on long before the crisis but it was also an ongoing project.

The second time the Turkish military base came up during the course of the Gulf crisis was earlier this week, when several the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries provided Qatar with a list of 13 demands. You might recall that U.S. President Donald Trump had initially sided with Riyadh and others but Washington gradually backtracked on this policy. Arguably the most noteworthy challenge to the White House came from U.S. State Department Spokesperson Heather Nauert, who told reporters that the U.S. wasn't sure whether the blockade of Qatar was about terrorism after all.

Either way, the Qataris were presented with a list of demands which, according to media reports, included the downgrading of diplomatic relations with Iran, shutting down Al Jazeera and a number of other media outlets, ending Doha's support to the Muslim Brotherhood and the shutdown of Turkey's military base in Qatar along with an end to military cooperation with Ankara – which tells me that some people are unsettled by the Turkish military presence in the Gulf.

The obvious question now is whether Turkish troops in Qatar should be a source of concern and, if yes, to whom.

Before answering, it is necessary to recall why Turkey sent troops to the region in the first place and what the Turkish military has been doing there. At this time, Turkish troops serve in places like Kosovo and Afghanistan as part of international peacekeeping forces. Turkey's friends and allies repeatedly maintained over the years that Turkish troops made valuable contributions to peace and stability in host nations.

Moreover, Turkey has three military bases outside its borders. One of them is located in Bashiqa in northern Iraq, which has been a training center for anti-Daesh fighters at the request of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG). At the same time, the base makes it possible for Ankara to neutralize national security threats before Daesh terrorists reach its borders.

The second base is located in Somalia, where local troops have been receiving training as part of a broader strategy to empower that country politically, economically and socially in order to help Somalians to address the threats of instability, terrorism and hunger. In fact, Turkey provided more assistance to Somalia than any other country. Keeping in mind that the country needs a strong military to become fully stable, it is not surprising that Turkish troops have been assisting their Somalian counterparts.

The third and final military base is in Qatar. Efforts to set up the base were launched back in 2014 in an effort to contribute to Doha's security. A closer look at the date when the talks started indicates that the decision was motivated by Iranian expansionism and the situation in Syria. As the above examples clearly show, Turkey's decisions to establish military bases abroad are intended to promote the stability and security of friendly nations as well as to take pre-emptive measures threats against its own security.

Do the Gulf nations have any reason to be unsettled by the Turkish military base in Qatar? Turkey and the GCC countries see eye-to-eye on most regional issues – notwithstanding minor differences of opinion. In particular, Turkey and Saudi Arabia completely agree on the need to remove Bashar Assad's regime from power. Likewise, the Turkish government had sided with the Gulf nations during the Yemen crisis and shared Saudi concerns about Iranian expansionism. In other words, the Turkish military presence in Qatar strengthens the Saudi-led coalition's hand rather than threaten their vital interests. As such, it is important to stress that the base doesn't pose a threat to the Gulf nations.

So why did they ask Qatar to shut down the base? Why would the GCC countries, which clearly have no problem with the U.S. military base near Doha, want Turkish troops to leave? It would be wrong to assume that this demand reflects their general view on Turkey. A closer look at their demands from Qatar reveals that they actually believe that Doha threatens their vital interests. As such, they would like the Qataris to become diplomatically and economically dependent on Saudi Arabia and others, which means no relationship whatsoever with any nation that could empower Doha. In other words, the demand to shut down the Turkish base is more about weakening Qatar than the perceived threat(s) posed by Turkey.

Be that as it may, the question is whether the Saudi-led countries can reasonably request Qatar to shut down the base. The Gulf crisis cannot continue forever and, looking at the fierce competition between regional powers, it is safe to assume that the GCC countries will have to normalize their relations with Qatar sooner or later. To be clear, neither Turkey nor Qatar can be expected to give up on this strategic move due to some temporary tensions. Let's just hope that Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf nations will understand that Turkish troops will be vital for their own security in the future.


Daily Sabah



...
 
...


What 300 billion? You mean 110 billion (old deal now renewed) and 200 billion mutual business deal that has nothing to do with military purchases and where investments in KSA and the US will occur?

I can ask you the same question. Why is Turkey buying any weapons when she has the protection of NATO (USA) and hosts a US/NATO base moreover? Why did Turkey become a NATO member if not for fearing that the USSR would invade it?

You don't understand it. Both KSA and Turkey are regional powers. They are important countries.

Qatar in comparison is a small state with a native population of 320.000 people! There are 9 times as many expats as locals. Without the expats (Arab and non-Arab) Qatar would collapse tomorrow. Over 90% of the population lives in one single city (Doha).

Why is Qatar wasting billions of dollars on impossible projects just because the Al-Thani's are not satisfied with buying the most expensive art in the world, hotels in the West etc.?

Why don't they realize that they are a part of the GCC and that their policy is harmful for the GCC? What have they been hiding since 1995?

To tell you honestly, Qatar was part of empires, kingdoms, sultanates, emirates, sheikdoms, imamates native to modern-day KSA (Arabia) and ruled by people from modern-day KSA during 98% of the pre-Islamic and Islamic age. We are talking about millennia of common history.

The Al-Thani family themselves are recent migrants from Najd. 90% of all native Qataris are from KSA originally. The rest from Yemen.

Can you name me a single country in the world the size of Qatar that tries to have such delusions of grandeur? What don't they understand? They can't survive on their own and need 9 times the number of expats as locals just to survive. As I wrote and mark my words, once the gas runs out (when that happens KSA will be a fully industrialized country and economy with a huge economy and large population) they will come back begging to become a part of KSA because the people won't accept Al-Thani rule if their luxury lifestyle is gone.

Anyway also understand that there are zero problems between the average Saudi Arabian and Qatari. We don't look at each other as foreigners but rather the opposite. What some of us, not all of us, disagree with, is the current policy (in fact this dates back to 1995) policy of Qatar which despite warnings, mediation, talk etc. has not really improved from an GCC viewpoint. Tolerating such a member on the long run unchanged is not feasible.


...


UAE is a emirate consisting of 7 emirates. There are almost 10 times as many native Emiratis as Qataris. UAE is geographically many times larger as well. UAE is not pursuing a anti-GCC policy. UAE is not hosting the largest US base in the region or afraid of its brothers to such an extend that they are willing to sign deals with foreigners that have nothing to do with this region and who don't want our best. Who see us rivals. That's just the beginning of it. Qatar hosts dissidents from the GCC yet jails Qataris for writing a harmless poem. Qatar has been playing a double game for far too long and it won't be tolerated. The likes of the Mullah's running to their defense says it all. Nothing more is needed.



Not only that Al-Jazeera Arabic (the real propaganda tool of Qatar - the Al-Jazeera English that you watch is totally different) is basically the official mainstream spokesmen of all the terrorists in the region from Al-Qaeda (when OBL lived), ISIS and numerous others. You are such focused on ISIS (apparently) yet you don't know that the official propaganda toll of Qatar used to call (and still do in some instances) ISIS for a "Sunni resistance". They did that repeatedly when ISIS created havoc in 2014.

Also why is Erdogan this obsessed about defending Qatar at the expense of much larger business partners and 1000 times more important countries (KSA, UAE, Egypt etc.) if not for personal relations (business and corruption) with the Al-Thani family? Another of his many failed foreign policies?
How do you think that Turkey would react like if a Saudi Arabian or Egyptian military base in Bulgaria, Greece, Armenia, Georgia etc. was built? The Turkish military base in Qatar is tiny and it will never pose a threat for KSA/GCC should an invasion occur but we are talking about messages here and agendas.
Why does Qatar need a Turkish military base when they host the largest US base in the region and are members of the GCC? Or why has Qatar apparently signed a deal that allows Iran to have a military base? What is the Al-Thani leadership afraid of? Their brothers next door or their own people for them to need all those foreign military bases?
They have enough of protection and not only that they have a lot of military gear considering their size. Probably more than any other country in the world of their size. Those are questions that have never been answered. Similarly to the agenda of Al-Jazeera. Last time I saw Qatar is also a monarchy ruled by a family and who don't accept dissent either. Why are they hosting MB members and other dissidents who are barking against their countries of origin etc. while living in a absolute monarchy that is no different? Why this absurd hypocrisy? Are MB members and certain Islamists such dishonest people who are only looking for money and protection? Strange, very strange. Why are Turkish Islamists like you (I have seen you criticizing Turkey many times so I give you that) never criticize Qatar but KSA, UAE and other monarchies of the region? What makes Qatar differently?



...
 
Last edited:
We will stay, KSA can pound sand.
 
I disagree. Just like USA we should have as many military bases on foreign countries as possible.

That is what Atatürk would do.
Yes but Atatürk wouldnt be in the mess we are in,now.
We would have a competent Armed Forces,real ''zero problem'' policy and no trouble at home(Yurtta Sulh Cihanda Sulh).
 
something is not right here ..... arguments and counter arguments does not make sense .... there is something else that both sides do not want to talk about in public .....o_O
 
We should never have went there,MB(Muslim Brotherhood) bs of Erdogan.

I disagree. This barelly has anything to do with that. We are gaining influence and now have a proper foothold in the Gulf region. We need this for the sake of our interests. Its about time the Saudi Wahhabi/Salafi influence is getting crushed.
 
I disagree. This barelly has anything to do with that. We are gaining influence and now have a proper foothold in the Gulf region. We need this for the sake of our interests. Its about time the Saudi Wahhabi/Salafi influence is getting crushed.
What influence are you talking about,the Qatari people dont want us there,only the emir(Thani family)?
Do you think we could have opened a base there without the consent of the Saudis?
This thing between the Thani's and the other kings(KSA),emirs(UAE) is something personal,it has nothing to do with state politics.
You cant crush the Saudi influence in the GCC,they own the place.
Just wait and see,they will be bro's again,soon.
 

Back
Top Bottom