What's new

Not aware of any audit of F-16s in Pakistan, says Pentagon Read more at: http://timesofindia.india

Status
Not open for further replies.
Guys, indians are posting this kind of topics and do all possible things to keep them on the top for one reason : most people read only titles and make their mind just after having read it. Who will read a thread having thousands reply ?

Even if their lies have been exposed, they will continue. They want to repeat lies until it became truth in the mind of many many people.

That’s all.

How can we fight this kind of behaviour ?
 
Hiw did srilanka win a test series in south Africa?
It's all rhetorical.
I completely accept your position. That pak has more credible evidence . See my earlier statement to someone on prObabiliy. India has somehow not put out the evidence but I would not derive a conclusion from this.
It's just like Pak is not letting anyone go to the balakot camps. India has shown photo evidence of the roof getting damaged. Anywatmy it's all in public domain.
and with in few hour after the incident neutral satellite image expert from all around the world that you hit nothing but few trees and one dead crow @Chowkidar placemat o_O

We have also upgraded F-7 (MIG-21 cloned by China) with such small diameter intake radome (nose cone) long range radar is not possible to guide BVR to the target we have Grifo-7PG radar with range of only 55 km so tell me @Chowkidar placemat how its possible @Chowkidar placemat :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy::crazy:

Ok.. to be honest I cannot add more to this discussion. At this point it does seem that given no information rather evidence from Indian side it does appear that Pak has the upper hand.
We had abhi and wreckage your MIG-21 Bison our DG ISPR said we shot downed 2 Indian jets there is multiple you tube/facebook/twitter clips on net that there were 2 parachute falling from the downed MKI from IOK/Azad Kashmir @Chowkidar placemat :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall::crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
I Read the article again...
Pentagon was not aware of any audit. Then how did 2 senior officials talk about an audit.
Defense dept also could not confirm the foreign policy report.
So at this time it's not clear. Lara is reporting some news that came to her thru her contact . Is there a chance that her news source was wrong ? I am still saying that this is murky . He has also mentioned pak evidences. So my small proof that the journalist is not partisan.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.time...to-confirm-audit/amp_articleshow/68757450.cms
 
:hitwall: I wonder if the indians are aware of the meaning of "not aware"? Common sense dictates that "not aware" means "I don't know anything about such and such event", not that "I do know that such and such event did not happen". why do the indians lack such simple, elementary school level common sense that we actually have to explain this to them as we have to explain this to a 7 year old? :wacko: In other words, the indian reporter chidanand asks an "unnamed" corporal from the sanitization dept ( :omghaha: ) in charge of the pentagon's bathroom who was cleaning the stalls in the men's room next to the press briefing room if the corporal has heard of any pentagon officials taking a count of PAF F16s and the corporal says that he is "not aware" of any such information. IT MEANS HE DOES NOT KNOW, NOT THAT HE KNOWS IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!

I mean, I can't put it in more simpler words...the lack of beef proteins has really dumbed these indians down BIG TIME! :lol:
 
I Read the article again...
Pentagon was not aware of any audit. Then how did 2 senior officials talk about an audit.
Defense dept also could not confirm the foreign policy report.
So at this time it's not clear. Lara is reporting some news that came to her thru her contact . Is there a chance that her news source was wrong ? I am still saying that this is murky . He has also mentioned pak evidences. So my small proof that the journalist is not partisan.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.time...to-confirm-audit/amp_articleshow/68757450.cms
Ok we lost our F-16, now happy, so what next @Chowkidar placemat :angel:

:hitwall: I wonder if the indians are aware of the meaning of "not aware"? Common sense dictates that "not aware" means "I don't know anything about such and such event", not that "I do know that such and such event did not happen". why do the indians lack such simple, elementary school level common sense that we actually have to explain this to them as we have to explain this to a 7 year old? :wacko: In other words, the indian reporter chidanand asks an "unnamed" corporal from the sanitization dept ( :omghaha: ) in charge of the pentagon's bathroom who was cleaning the stalls in the men's room next to the press briefing room if the corporal has heard of any pentagon officials taking a count of PAF F16s and the corporal says that he is "not aware" of any such information. IT MEANS HE DOES NOT KNOW, NOT THAT HE KNOWS IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!

I mean, I can't put it in more simpler words...the lack of beef proteins has really dumbed these indians down BIG TIME! :lol:
good point bro @GumNaam
 
Guys, you need to stop arguing with these Indians and trying to use logic in order to get them to understand some IT tech support 'root cause analysis' bullshit. Its not a matter of too many 'ifs' or 'buts' that are left unanswered to convince these Indians, but rather what you are hearing from them is 'uff not in the butt'. There is a difference in what PAF did and what IAF wasn't able to do.
 
This is a non-story. US gov. should have contradicted the report in FT if it was a lie. They are just saying we are unaware "officially :wink: :wink:".
 
i am doing any personal attack to anyone but you (Indians) lacks logic/commonsense currently @Chowkidar placemat
This is an extremely generalised statement. Have you tried to look at other angles, played the devils advocate.

This is a non-story. US gov. should have contradicted the report in FT if it was a lie. They are just saying we are unaware "officially :wink: :wink:".
Is it the US govt job to contradict press releases always. I don't know. Maybe they comment only on what's important to them. Maybe they don't care about this issue. Let's not keep telling people what to do.
 
:hitwall: I wonder if the indians are aware of the meaning of "not aware"? Common sense dictates that "not aware" means "I don't know anything about such and such event", not that "I do know that such and such event did not happen". why do the indians lack such simple, elementary school level common sense that we actually have to explain this to them as we have to explain this to a 7 year old? :wacko: In other words, the indian reporter chidanand asks an "unnamed" corporal from the sanitization dept ( :omghaha: ) in charge of the pentagon's bathroom who was cleaning the stalls in the men's room next to the press briefing room if the corporal has heard of any pentagon officials taking a count of PAF F16s and the corporal says that he is "not aware" of any such information. IT MEANS HE DOES NOT KNOW, NOT THAT HE KNOWS IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!

I mean, I can't put it in more simpler words...the lack of beef proteins has really dumbed these indians down BIG TIME! :lol:
Ni one said what you said above.
 
Is it the US govt job to contradict press releases always. I don't know. Maybe they comment only on what's important to them. Maybe they don't care about this issue. Let's not keep telling people what to do.
Lets not be rabid Hindu extremist and think over it for a minute. If someone is attributing lies to "unnamed" US officials in a mainstream paper FT, don't you think US government will be condraticting the claims therein?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom