WILL CHINA'S AIRCRAFT CARRIER VARYAG BE AT SEA BEFORE INDIA'S INS VIKRAMADITYA?

[scuthan]

wasn't Vrayag was sold with condition that it will be not used for military purpose???? I read it some where on PDF only... It was suppose to used for study purpose (reverse engineering) or training or hotel... (may be)

Please enlighten me....

Actually we are building it into a casino.

no worries.

 

[Black Widow]

^^^ Yeah but the 'company' that bought it immediately went 'bankrupt' so it was bought over by the PLAN.

hmmm.. some thing fishy here, how that company got bankrupt agter buying it...


was is a plan of PLAN???

 

[Dragon Emperor]

China's Navy is still weak compared to even the Japanese Navy. That is even more reason why China needs 4 Carrier Battle Groups, with each CVBG having at least 4 Air Defence Destroyers attached. China also has low numbers of SSNs. Sure, China shouldn't follow USSR's footsteps, but abandoning the development of superpower military will cause China to be continued to be bullied by USA Imperialistic Agenda.

 

[cross1993]

to gambit

Everyone loves democracy, but everyone hates accused.
Everyone may have different views about "the process of democracy" and "democracy". But that is their right, "Select" and "think" right.

 

[below_freezing]

US is not a democratic country. It is a brutal police state that imprisons 1% of its population, occupies at least 7 other sovereign nations and has killed millions since 1950.

It is no better than the USSR. Well, no. The USSR believed in rights for blacks and women when the US viewed blacks as cotton pickers and women as house slaves.

 

[blackops]

@chinese members
are you guys also building a 90000+ ac

 

[Archie]

^^ yeah right, even India, with all the IQ disadvantage it has, has finally figured out the importance of carreirs, hence makes its masse strip/die of hunger in order to save some $$$ renting Ruskies' second-hand attacking subs and buying Made-by-Ruskis carrier/s...it speaks volumns.

By the look of ur word vomits , Ur IQ seems to be even lower than that of Riaz Haq and Zaid Hamid , my little yellow friend

 

[Obambam]

Actually we are building it into a casino.

no worries.

maybe we will get a floating international school too

 

[amalakas]

China's Navy is still weak compared to even the Japanese Navy. That is even more reason why China needs 4 Carrier Battle Groups, with each CVBG having at least 4 Air Defence Destroyers attached. China also has low numbers of SSNs. Sure, China shouldn't follow USSR's footsteps, but abandoning the development of superpower military will cause China to be continued to be bullied by USA Imperialistic Agenda.

but if China continues, it will eventually allow it to bully someone else with its imperialistic agenda ..right ?

 

[below_freezing]

but if China continues, it will eventually allow it to bully someone else with its imperialistic agenda ..right ?

If we were to bully someone it would be isolated, weak countries like Vietnam and Myanmar. But instead we're doing fine with both.

 

[below_freezing]

Speaking for a military that has not even 1/10th the combat experience?

Mafia bosses don't fight muscular people directly. They get their cronies and minions to surround them and scare them and insult them and push them around, but don't dare fight them.

Mafia bosses however love beating up small weak people and forcing them to pay protection fees and maybe even have some of his cronies live in their house.

 

[cross1993]

but if China continues, it will eventually allow it to bully someone else with its imperialistic agenda ..right ?

Hey, that is not funny.

Sir, the American aircraft carrier is the Yellow Sea exercises now. China's national security is threatened. We are the victims!

Only the balance of force can bring peace.

 

[duhastmish]

By the look of ur word vomits , Ur IQ seems to be even lower than that of Riaz Haq and Zaid Hamid , my little yellow friend

stop being a bi@tch mate, thats a racist term.

you are crossing the line here.

-x-x-x-x-x-x-

Chinese do have a bigger carrier but here in this particular case its about - china vs russia more than india vs china.

 

[Obambam]

but if China continues, it will eventually allow it to bully someone else with its imperialistic agenda ..right ?

Economical agenda yes but not imperialist millitary agenda. China in its thousands of years history never invaded and occupy far away lands. It is hardwork to look after itself already, why bother trying to add more weight on to its shoulders by having to look after countries in other parts of the world? That I believe is America's duty and it is in their interests to do so, but not ours (Chinese).

 

[justanobserver]

but if China continues, it will eventually allow it to bully someone else with its imperialistic agenda ..right ?

Economical agenda yes but not imperialist millitary agenda. China in its thousands of years history never invaded and occupy far away lands.

You mean the Han dynasties ?

And what about Vietnam ? (which was a Chinese colony)