What's new

India as a great power: Know your own strength

Salaam to all the Muslims,

:pakistan:

I think India is a great military power like North Korea. Both starve their own populations to impress rest of the world with their military showboating.

Hey, all the best.

Salaam to all the Muslims.

Replace India with Pakistan.
India's defence budget 1.9% of Gdp, education more than 4% of GDP. Pakistan's defence budget 4.7% of GDP, education spending 0.9% of GDP!
 
Replace India with Pakistan.
India's defence budget 1.9% of Gdp, education more than 4% of GDP. Pakistan's defence budget 4.7% of GDP, education spending 0.9% of GDP!
Ouch that hurts. :D
 
1.And what were the ideals of your Father of the Nation? Passivity, Submission, Ahimsa, etc. Offer the other cheek; don't hit back. The Hindu performs best under a foreigner. That's why you retained Mountbatten and the trend continues in Sonia Italia.

2. And you had performed best and were happiest under us, the Muslims. We did not disturb your customs or desecrate / destroy your culture. For instance, we looked the other way when you burnt your widows or offered narabali / human sacrifice.

Disagree completely. Muslims are probably the most incompetent at running Govt, and have historically made the worst rulers. You dont have to look much past the state of South Asian Muslim countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh to see how bad Muslims are when given power (argument can even be extended to other places like Afg/Arabs etc).

Islam as a religion is not fit for political sustainability. Muslims always end up slaughtering one another anyways, like we saw in 1971, current day Pak/BD. Also, Islam promotes intellectual backwardness, like treating women as 2nd class citizens by making them wer tents, which further negatively affects the political setup of whatever nation it inhabits. There is also no freedom associated with Islamic countries, you say something hich Muslims dont agree with, and KABOOM as the case is in Pak/BD today. That is another example of how Muslims/Islam promotes intellectual backwardness.
 
1.And what were the ideals of your Father of the Nation? Passivity, Submission, Ahimsa, etc. Offer the other cheek; don't hit back. The Hindu performs best under a foreigner. That's why you retained Mountbatten and the trend continues in Sonia Italia.

2. And you had performed best and were happiest under us, the Muslims. We did not disturb your customs or desecrate / destroy your culture. For instance, we looked the other way when you burnt your widows or offered narabali / human sacrifice.
1.We do not follow Gandhiji's ideology every time,otherwise Bangladesh would have never come into existence.And Sonia Gandhi rules a party,not India.
2.Under you?:lol:Are you claiming to be direct descendant of Babur?If so,read his autobiography and his view about Hindustan which you were also a part of.
 
Disagree completely. Muslims are probably the most incompetent at running Govt, and have historically made the worst rulers. You dont have to look much past the state of South Asian Muslim countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh to see how bad Muslims are when given power (argument can even be extended to other places like Afg/Arabs etc).

Islam as a religion is not fit for political sustainability. Muslims always end up slaughtering one another anyways, like we saw in 1971, current day Pak/BD. Also, Islam promotes intellectual backwardness, like treating women as 2nd class citizens by making them wer tents, which further negatively affects the political setup of whatever nation it inhabits. There is also no freedom associated with Islamic countries, you say something hich Muslims dont agree with, and KABOOM as the case is in Pak/BD today. That is another example of how Muslims/Islam promotes intellectual backwardness.

Lol, it was Muslims that made Hindustan the world gem. Not some Hindus. You Hindus were busy fighting each other.
Pakistan & Bangladesh are still better than India.
Yeah, all Indians love to migrate to Arab countries, leaving India. Every year 1 million live India. Why? I thought India was a superpower?

Lol, during times when Europe was a dark forest, the Middle East was the star of the world. Baghdad the gem.
Dont even make me talk about Hindus fighting each other... lol.

No offence, but Hinduism was the one that was promoting social backwardness. From caste system, to Sati, you name it.

I guess you guys finally became civlized when Mohammed Babur took over India. A few periods of civilized Hindus during Mughal rule... Then back to uncivilized once Mughal empire ended... Then back to civlized once British empire controlled India. Then back to uncivilized after 1947. Can you Indians be civlized again? Lets find out. Might take some time. Just dont throw your wives into fire or anything like that..
 
Pakistan follows a western culture totally foreign to their land - Islam.

Meaningless response to by genuine post.

"Islam" isn't a "culture" ... There is much more to Pakistani culture than just Islam.
Only a fool would say Japan, Russia are not westernised,

Exactly, and that fool is you. I never said that Japan, Russia etc aren't Westernized or that they don't have Western influence...Read my post again.

Even "West" is 'Middle-Easternized/Islamicized' in sooooooooooooooooooooo many ways...

I clearly wrote that great civilizations do influence eachother throughout history...

My point was something else in a different context...leave it.
 
Salaam to all the Muslims,

:pakistan:

I think India is a great military power like North Korea. Both starve their own populations to impress rest of the world with their military showboating.

Hey, all the best.

Salaam to all the Muslims.

Wow utter ignorance for all facts......... Less than 2% goes into defense...... unlike in your country.
 
Hindustan had reached the pinnacle of its magnificence under the Mughals. Only when the Muslims are back to rule Hindustan can she hope for greatness. The Hindus are a timid people more used to commercial activities and menial functions of the society rather than ruling. They do not have the character or mental make up even to desire real greatness.

We all have seen how Bangladeshis and Pakistanis run their countries since 1947. :what:
 
:omghaha:

You reminded me of Indra and other Gods drinking Madira and watching Dances of Apsaras.

Ancient Dance Bar. :lol:

i remember reading gautam budh in 8th standard.
amrapali was shown naked in black and white drawing.
gautam budh was telling his disciples not to fall for the beauty of amrapali :D
also wife of gautam budh was shown naked in our text books :D

and this sh8t is direct from mahabharata
kunti prayed to the god of sun and he appeared to her.
then she asked him for a kid and she was granted a baby boy.
why don't they write she asked him to make love to her.this is some distortion of epic.
and if really she was granted child like all the god stuff that is shown in hindu mythology why did she abandoned that kid in river???

lol man these present day brahmins and pundits are full of sh8t.they tell lies and people believe them.

1.And what were the ideals of your Father of the Nation? Passivity, Submission, Ahimsa, etc. Offer the other cheek; don't hit back. The Hindu performs best under a foreigner. That's why you retained Mountbatten and the trend continues in Sonia Italia.

2. And you had performed best and were happiest under us, the Muslims. We did not disturb your customs or desecrate / destroy your culture. For instance, we looked the other way when you burnt your widows or offered narabali / human sacrifice.

lol we've got another descendant of great mughals on def.pk.
where did you learn this kind of sh8t???
hindus evil,muslim,my land,our,my precious,israelis bad,zionist.really????
world is full of sh8t.there are more poor people in the indian sub continent then the whole world and you still wanna fight about iam hindu and you are muslim.
c'mon man bongs are better then that.
 
Being aggressive is not the same as being great - Being provocative, taking offense, none of these are about being great and powerful

There was a reason I had asked, in the "Usual but Necessary" to not count on Pakistan members - to Pakistani members, it is inconceivable that great would not mean aggressive, or not using military power - that society is caught up in a fantasy,a story of a culture that is not even their own, where even taking a dumb is a religious issue, where God is about fashion sense, they are a million miles away from reality - India must decide for herself, what great is to mean. We have pointed to what we think is most persuasive in the trilateral discussions, in a consciousness, that the life of consciousness must be one of dignity and ethics -- allow the borrowed Utopia Pakistani society escapes in, to wither without the sustenance of conflict, anger and the "other"

Ok, fair enough..

I'm not opposed to change...Change is MUST in every culture.. as I said

" Self-Respect is when you keep your own culture and evolve your culture under the influences of globalization..but maintain your indigenous cultural outlook (E.g, Japan, China, Islamic World, Western World, Russia etc).."

Anyways, on topic, the article is retarded.

I don't know why indians are obsessed with hegemonic mind-set..

indian military strength is as useless as say South Africa's....indians can not deploy their military strength against Pakistan and China...and they'll face no aggression from Pakistan or China...It is a stalemate...so why brag about how big bad your military is becoming?

Did you not see how there are many members - infact most members - who disagree with the article that India needs to use either force or bully its way to become a great power - align with West against China to be a great power.

You are far too blinded by what people write on internet forums to have an accurate idea of what the Indians actually think.
A hint to the wise:There is a reason why military in this country is not given that a high value in the official order.

And as much as Western culture influences us, India influences Western cultures just as much. We are the sole exception in the category of developing countries that has as much soft power as it does. It is always a two way street.
 
Compared to Indians... :omghaha:

India: 10th largest economy by GDP, 3rd largest by PPP, G20 member, BRICS member, one of the largest middle classes, still growing with over 5 % despite global recession, has a stable democracy, never experienced military rule, many new global players are rising out of India, one of the top destinations for FDI etc etc etc...

Pakistan: Cannot get its country under control, threat of military dictatorship, undemocratic, among the top in the failed state index, huge influence of radical groups etc etc = probably the worst conditions for economic success.
 
This will explain.

India_missile.jpg



No state can achieve greatness by feeding off its citizens to achieve military greatness instead of feeding its citizens. India may become the 4th largest spender on bombs and guns in next 6 years and claim greatness, however the same country ranks 135th on international human development index and is home to one of the largest malnourished population on earth.

It applies to Pakistan as well, as we spend more than we can afford to but Pakistan isn't willing to claim greatness nor do we have any hegemonic desires. This is why i said that India should invest in its citizens instead of buying arms, or keep a balance to achieve real greatness. For example Indian defense budget is around 36 billion a year while the Education budget is around 9-10billion.I am no friend of India, i would rather have India carry on with ignoring development of its own citizens which will do to India what no enemy can.


About the less than 2$ theory,for an Indian, earning 2$ per day,which is roughly equal to INR 100/- and PKR 100/- is sufficient to lead a decent life.
 

Back
Top Bottom