What's new

Busted again- " China gets $1 trillion boost from dodgy data: Report"

Madclown said it in a video that is popular with the F-22 critics. Keyword search 'rachel maddow f-22' . Only the gullible would believe it.


I think she got her points from this article : Premier U.S. Fighter Jet Has Major Shortcomings - Washington Post

stealth being a huge part of the aircraft and most maintenance associated with F22 has to do with the " stealth" feature, which the air force also acknowledged.

she is not mad clown or cow, come on now.

she is quoting a comment made by someone about the " vulnerability to rain" and not asserting it. I really like some more clarity about it. I think she is just going by comment made by a some guy in the know. although I find it kind of irresponsible all the same coming from her. Rest of her video is pretty spot on but that does not make the aircraft any less lethal, would you agree? even Gates and Mccain said so re: boondoggle ...I think moving to F35 is the right decision. F22 was inducted when- in the 80's was it?
 
Unless the us government or some reputable government makes an official statement it is all crap.

You would think 1 trillion is big enough deal for some people to say something.

Btw does anyone think american data has no element of fraud? It is the birth place of the ponzi scheme and home of the over spenders.
 
Unless the us government or some reputable government makes an official statement it is all crap.

.

see highlighted- so you asking the criminal to present proof he is guilty? :lol:

let me try and explain your system to you.

when you have a system that only promotes people within the one party based on results with no check and balances, they you have an high incentive to fudge the numbers i.e. The guys on the provincial level are fudging the numbers to be promoted - because they know there is no check and balances or free press to check them on it.
 
see highlighted- so you asking the criminal to present proof he is guilty? :lol:

United states, besides after that it did say reputable government.

If it just us as in we government it won't even make sense.
 
United states, besides after that it did say reputable government.

If it just us as in we government it won't even make sense.

come again. I can't figure out what you are trying to say honestly.
 
Give it a break guys. China - be it manipulating or not, still holds the world in its reins where even the US has to , at times, sit down with them to talk shop. Ultimately at the end of the day, it's not what you really have in the bank. It's what you project and the Chinese govt has done it well so far. Take their foreign policy, take their acumen in fastening deals in the third world and the rapid rise in diaspora in Africa. You GOT to give credit where it is due.
 
come again. I can't figure out what you are trying to say honestly.

Are you saying you don't trust united states or making a comment on us government by understanding it as we rather than united states?

Also the ccp is a party open to all, not to a ethinicity or family or anything like that. Is your congress party top leadership like that too? Or just the one family.
 
Are you saying you don't trust united states or making a comment on us government by understanding it as we rather than united states?

Also the ccp is a party open to all, not to a ethinicity or family or anything like that. Is your congress party top leadership like that too? Or just the one family.

Oh dude , I made out parts of what you are trying to say, sorry. In the US we have two parties( republican and democrat) that are strong and some small parties ( green party, andr I'm sure there some other out there). anyone can join any party regardless of background. Now the republicans tend to be old white christian.

Then we have a free press- there to check the govt. for example , our press actually brought down a president. it is by no means perfect, but if you don't have a free press ( like you guys who just jailed another journalist)- then you have the propensity to have fudged numbers and high corruption that goes undetected and unreported.
 
Oh dude , I made out parts of what you are trying to say, sorry. In the US we have two parties( republican and democrat) that are strong and some small parties ( green party, andr I'm sure there some other out there). anyone can join any party regardless of background. Now the republicans tend to be old white christian.

Then we have a free press- there to check the govt. for example , our press actually brought down a president. it is by no means perfect, but if you don't have a free press ( like you guys who just jailed another journalist)- then you have the propensity to have fudged numbers and high corruption that goes undetected and unreported.

Yea i lived in the states, since you apparently can't scroll two cm to the top i'll repeat it.

Until the UNITED STATES government comes out with an official statement about our gdp, or another reputable government, than it is all crap.

1 trillion is a huge number, you would think people would not let it go, and not let internet nobodies have all the fun.

This is like sudan suddenly said they were growing at 20%, and soon had a trillion dollars economy, you think the world governments would say something.

Instead of 99% of all journalists agreeing on chinses numbers and all governments.
 
Yea i lived in the states, since you apparently can't scroll two cm to the top i'll repeat it.

Until the UNITED STATES government comes out with an official statement about our gdp, or another reputable government, than it is all crap.

Unites states govt does not comment on any countries GDP as a judge and jury. Hope you enjoyed you stay here!
 
I did not write the article or several articles ...

So several articles is suppose to mean something? I can also find articles that say the states is going down the crapper from "trustworthy" sources. Also obama is african, muslim and terriorits, the devil, the antichrist and a janiter.

Which should i believe?
 
So several articles is suppose to mean something? I can also find articles that say the states is going down the crapper from "trustworthy" sources. Also obama is african, muslim and terriorits, the devil, the antichrist and a janiter.

Which should i believe?

reputable economist and financial institutions within those articles , your stock market that has posted year long losses while being a great GDP. your govt who has said one part of data is at least fudged and clamped down export figures. you don't have to believe jack...you can carry on.
 
reputable economist and financial institutions within those articles , your stock market that has posted year long losses while being a great GDP. your govt who has said one part of data is at least fudged and clamped down export figures. you don't have to believe jack...you can carry on.

Do you consider nyt, yahoo, bloomberg, and such reputable? If yes than i can find articles that says china will soon surpass america.

Also i do carry on, but some people try to use these false info to discredit china in order to make themselves feel better, not saying who, just some people.
 

Back
Top Bottom