What's new

Indian economy registers a weaker growth at 4.4%

It has always been a movie, so don't act stupid by trying to parse my words. You are expert at parsing words and meanings while are always short on facts and knowledge.

the maker of the movie could be a nut job. And he would be related to you. The movie is a 2010 movie called super. Check it out yourself.


The movie is a utopian film which has a concept of a contrasting futuristic India set in the year 2030, and the contemporary image of India

Do you think such fictional movies are a reflection of reality? :rofl:
 
So what he became Buddha in India? If you're born in India, but you earned your master degree in the US, does it make you an American?

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/centra...ters-weaker-growth-4-4-a-2.html#ixzz2dcfQxp1f

Buddha was firstly a Hindu like the majority in Nepal,second he gained enlightenment in the current Indian subcontinent, 3rdly Nepal has open borders with India considering the shared traditional and cultural history, and last of all India is a piece of territory(that is majority Hindu) but heritage goes past borders and gets liked with civilizational roots.

By the braindead logic Oriental idots love to often use , anyone living in a different country has no right of owning up there ancestral heritage? then all Expats of xyz countries are barred from such associations?.Are all u idiots averse to talking sense ?

and lastly why are we even discussing this when this is clearly off topic....pfft.
 
The movie is a utopian film which has a concept of a contrasting futuristic India set in the year 2030, and the contemporary image of India

Do you think such fictional movies are a reflection of reality? :rofl:

A utopian film? I guess its a utopian for Indians as India has white servants. But this would be a nightmarish film for white people. I guess rampant racism against other people is utopia for Indians like you.
 
So what he became Buddha in India? If you're born in India, but you earned your master degree in the US, does it make you an American?

Indians in America will call themselves Americans when its convenient and beneficial to them. Our resident troll is a self proclaimed American with Indian heritage.
 
A utopian film? I guess its a utopian for Indians as India has white servants. But this would be a nightmarish film for white people. I guess rampant racism against other people is utopia for Indians like you.

But do u understand the difference between a movie and real life? or u that deluded? lol
 
dynasty is a rule like a kingdom not a country so by that logic so did the Gupta dynasty

Its Gupta empire. Gupta never succeeded another dynasty and no other dynasty succeeded Gupta. In another word, Gupta never claimed that its leader is a successor of a previous empire. It claims to be a conqueror of a previous empire, but never a successor.

For example, Indian union is a successor of British India.

But do u understand the difference between a movie and real life? or u that deluded? lol

I'm not talking about whether its fictional or not. I'm talking about how you refer to the scene in the movie as "utopia". It does not look like utopia to white people there. Its a nightmare for them.
 
Its Gupta empire. Gupta never succeeded another dynasty and no other dynasty succeeded Gupta. In another word, Gupta never claimed that its leader is a successor of a previous empire. It claims to be a conqueror of a previous empire, but never a successor.

For example, Indian union is a successor of British India.


http://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/exhibit/guptas/guptas.html


I can refer to it by dynasty or empire or is China only allowed that privilege?
 
India will come back strong wait for six months. Among BRIC india is still better than brazil

Blind hope bro, lets wait ands see.

Until then no need for being overly optimistic ull set urself up for disappointment, a neutral indifference is good enough.

Having said this , Coming back on track is not even hard from where and what im looking, i can safely estimate it take less than a year to to get back to 6.5% growth and less than 3% fiscal deficit if the policy measure i know to have been introduced, pass on unabated ;and the populist Food subsidy BS is not one of them.
 
Buddha was firstly a Hindu like the majority in Nepal,second he gained enlightenment in the current Indian subcontinent, 3rdly Nepal has open borders with India considering the shared traditional and cultural history, and last of all India is a piece of territory(that is majority Hindu) but heritage goes past borders and gets liked with civilizational roots.

By the braindead logic Oriental idots love to often use , anyone living in a different country has no right of owning up there ancestral heritage? then all Expats of xyz countries are barred from such associations?.

and lastly why are we even discussing this when this is clearly off topic....pfft.

India was part of the British empire for 200 years, even today, British heritage lives on. Gandhi earned his degree in the UK, do you see British claiming him as one of their own?
Why is it that whenever comes to India, the logic of reasoning does not apply?
 
Gupta dynasty (Indian dynasty) -- Encyclopedia Britannica

Gupta dynasty, rulers of the Magadha (now Bihar) state in northeastern India. They maintained an empire over northern and parts of central and western India from the early 4th to the late 6th century ce. The founder was Chandra Gupta I, who was succeeded by his son, the celebrated Samudra Gupta. The Gupta era produced the decimal system of notation and great Sanskrit epics and Hindu art and contributed to the sciences of astronomy, mathematics, and metallurgy.
 
cheenia can't fathom that Lord Buddha was a prince in an Indian kingdom. Nepal is nothing more than an Indian kingdom that survived into the modern era giving it the right to claim nation-state status like Sikkim or Bhutan.
 

Back
Top Bottom