What's new

India-Pakistan series unlikely to go ahead

khakhi_chaddi

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
306
Reaction score
-12
Country
India
Location
India
A top BCCI official says board is unlikely to get required clearance from external affairs ministry for resumption of cricketing ties with Pakistan

Venkat Ananth

BCCI.jpg

Photo: Reuters


New Delhi: The proposed bilateral cricket series between India and Pakistan is unlikely to go ahead, a top official of the Board for Control of Cricket in India (BCCI) said on Friday.

However, a day before, BCCI official and chairman of the Indian Premier League (IPL) Rajeev Shukla said bilateral cricketing ties between India and Pakistan would resume with a five-match series, scheduled to take place in the neutral venue of Sri Lanka. Shukla said the series would tentatively start on 15 December.

The official said that the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the BCCI and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) was signed by its former president N Srinivasan “as part of a deal that would bring Pakistan on board for the ‘Big Three’ proposal”.

According to the MoU, signed in May last year, the two countries are expected to play six bilateral series in the next eight years, including 12 Tests, 30 ODIs and 11 Twenty20s. The MoU was then converted into a so-called binding agreement in June last year, following Pakistan’s belated and grudging support for the ICC’s restructuring reforms.

In return, PCB did not oppose Srinivasan’s election as the ICC’s first ever chairman. The agreement was reported to be a reward for the significant concessions by the PCB. In August last year, the ICC, on its part, confirmed that India and Pakistan would play a bilateral series in December 2015.

Since the signing of the MoU, there has been a regime change both in the government of India and within the BCCI. Last month, Shashank Manohar was elected the BCCI president for his second term, following the demise of late Jagmohan Dalmiya. Dalmiya, during his brief return as BCCI president, was in favour of the series, subject to government clearance.

Neutral venue

Last week, following discussions between BCCI chief Shashank Manohar and his PCB counterpart Shaharyar Khan, Sri Lanka had emerged as a possible ‘neutral’ venue for the proposed bilateral series. The MoU does provide for the series to be played in a ‘neutral’ venue.

For any such move, the BCCI needs political clearance. Since the series was to be played in Sri Lanka, a third country, “the first assessment and clearance” has to be given by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). If indeed, the MEA cleared the proposal, the Press Trust of India reported, “the Home Ministry may send an advance security liaison team to the country where it may be held,” in this case Sri Lanka.

The cricket board was unlikely to receive the required clearance from the foreign ministry for resumption of cricketing ties with Pakistan, the official said, requesting anonymity.
 
^^^^^^^^^^
A quick question...if BCCI needs clearance from Govt. then how did they sign something with PCB?? PCB is right when they complain about BCCI not fulfilling a binding agreement...Am i missing something here??
 
^^^^^^^^^^
A quick question...if BCCI needs clearance from Govt. then how did they sign something with PCB?? PCB is right when they complain about BCCI not fulfilling a binding agreement...Am i missing something here??
Corrupt person called Srinivasan.
 
There is no point in playing with India, last time we went to their home and beat them 2-1. Why to waste our time again ? :lol:
 
BCCI be like

Hum UAE ni jaien gai mansoobabandi kr k harate ho

Hum SriLanka ni jaien gai wo Humein pasnd ni

India me aa k khelo bahir jane se hamari phat jati hai... Hum ghar k Sher hain....
 
Correct me of i m wrong there was only MOU signed not any agreement between BCCI an PCB, it is not binding on BCCI.
 
Irrespective of his corruption...he was the chief and BCCI is in a binding agreement...either play or pay up the fines....

Only BCCI can do it to WICB!!!:lol:

But on a serious note, while I agree that they should pay compensation on ground of equity, I also don't see the point of playing them. Hafeez Sayeed is still at large and so is Dawood.
 
But on a serious note, while I agree that they should pay compensation on ground of equity, I also don't see the point of playing them. Hafeez Sayeed is still at large and so is Dawood.
Exactly, We should try to bankrupt them by any means possible
 
Exactly, We should try to bankrupt them by any means possible

Taking the moral high-ground with people who have absolutely no concept of morality is a fool's errand. Only our government should talk with theirs if it sees it fit to do so. As for the rest, the only other contact the two countries should have is on PDF!!!:lol::D

Correct me of i m wrong there was only MOU signed not any agreement between BCCI an PCB, it is not binding on BCCI.

That would depend on whether TV rights etc. have already been sold, sponsorship decisions, and so on. MOU in cricket may not mean the same as in the business world. Anyone who knows what happened in the West Indies case where BCCI claimed compensation for the cancelled series will be better able to inform us.
 
Only BCCI can do it to WICB!!!:lol:

But on a serious note, while I agree that they should pay compensation on ground of equity, I also don't see the point of playing them. Hafeez Sayeed is still at large and so is Dawood.
Well my deal breaker would be Lakhvi...having said that either we should stop all kind of sporting ties or go full bang...why only keep cricket at bay??
 
Cricket be free from larger country's interests. There is no correlation between the two. Holding Cricket hostage to country's interest is childish.
 

Back
Top Bottom