What's new

Should Pakistan just repatriate Kashmiri Muslims?

Should Pakistan just repatriate Kashmiri Muslims?

  • Yes

    Votes: 18 48.6%
  • No

    Votes: 19 51.4%

  • Total voters
    37
No Kashmiri people would not want to leave their birthplace, their land .. This won't be acceptable to them.. It is their land.. why should they abandon them??


They want their land independent and are ready to fight for it for as long as it goes.. Abandoning their land would be like losing the Freedom Struggle in real terms for the Kashmiri people .


More like you want them to fight & die to the last Kashmiri if necessary & will only welcome them if they come with some land......:lol:
 
I really appreciate this gesture / idea. It should have been mulled earlier. After all, Pakistan was created for all Muslims of the sub-continent - till as late as the mid 1960s people were free to cross the border - the cricketer Asif Iqbal comes to mind. If Pakistan does it, it will win diplomatic brownie points and put India on the backfoot. I don't know how many people would migrate - of course the Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and Shias would probably not.
 
Btw I am an ethnic Kashmiri. And I would love Kashmir to join Pakistan. But even more than that I want my ethnicity to be rid of the Hindu country's identity forced upon them.
 
Yes. It 'should'. Lots of things 'should' happen.

But it won't happen.

This is why their is war and hostility in south asia

India is the cause of this


Kashmiris will continue to fight for their freedom and Pakistan will continue to support them and look to block, harm india
 
I really appreciate this gesture / idea. It should have been mulled earlier. After all, Pakistan was created for all Muslims of the sub-continent - till as late as the mid 1960s people were free to cross the border - the cricketer Asif Iqbal comes to mind. If Pakistan does it, it will win diplomatic brownie points and put India on the backfoot. I don't know how many people would migrate - of course the Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists and Shias would probably not.

True. Indian Muslims (especially from UP and Rajasthan) used to migrate to Pakistan in their tens of thousands yearly during the 1950s and 1960s.
 
Pakistan was founded on the basis of the two nation theory. How can Hindus belong in Pakistan? Quaid e Azam wanted to keep them so we could ensure the rights of the Muslims left behind in India.
What nonsense. Jinnah himself wanted to retire in Bombay and told Nehru not to sell his bungalow. He wanted to create Pakistan to create a homeland for Indian Muslims - but not exclusively for Indian Muslims - neither side envisioned the madness that followed.
 
What nonsense. Jinnah himself wanted to retire in Bombay and told Nehru not to sell his bungalow. He wanted to create Pakistan to create a homeland for Indian Muslims - but not exclusively for Indian Muslims - neither side envisioned the madness that followed.
Not true. Jinnah was never serious about it. Or he thought that the Indians will be gullible enough to repeat their mistakes over and over again.
 
Kashmiri people have been bled dry by Indians again and again so i dont think it is as simple as repetriation anymore because Indians have taken it to another level of barbarism and brutality. Denying UN access is just another show of their guilt in Kashmir.
 
Not true. Jinnah was never serious about it. Or he thought that the Indians will be gullible enough to repeat their mistakes over and over again.
Let's agree to disagree. My understanding of history is that he merely wanted to create a political space for himself and thus accepted the Cabinet Mission Plan for a United India. And he assumed the British would give him Muslim majority provinces as Pakistan - not the part of the province with the majority - so he expected full Bengal and full Punjab. Heck, he even gave a blank cheque to Hindu majority kingdoms like Bikaner and Jaisalmer to accede to Pakistan.
 

Back
Top Bottom