What's new

25 countries halve multidimensional poverty: UNDP

SoulSpokesman

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
3,631
Reaction score
-15
Country
India
Location
India
@Indos @RiazHaq @Bilal9 @Joe Shearer


New York City – The latest update of the global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) with estimates for 110 countries was released today by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) at the University of Oxford. The report demonstrates that poverty reduction is achievable. However, the lack of comprehensive data over the COVID-19 pandemic poses challenges in assessing immediate prospects.

The analysis of trends from 2000 to 2022, focused on 81 countries with comparable data over time, reveals that 25 countries successfully halved their global MPI values within 15 years, showing that rapid progress is attainable. These include Cambodia, China, Congo, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Morocco, Serbia, and Viet Nam.

Notably, India saw a remarkable reduction in poverty, with 415 million people exiting poverty within a span of just 15 years (2005/6–19/21). Large numbers of people were lifted out of poverty in China (2010–14, 69 million) and Indonesia (2012–17, 8 million).

Countries halved their MPI in periods as short as four to 12 years, demonstrating the feasibility of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target of halving poverty according to national definitions within 15 years. Thus, it is crucial to consider context-specific multidimensional poverty indices that reflect national definitions of poverty, since the global MPI assesses multidimensional poverty with the same methodology.

Despite these encouraging trends, the lack of post-pandemic data for most of the 110 countries covered by the global MPI restricts our understanding of the pandemic's effects on poverty.

Pedro Conceição, Director of the Human Development Report Office, observed: "As we reach the mid-point of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, we can clearly see that there was steady progress in multidimensional poverty reduction before the pandemic. However, the negative impacts of the pandemic in dimensions such as education are significant and can have long-lasting consequences. It is imperative that we intensify efforts to comprehend the dimensions most negatively affected, necessitating strengthened data collection and policy efforts to get poverty reduction back on track."

Judging from the few countries where data were solely collected in 2021 or 2022 – Mexico, Madagascar, Cambodia, Peru, and Nigeria – momentum on poverty reduction may have persisted during the pandemic. Cambodia, Peru, and Nigeria showed significant reductions in their most recent periods, offering hope that progress is still possible. In Cambodia, the most encouraging case among these, the incidence of poverty fell from 36.7% to 16.6%, and the number of poor people halved, from 5.6 million to 2.8 million, all within 7.5 years, including pandemic years (2014–2021/22).

However, the full impacts globally remain to be measured. With a renewed emphasis on data collection, we need to broaden the picture to include the impacts of the pandemic on children. In over half the countries covered, there was either no statistically significant reduction in child poverty or the MPI value fell more slowly among children than among adults during at least one period. This suggests that child poverty will continue to be a pressing issue, particularly in relation to school attendance and undernutrition.

"The astonishing scarcity of data on multidimensional poverty is hard to comprehend, let alone justify. The world is reeling under a data deluge and gearing up for the next era of digital growth. Yet we do not have a post-pandemic line of sight for 1 billion of the 1.1 billion poor people”, said Sabina Alkire, Director of OPHI at the University of Oxford. “This problem is eminently solvable – data on multidimensional poverty are faster to gather than most realize – requiring just 5% of questions in the surveys we use. We call on funders and data scientists to make a breakthrough on poverty data, so the interconnected deprivations that strike poor people in real time can be tracked – and intercepted."

The global MPI both monitors poverty reduction and informs policy, showing how people experience poverty in different aspects of their daily lives – from access to education and health, to living standards such as housing, drinking water, sanitation, and electricity. The MPI as a poverty index can be pictured as a stacked tower of the interlinked deprivations experienced by poor individuals, with the aim of eliminating these deprivations.

According to the 2023 release, 1.1 billion out of 6.1 billion people (just over 18%) live in acute multidimensional poverty across 110 countries. Sub-Saharan Africa (534 million) and South Asia (389 million) are home to approximately five out of every six poor people.

Nearly two-thirds of all poor people (730 million people) live in middle-income countries, making action in these countries vital for reducing global poverty. Although low-income countries constitute only 10% of the population included in the MPI, these are where 35% of all poor people reside.

Children under 18 years old account for half of MPI-poor people (566 million). The poverty rate among children is 27.7%, while among adults it is 13.4%. Poverty predominantly affects rural areas, with 84% of all poor people living in rural areas. Rural areas are poorer than urban areas across all regions of the world.

The MPI sheds light on the complexity of poverty – where different indicators contribute to people's experience of poverty differently, varying from region to subnational region, and between and within communities. Ensuring that the data on global poverty is up-to-date and comprehensive is a crucial first step in addressing these challenges and maintaining progress towards a more equal world.
 
In the absence of real data, India's stats are all being manufactured by BJP to win elections.

Postponing India’s census is terrible for the country
But it may suit Narendra Modi just fine

https://www.economist.com/asia/2023/01/05/postponing-indias-census-is-terrible-for-the-country


Narendra Modi often overstates his achievements. For example, the Hindu-nationalist prime minister’s claim that all Indian villages have been electrified on his watch glosses over the definition: only public buildings and 10% of households need a connection for the village to count as such. And three years after Mr Modi declared India “open-defecation free”, millions of villagers are still purging al fresco. An absence of up-to-date census information makes it harder to check such inflated claims. It is also a disaster for the vast array of policymaking reliant on solid population and development data.

----------

Three years ago India’s government was scheduled to pose its citizens a long list of basic but important questions. How many people live in your house? What is it made of? Do you have a toilet? A car? An internet connection? The answers would refresh data from the country’s previous census in 2011, which, given India’s rapid development, were wildly out of date. Because of India’s covid-19 lockdown, however, the questions were never asked.

Almost three years later, and though India has officially left the pandemic behind, there has been no attempt to reschedule the decennial census. It may not happen until after parliamentary elections in 2024, or at all. Opposition politicians and development experts smell a rat.

----------

For a while policymakers can tide themselves over with estimates, but eventually these need to be corrected with accurate numbers. “Right now we’re relying on data from the 2011 census, but we know our results will be off by a lot because things have changed so much since then,” says Pronab Sen, a former chairman of the National Statistical Commission who works on the household-consumption survey. And bad data lead to bad policy. A study in 2020 estimated that some 100m people may have missed out on food aid to which they were entitled because the distribution system uses decade-old numbers.

Similarly, it is important to know how many children live in an area before building schools and hiring teachers. The educational misfiring caused by the absence of such knowledge is particularly acute in fast-growing cities such as Delhi or Bangalore, says Narayanan Unni, who is advising the government on the census. “We basically don’t know how many people live in these places now, so proper planning for public services is really hard.”

The home ministry, which is in charge of the census, continues to blame its postponement on the pandemic, most recently in response to a parliamentary question on December 13th. It said the delay would continue “until further orders”, giving no time-frame for a resumption of data-gathering. Many statisticians and social scientists are mystified by this explanation: it is over a year since India resumed holding elections and other big political events.
 
But why in globle hunger index India still ranks at the bottom?
If you go by ratio or percentage than Pakistan and other many countries are having worst than India.

But since population of India is almost more than 7 times and more, the name of India get highlighted.
 
Last edited:
In the absence of real data, India's stats are all being manufactured by BJP to win elections.

Postponing India’s census is terrible for the country
But it may suit Narendra Modi just fine

https://www.economist.com/asia/2023/01/05/postponing-indias-census-is-terrible-for-the-country


Narendra Modi often overstates his achievements. For example, the Hindu-nationalist prime minister’s claim that all Indian villages have been electrified on his watch glosses over the definition: only public buildings and 10% of households need a connection for the village to count as such. And three years after Mr Modi declared India “open-defecation free”, millions of villagers are still purging al fresco. An absence of up-to-date census information makes it harder to check such inflated claims. It is also a disaster for the vast array of policymaking reliant on solid population and development data.

----------

Three years ago India’s government was scheduled to pose its citizens a long list of basic but important questions. How many people live in your house? What is it made of? Do you have a toilet? A car? An internet connection? The answers would refresh data from the country’s previous census in 2011, which, given India’s rapid development, were wildly out of date. Because of India’s covid-19 lockdown, however, the questions were never asked.

Almost three years later, and though India has officially left the pandemic behind, there has been no attempt to reschedule the decennial census. It may not happen until after parliamentary elections in 2024, or at all. Opposition politicians and development experts smell a rat.

----------

For a while policymakers can tide themselves over with estimates, but eventually these need to be corrected with accurate numbers. “Right now we’re relying on data from the 2011 census, but we know our results will be off by a lot because things have changed so much since then,” says Pronab Sen, a former chairman of the National Statistical Commission who works on the household-consumption survey. And bad data lead to bad policy. A study in 2020 estimated that some 100m people may have missed out on food aid to which they were entitled because the distribution system uses decade-old numbers.

Similarly, it is important to know how many children live in an area before building schools and hiring teachers. The educational misfiring caused by the absence of such knowledge is particularly acute in fast-growing cities such as Delhi or Bangalore, says Narayanan Unni, who is advising the government on the census. “We basically don’t know how many people live in these places now, so proper planning for public services is really hard.”

The home ministry, which is in charge of the census, continues to blame its postponement on the pandemic, most recently in response to a parliamentary question on December 13th. It said the delay would continue “until further orders”, giving no time-frame for a resumption of data-gathering. Many statisticians and social scientists are mystified by this explanation: it is over a year since India resumed holding elections and other big political events.
Poor guy, crying his pretty heart out. I don’t think @RiazHaq likes Modi
 
微信图片_20230713023326.png

捕捉.jpg
 
Last edited:
Poor guy, crying his pretty heart out. I don’t think @RiazHaq likes Modi

If you got facts and figures then argue with those.

Otherwise khamoshi is a better option.

BTW - Bangladesh did better at reducing MPI than India did until 2019. Not sure after covid, no data.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bangladesh reduces multidimensional poverty​

Ibrahim Hossain Ovi
  • Published at 09:59 pm July 18th, 2020
aid to poor-food -poverty-mehedi hasan dt

A woman is standing with her child in her one hand and aid in her another hand Mehedi Hasan/Dhaka Tribune

19m people have been lifted out of poverty between 2014 and 2019

Bangladesh has significantly reduced multidimensional poverty and made substantial progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, as 19 million people were lifted out of poverty in the country between 2014 and 2019, according to a UN report.

The information was revealed in the Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2020 released on Thursday by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI).

“Bangladesh is the third country in the South Asian region among the 16 fastest countries to reduce their Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) value. Of the 65 countries that reduced their MPI value, 50 also reduced the number of people living in poverty. In Bangladesh, 19 million people were lifted out of poverty in the country between 2014 and 2019,” said the report.

As the UN report notes, the national poverty line is at 24.6%.

“It is 10 years before 2030, the due date of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), whose first goal is to end poverty in all its forms everywhere,” said the report.

The SDGs aim to make equitable progress, which means prioritizing interventions for the poorest of the poor. Bangladesh shows a clear pro-poor trend, with the poorest regions generally reducing their MPIT value the fastest in absolute terms, it stated.

As the poorest regions in 2014-19, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa had the largest annualized absolute reductions in multidimensional poverty.

Three South Asian countries, Bangladesh, India and Nepal, were among the 16 fastest countries to reduce their MPIT value, it added.
The MPI score starts from 0 to 1, where higher values mean higher poverty.

Among South Asian nations, Bangladesh scored 0.104, which is better than India’s 0.123, Nepal on 0.148, Bhutan on 0.175, Pakistan on 0.198 and Afghanistan on 0.272.

Bangladesh is behind the Maldives and Sri Lanka, which scored 0.003 and 0.011 respectively.

However, the lockdown to stop the spread of coronavirus has left 16.4 million people under the poverty line, as revealed by data from the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS).

Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, progress was being made in tackling multidimensional poverty, according to the global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) - a measure that looks beyond income to include access to safe water, education, electricity, food and six other indicators. Now that progress is at risk.

“Covid-19 is having a profound impact on the development landscape, but this data from before the pandemic is a message of hope.

Past success stories on how to tackle poverty can show how to rebuild better and improve the lives of millions,” said Sabina Alkire, director of OPHI at the University of Oxford.

In addition, Covid-19 is the latest crisis to hit the globe and climate change all but guarantees more will follow soon. Each will affect the poor in multiple ways, said Pedro Conçeicão, director of the Human Development Report Office at UNDP.”

“More than ever, we need to work on tackling poverty – and vulnerability to poverty - in all its forms. This is why the MPI is so important,” said Pedro.

Across the 107 developing countries, 1.3 billion people or 22% live in multidimensional poverty, where children show higher rates of multidimensional poverty.

The findings show that half of multidimensional poor people are children under age 18 and one in three children is poor compared with one in six adults.

About 84.3% of multidimensional poor people live in Sub-Saharan Africa (558 million) and South Asia (530 million).
 
If you got facts and figures then argue with those.

Otherwise khamoshi is a better option.

BTW - Bangladesh did better at reducing MPI than India did until 2019. Not sure after covid, no data.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bangladesh reduces multidimensional poverty​

Ibrahim Hossain Ovi
  • Published at 09:59 pm July 18th, 2020
aid to poor-food -poverty-mehedi hasan dt

A woman is standing with her child in her one hand and aid in her another hand Mehedi Hasan/Dhaka Tribune

19m people have been lifted out of poverty between 2014 and 2019

Bangladesh has significantly reduced multidimensional poverty and made substantial progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, as 19 million people were lifted out of poverty in the country between 2014 and 2019, according to a UN report.

The information was revealed in the Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2020 released on Thursday by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI).

“Bangladesh is the third country in the South Asian region among the 16 fastest countries to reduce their Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) value. Of the 65 countries that reduced their MPI value, 50 also reduced the number of people living in poverty. In Bangladesh, 19 million people were lifted out of poverty in the country between 2014 and 2019,” said the report.

As the UN report notes, the national poverty line is at 24.6%.

“It is 10 years before 2030, the due date of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), whose first goal is to end poverty in all its forms everywhere,” said the report.

The SDGs aim to make equitable progress, which means prioritizing interventions for the poorest of the poor. Bangladesh shows a clear pro-poor trend, with the poorest regions generally reducing their MPIT value the fastest in absolute terms, it stated.

As the poorest regions in 2014-19, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa had the largest annualized absolute reductions in multidimensional poverty.

Three South Asian countries, Bangladesh, India and Nepal, were among the 16 fastest countries to reduce their MPIT value, it added.
The MPI score starts from 0 to 1, where higher values mean higher poverty.

Among South Asian nations, Bangladesh scored 0.104, which is better than India’s 0.123, Nepal on 0.148, Bhutan on 0.175, Pakistan on 0.198 and Afghanistan on 0.272.

Bangladesh is behind the Maldives and Sri Lanka, which scored 0.003 and 0.011 respectively.

However, the lockdown to stop the spread of coronavirus has left 16.4 million people under the poverty line, as revealed by data from the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS).

Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, progress was being made in tackling multidimensional poverty, according to the global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) - a measure that looks beyond income to include access to safe water, education, electricity, food and six other indicators. Now that progress is at risk.

“Covid-19 is having a profound impact on the development landscape, but this data from before the pandemic is a message of hope.

Past success stories on how to tackle poverty can show how to rebuild better and improve the lives of millions,” said Sabina Alkire, director of OPHI at the University of Oxford.

In addition, Covid-19 is the latest crisis to hit the globe and climate change all but guarantees more will follow soon. Each will affect the poor in multiple ways, said Pedro Conçeicão, director of the Human Development Report Office at UNDP.”

“More than ever, we need to work on tackling poverty – and vulnerability to poverty - in all its forms. This is why the MPI is so important,” said Pedro.

Across the 107 developing countries, 1.3 billion people or 22% live in multidimensional poverty, where children show higher rates of multidimensional poverty.

The findings show that half of multidimensional poor people are children under age 18 and one in three children is poor compared with one in six adults.

About 84.3% of multidimensional poor people live in Sub-Saharan Africa (558 million) and South Asia (530 million).
Why should I argue anything ? Just commiserating and expressing my condolences to @RiazHaq in his hour of misery .

Just like I congratulate you on how well BD has done . Keep it up .

PS: I do hope you didn’t brag all that about BD just to rub it into @RiazHaq’s wounds even further . Guy is a basket case as it is without your doings
 
Last edited:
In the absence of real data, India's stats are all being manufactured by BJP to win elections.

Postponing India’s census is terrible for the country
But it may suit Narendra Modi just fine

https://www.economist.com/asia/2023/01/05/postponing-indias-census-is-terrible-for-the-country


Narendra Modi often overstates his achievements. For example, the Hindu-nationalist prime minister’s claim that all Indian villages have been electrified on his watch glosses over the definition: only public buildings and 10% of households need a connection for the village to count as such. And three years after Mr Modi declared India “open-defecation free”, millions of villagers are still purging al fresco. An absence of up-to-date census information makes it harder to check such inflated claims. It is also a disaster for the vast array of policymaking reliant on solid population and development data.

----------

Three years ago India’s government was scheduled to pose its citizens a long list of basic but important questions. How many people live in your house? What is it made of? Do you have a toilet? A car? An internet connection? The answers would refresh data from the country’s previous census in 2011, which, given India’s rapid development, were wildly out of date. Because of India’s covid-19 lockdown, however, the questions were never asked.

Almost three years later, and though India has officially left the pandemic behind, there has been no attempt to reschedule the decennial census. It may not happen until after parliamentary elections in 2024, or at all. Opposition politicians and development experts smell a rat.

----------

For a while policymakers can tide themselves over with estimates, but eventually these need to be corrected with accurate numbers. “Right now we’re relying on data from the 2011 census, but we know our results will be off by a lot because things have changed so much since then,” says Pronab Sen, a former chairman of the National Statistical Commission who works on the household-consumption survey. And bad data lead to bad policy. A study in 2020 estimated that some 100m people may have missed out on food aid to which they were entitled because the distribution system uses decade-old numbers.

Similarly, it is important to know how many children live in an area before building schools and hiring teachers. The educational misfiring caused by the absence of such knowledge is particularly acute in fast-growing cities such as Delhi or Bangalore, says Narayanan Unni, who is advising the government on the census. “We basically don’t know how many people live in these places now, so proper planning for public services is really hard.”

The home ministry, which is in charge of the census, continues to blame its postponement on the pandemic, most recently in response to a parliamentary question on December 13th. It said the delay would continue “until further orders”, giving no time-frame for a resumption of data-gathering. Many statisticians and social scientists are mystified by this explanation: it is over a year since India resumed holding elections and other big political events.
It is quite apparent, even to a person with limited knowledge, that a region or state with higher standards of living for its residents will generally exhibit a greater average life expectancy and lower rates of infant and maternal mortality. If one were to compare India and Pakistan based on these indicators, the actual situation would become evident.
 
Good job. Indian people are hardworking.

Although rising Hindu extremism remains a huge threat to India's development.
 

Back
Top Bottom