What's new

Attacks on ISAF Supply Convoys

daredevil

BANNED
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
711
Reaction score
0
More Than 160 US, NATO Vehicles Burned in Pakistan

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 6:24 a.m. ET

PESHAWAR, Pakistan (AP) -- Militants blasted their way into two transport terminals in Pakistan on Sunday and torched more than 160 vehicles destined for U.S.-led troops in Afghanistan, in the biggest assault yet on a vital military supply line, officials said.

The U.S. military said its losses in the raid near the northwestern city of Peshawar would have only a ''minimal'' impact on its operations against resurgent Taliban-led militants in Afghanistan.

However, the attack's boldness will fuel concern that Taliban militants are tightening their hold around Peshawar and could choke the supply route through the famed Khyber Pass.

Up to 75 percent of supplies for Western forces in landlocked Afghanistan pass through Pakistan after being unloaded from ships at the Arabian sea port of Karachi. NATO is already seeking an alternative route through Central Asia.

The attack at the Portward Logistic Terminal reduced a section of the vast walled compound to a smoldering junkyard.

Terminal manager Kifayatullah Khan said armed men flattened the gate before dawn with a rocket-propelled grenade, shot dead a guard and set fire to a total of 106 vehicles, including about 70 Humvees.

An Associated Press reporter who visited the depot saw six rows of destroyed Humvees and military trucks parked close together, some of them on flatbed trailers, all of them gutted and twisted by the flames.

Khan said shipping documents showed they were destined for U.S. forces and the Western-trained Afghan National Army.

The attackers fled after a brief exchange of fire with police, who arrived about 40 minutes later, Khan said.

The nine other guards who were on duty but stood helplessly aside put the number of assailants at 300, Khan said, though police official Kashif Alam said there were only 30.

At the nearby Faisal depot, manager Shah Iran said 60 vehicles destined for Afghanistan as well as three Pakistani trucks were burned in a similar assault.

It was unclear if one or two bands of gunmen were involved.

The attack was the latest in a series that have highlighted the vulnerability of the supply route to the spreading power of the Taliban and other Islamic militants in the border region.

Suspected insurgents also attacked the Faisal terminal last week and burned 12 trucks loaded with NATO supplies, including several Humvees. Two guards were shot dead.

In November, militants made off with a Humvee during a raid on the treacherous road from Peshawar to the Afghan border and showed it off later to reporters at a militant stronghold further south.

The U.S. military in Afghanistan said in a statement that an unspecified number of U.S. containers were destroyed in the attack but that it would have ''minimal effect on our operations.''

''It's militarily insignificant,'' U.S. spokeswoman Lt. Col. Rumi Nielsen-Green said. ''You can't imagine the volume of supplies that come through there and elsewhere and other ways.''

''So far there hasn't been a significant loss or impact to our mission,'' she said.

Pakistan halted traffic through the Khyber Pass for several days in November while it arranged for troops to guard the slow-moving convoys.

However, Khan, the depot manager, complained that no extra security was provided to the terminals.

He said his business, which handles some 600 truckloads a month for foreign troops in Afghanistan, had received repeated threats. He didn't want to discuss whom they were from for fear of incurring further wrath.

''We don't feel safe here at all,'' he said. ''It is almost impossible for us to continue with this business.''

Peshawar has seen a surge in violence in recent weeks, including the slaying of an American working on a U.S.-funded aid project.

The city lies close to the lawless tribal regions along the Afghan border, where Osama bin Laden and other top al-Qaida leaders are believed to be hiding.

On Saturday, a car bomb detonated in a busy market area of the city, killing 29 people and injuring 100 more. The blast wrecked a Shiite Muslim mosque and a hotel, but the motive and culprits remained unclear.

The instability in Pakistan's northwest coincides with serious tensions with its eastern neighbor India in the wake of recent terrorist attacks in Mumbai.

New Delhi blames the attack, which killed 171 people, on an Islamic militant group fighting Indian rule in the disputed Kashmir region, heightening tension between the nuclear-armed neighbors that could distract Pakistan from its role in helping the U.S. fight terrorism.

------

Associated Press writers Heigi Vogt and Jason Straziuso in Kabul contributed to this report.
 
Well, they seem to be getting bold by the day.

Until they get their appointed date with the Drone of course. ;)
 
If they succeed in forcing NATO to develop alternate supply routes into Afghanistan, it will only further worsen Pakistan's economy and its influence with the US. Imagine if the US did not have to worry about its supply line through Pakistan? How many drone attacks would there be then? These people are doing Pakistan no favors, even though they are cheered heartily and frequently, by posters here. I hope the US does shift its supply lines, even if it cost more. It would give us more "freedom of action".
 
Financial gains are not everything.

Pakistan has achieved the maximum benefit by supporting the US mission in Afghanistan and it is high time that GoP set a time table with the US to end the passage of goods through Pakistan.

There will be a financial loss but these suicide bomobings will reduce.

It will also increase support for the fragile GoP if goods are not transported through Pakistan.

This is one of the desires of most Pakistanis.

ISAF is better off with a Pakistan which is suppporting WoT by ensuring that majority of tribals are not taking part in Afghanistan.

There are far too many resources allocated in guarding the convoys etc and above all it is irritating to an everyday Pakistani. :pakistan:
 
Excuse me, but terrorists are not cheered by 99% of the crowd here.

They are not fighting for Pakistan but against us.
 
If they succeed in forcing NATO to develop alternate supply routes into Afghanistan, it will only further worsen Pakistan's economy and its influence with the US. Imagine if the US did not have to worry about its supply line through Pakistan? How many drone attacks would there be then? These people are doing Pakistan no favors, even though they are cheered heartily and frequently, by posters here. I hope the US does shift its supply lines, even if it cost more. It would give us more "freedom of action" .

Don't woory about "freedom", you'll bully the rest of the world to justify your actions anyway. :disagree:

Drone attacks undermine our souvereignity, it has to stop. Let US/Nato Forces fence the border to stop cross border insurgencies, for sure you can provide funds with your $14 trillion economy. Its a cheaper solution than losing soldiers in action or civilians getting illed.
 
Well, they seem to be getting bold by the day.

Until they get their appointed date with the Drone of course. ;)

You are missing the point that drones are never on target.
Drones have killed more women and children than any sort of male adults.
Infect, history says the real terrorists were never targeted by drones orany thing, despite vrious requests of Pak Army.
Situation on ground is security forces on Afghan side are not guarding the borders and forbid Pakstan for any sort of barrocation or any similar plan.
The moment Pakistan security forces give their position to NATO and US forces the information is being relayed to terrorists without any delay and if Pak army attempt surprise patrol than drones are directed at Pakistan army.
Drones have so far only facilitated terorists to smuggel RDX and sucide bombers into Pakistan.
 
If they succeed in forcing NATO to develop alternate supply routes into Afghanistan, it will only further worsen Pakistan's economy and its influence with the US. Imagine if the US did not have to worry about its supply line through Pakistan? How many drone attacks would there be then? These people are doing Pakistan no favors, even though they are cheered heartily and frequently, by posters here. I hope the US does shift its supply lines, even if it cost more. It would give us more "freedom of action".
You've got to be kidding me..most of the people on this board are actually anti taliban.Are you blind or what?
 
You've got to be kidding me..most of the people on this board are actually anti taliban.Are you blind or what?

Truthseeker seems to be going in opposite direction.
 
You are missing the point that drones are never on target.
Drones have killed more women and children than any sort of male adults.
Infect, history says the real terrorists were never targeted by drones orany thing, despite vrious requests of Pak Army.
Situation on ground is security forces on Afghan side are not guarding the borders and forbid Pakstan for any sort of barrocation or any similar plan.
The moment Pakistan security forces give their position to NATO and US forces the information is being relayed to terrorists without any delay and if Pak army attempt surprise patrol than drones are directed at Pakistan army.
Drones have so far only facilitated terorists to smuggel RDX and sucide bombers into Pakistan.

There are reports that their accuracy is quite good now because of improved intelligence and co-operation from Pakistan. Do visit the drone thread.
 
You've got to be kidding me..most of the people on this board are actually anti taliban.Are you blind or what?

I guess it is hard to tell for me sometimes. There are quite a variety of posters. Some seem to relish any difficulties the US is experiencing anywhere but especially in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Sorry to paint with such a broad brush. My apologies.
 
I guess it is hard to tell for me sometimes. There are quite a variety of posters. Some seem to relish any difficulties the US is experiencing anywhere but especially in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Sorry to paint with such a broad brush. My apologies.
Trust me there are dumb people in every country.There are many dumb people in Pakistan and in other countries like India, USA, England etc.You should just ignore Jihadi posters :cheers:
 
TruthSeeker,

I remember what you wrote in your intro and I for one welcome anyone who's sincerely interested in Pakistani affairs. Imho you'll learn a lot more if you put your misperception of Pakistan aside and try to interact more with this "variety of posters" to understand the dynamics which have formed Pakistan.

This board gives you the opportunity to tap as much as you can take, you won't find a better place to get answers. Don't ruin it.
 
Let US/Nato Forces fence the border to stop cross border insurgencies, for sure you can provide funds with your $14 trillion economy. Its a cheaper solution than losing soldiers in action or civilians getting illed.

Neo,
You know that "fencing the Afghani-Pakastani border is not a feasible solution. The terrain and local sentiment would never permit it. Why offer that up as a credible solution?
 
Neo,
You know that "fencing the Afghani-Pakastani border is not a feasible solution. The terrain and local sentiment would never permit it. Why offer that up as a credible solution?
Sir, Pakistan did try to fence the border but Afghani soldiers destroyed it.Honestly we're doing whatever we can do to get rid of this cancer (extremism) What more do you want us to do?Thousands of Pakistanis have died in suicide attacks.Aren't Pakistanis Human?
 

Back
Top Bottom