"Drones are using Pakistan's airspace to enter Afghanistan's and target us.

[Mugen]

Pakistan allowing airspace to US means Taliban pissed off which will result in Taliban and TTP coalition to strike targets in Pakistan that would result in security situation in Pakistan.

If TTP is striking Pakistan, then the onus should be on Pakistan’s defense forces to strike TTP even if it means going inside Afghanistan.

Giving your airspace to the Americans is FUQQING counterproductive. FFS.

It's okay, Pakistani generals are prepared to fight the American war till the last Pakistani citizen.

 

[imadul]

Taliban proved to be a wrong bet again by Military Establishment.
There is not much difference between TTP and TTA. The latter don't themselves attack Pakistan just Harbour TTP.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Pakistan allowing airspace to US means Taliban pissed off which will result in Taliban and TTP coalition to strike targets in Pakistan that would result in security situation in Pakistan.

If TTP is striking Pakistan, then the onus should be on Pakistan’s defense forces to strike TTP even if it means going inside Afghanistan.

Giving your airspace to the Americans is FUQQING counterproductive. FFS.

They're doing that anyway. As it is the americans who are bombing iea, do these retards not want to fight against them? Or at the very least not condemn them? It is not Pakistan who is bombing them so why blame us? Or is iea and the ttp showing that they are the biggest kuffars on planet earth who worship amercians and white european people?

 

[ghazi52]

..,

‘Highly regrettable’: FO rejects Afghan Taliban’s claim that Pakistani airspace was used for Zawahiri hit​

Naveed Siddiqui | AFP
August 29, 2022

The Foreign Office (FO) on Sunday rejected the Afghan Taliban’s claims about Pakistani airspace being used for the US strike that killed Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.

The FO’s response came after, earlier in the day, Afghan Defence Minister Mohammad Yaqoob Mujahid accused Pakistan of providing airspace for US drones to enter his country, saying the incursions were a continuation of Washington’s “invasion”.

Mujahid’s comments came less than a month after US President Joe Biden announced al-Zawahiri’s killing in a drone strike in Kabul.

US drones continued to be seen flying over Kabul even now, Mujahid said.

“Our information shows that they (US drones) are entering into Afghanistan from Pakistan, using the airspace of Pakistan,” Mujahid told reporters when asked where the drones were coming from.

“We demand that Pakistan should not allow its airspace to be used against us.”

Deploying these drones into Afghanistan is “still a clear invasion of Afghanistan and its airspace by the Americans”, Mujahid said.

“They are doing this shamelessly. We condemn this illegal act and demand that the Americans put an end to it.”

The drone attack in July that killed Zawahiri, Al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden’s successor, was the first known strike by the US on a target in Afghanistan since Washington withdrew its forces from the country on August 31 last year.

Mujahid said the authorities were investigating Biden’s claims of killing Zawahiri. “We will share the details when it is complete,” he said.

Responding to the Taliban claims, FO Spokesperson Asim Iftikhar Ahmad issued a press release, saying that Pakistan had noted Mujahid’s allegation’s with “deep concern”.

“In the absence of any evidence, as acknowledged by the afghan minister himself, such conjectural allegations are highly regrettable and defy the norms of responsible diplomatic conduct.

“Pakistan reaffirms its belief in the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states and condemns terrorism in all its forms and manifestations,” the press release reads.

The FO urged Afghan authorities to “ensure the fulfilment” of international commitments made by Afghanistan to not allow the use of its territory for terrorism against any country.

Border tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan have risen since the Taliban seized power last year, with Islamabad claiming militant groups are carrying out regular attacks from the neighbouring country.

 

[LakeHawk180]

I wonder if the taliban dream of one day ruling all of af-pak region. If they are, then all of this makes sense to me.

It would be pure delusion on their part. But it would make sense.

 

[SaadH]

Yeah if you were to believe Army brats here, the drones are flying from Moscow, Beijing and Tehran, definitely not Pakistan.

 

[ziaulislam]

And TTP terrorists are coming from your space to target us. Tough sh**, huh?

To paraphrase you… maybe we can suggest a dialogue with the Americans, which is all we are prepared to facilitate.

So why doesnt PAF just bombs places it want?
Or do we think drones will be targetting TTP

 

[SaadH]

I fear, some section of Taliban movement have not learnt anything from their 9/11 disaster of harbouring terrorists ….. attacking your brother kin in Pakistan will bring you nothing but disaster

What about the brothers who started this by giving bases and air corridors to NATO/US to attack Afghanistan in the first place long before the "terrorists" started attacking Pakistan in retaliation?

 

[blain2]

Pakistan allowing airspace to US means Taliban pissed off which will result in Taliban and TTP coalition to strike targets in Pakistan that would result in security situation in Pakistan.

If TTP is striking Pakistan, then the onus should be on Pakistan’s defense forces to strike TTP even if it means going inside Afghanistan.

Giving your airspace to the Americans is FUQQING counterproductive. FFS.

Instead of mindlessly buying into the EA propaganda of blaming Pakistan for these attacks, do realize that Americans have countless options for drone strikes including stations in multiple xstans. Taliban are clueless. They have no idea where the drone came from and when and what it hit. How would they know where the drone came from when not a single air defense radar is in working order in that country? The EA army chief himself said this.

Our own idiots like Fawad Chaudhry were unnecessarily dragging Pakistan into controversy by asking whose airspace was used. It is none of our business. The GoP should stay clear and let the EA and the Americans sort it out themselves and vociferously rebut EA propaganda.

 

[Ghazwa-e-Hind]

Our relations with IEA govt will not improve until we stop taking orders from NATO & Uncle Sam.

 

[blain2]

Our relations with IEA govt will not improve until we stop taking orders from NATO & Uncle Sam.

We are not taking any orders. Not sure why you keep on pointing fingers at ourselves when you yourself have no evidence of it. It seems you'd prefer to take the words of EA over our own people. There is a limit to party politics. At one point in time, you have to get behind the flag.

 

[kingQamaR]

What about the brothers who started this by giving bases and air corridors to NATO/US to attack Afghanistan in the first place long before the "terrorists" started attacking Pakistan in retaliation?

I won’t disagree or argue with you on that I was totally against what mushraf regime was doing in Pakistan name. it would have also been better in hindsight, had the Taliban just expelled that lunatic group back to Saudis saved us all from this nightmare of war on terror

 

[blain2]

I won’t disagree or argue with you on that I was totally against what mushraf regime was doing in Pakistan name. it would have also been better in hindsight, had the Taliban just expelled that lunatic group back to Saudis saved us all from this nightmare of war on terror

Would/could don't make for national policy. It was the GoP and the ISI that was doing all the shuttling back and forth to Mullah Omar and Taliban about sending the group in question out of Afghanistan but the Taliban were not willing. Pakistan had no choice in the matter itself once Taliban and the Americans could not come to an agreement. The Saudis just stayed out of it although it was their man to bring back.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

What about the brothers who started this by giving bases and air corridors to NATO/US to attack Afghanistan in the first place long before the "terrorists" started attacking Pakistan in retaliation?

The russians, tajiks and gcc nations ALL provided bases for the americans/nato to attack afghanistan. Why is it that Pakistan ONLY gets the blame? Also, as it is the americans/nato bombing the af-ghands, why don't they take their grievances with them and fight them? What has this got to do with Pakistan? Do the americans/nato get a free ride by the KUFFAR taliban and the iea as they both worship americans and white europeans? The af-ghands have some SEVERE retarded logic and low IQ. Also afghans were helping the americans/nato kill other afghans. Yet the iea/taliban NEVER complained. F**K afghands, iea, ttp and all of these scumbags.

 

[arslank03]

Our relations with IEA govt will not improve until we stop taking orders from NATO & Uncle Sam.

What is it with our people and wanting to lick everyones balls? Turks, Chinese, Iranians and now Afghans.

The IEA will never cut off the TTP as it is their strategic pawn of sorts to keep Pakistan in check. Where do terrorists come into Pak from? Afghanistan. The IEA is not friendly towards Pak, they claim half of our land and do not recognize the borders, they will bleed us. The previous regime was hostile but it kept the terrorists in check, meaning attacks were a little less. The IEA knows very well that they can have Pak wrapped around their finger, they have links with Indians, Iranians, Balochis, other splinter groups and moreover the TTP. If the US is drone striking HVTs, so be it, they will cause us problems. If Pak is striking HVTs, thats quite telling because the IEA said there will be no terrorists hosted. Evidently, the IEA cant be trusted since they are breaking the Doha agreement and also their words. Surprisingly, the IEA owes us nothing and will do whats in its favour, they ramped up significantly the price of coal for Pak, not because theyre out friends, but because they have their interests in mind, not ours. Who Gives an F if the IEA and us have shit relations, our trade with them is minimal, vs the US and Europe, they are a MASSIVE security threat and a literal powder keg. The IEA are kafir terrorists yet our own are too busy wanting to appease rag-tag murderers actual politics with actual countries which will bring us ACTUAL benefits.