What's new

India fears sudden change in Bangladesh

When the puppet AL government falls it will definitely be a change...especially if the new government put priorities of national interests first and awarding India second!

Every BD govt has always put national interests first, thats why they are Bangladesh & not East Pakistan.:cheers:
 
You want to force your way with fantasies that India is communal.

If we were we would not have been the second largest Muslim population country or now, maybe third.

Indeed, MMS is not a moron.

discovery!!!

What you want to see, you may not see, since dreams do not always come true.

Do you possess ESP?

Bangladesh is made of so many people beyond you that none can tell what will happen,

For all you know you may rejoin Pakistan!

or the Biharis and Razaakars and the Jammaait take over the country by force!

Who knows?

wonders never cease!

Indians are in communal riots up-to their eye balls. Its the only democratic chest-thumping, secularity claiming, and what not nation in the known universe that do not afford justice to the victims of the religious slaughters.

The inability of the successive Governments to provide justice to the Sikh, Muslim victims act as a tacit approval of the State. The State is therefore conveying a message that minority maybe be slaughtered with impunity.

This does not happen anywhere else in Democratic world. It happens at least once in a decade in India.

However, events like 26/11 gets prosecuted, publicized, and claimed as India's 9/11 as the accused and convicted do not belong to the Majority. The Majority Indians will cry a river the size of mighty Brahmaputra on 26/11, but won't give a sh*t about the dead Sikhs or Muslims .

This decade is coming to an end, your kind need to fulfill the prophecy of one slaughter a decade with impunity.
 
That makes complete sense....

Since it was India that wanted to form a new country for muslims.....It was us who could not live with Hindus ......It all speaks for the communal mindedness of Indians....

If the bell hasnt rung for you already......It is India which has the 3rd largest Muslim population in the world with a healthy set of other minority groups that keep increasing in numbers Y.O.Y

See post #62.
 
Indians are in communal riots up-to their eye balls. Its the only democratic chest-thumping, secularity claiming, and what not nation in the known universe that do not afford justice to the victims of the religious slaughters.

The inability of the successive Governments to provide justice to the Sikh, Muslim victims act as a tacit approval of the State. The State is therefore conveying a message that minority maybe be slaughtered with impunity.

This does not happen anywhere else in Democratic world. It happens at least once in a decade in India.

However, events like 26/11 gets prosecuted, publicized, and claimed as India's 9/11 as the accused and convicted do not belong to the Majority. The Majority Indians will cry a river the size of mighty Brahmaputra on 26/11, but won't give a sh*t about the dead Sikhs or Muslims .

This decade is coming to an end, your kind need to fulfill the prophecy of one slaughter a decade with impunity.

I have already given a post on this subject and I am not in the habit of some BD posters to repeat the same for effect.

Check out the atrocities and killing in BD for yourself.

Heard of Ramna Kali Bari?

26/11 was a foreign planned and executed action.

Do your read international papers or merely those Bengali ones?
 
Yunus is that much a favourite of the US that he makes such a difference?

are you being a trifle dramatic?

The Nobel Laureate is a class fellow of Hillary, and a close friend of the Clinton couple. Hasina got after her for two reasons - firstly, he had shown political ambition when 2XBegums were in custody. Secondly, and this has made her sore, Yunus got the Nobel when she was hoping she would -because of the Chakma peace accord. The Americans had sent a couple of emissaries to arrange a patch up, without success; and even the US Ambassador was refused an interview by Hasina on this matter. Yankees don't appreciate these things.
 
MMS is usually careful with his words. Dont know why he made a negative statement about bangladesh when he is going to visit the same country soon.
 
MMS is usually careful with his words. Dont know why he made a negative statement about bangladesh when he is going to visit the same country soon.

Guess what, you get a brownie if you can solve the riddle!
Now guesstimate.....
 
JI never got more 5-7% vote, BJP, RSS and Shive sena gets more vote. Indians are communal, we are not, thats the fact. This guy is spreading lies so any agitation they would pin on JI.

BJP is communal by Indian standards, JI is communal even in Pakistan.

Fact is, Hindu population % in Bangladesh has kept falling consistently since 1947, in India it has gone up, for practically all minority groups. Indian Muslims are not running away to foreign countries, can't say that about your minorities. The proof of the pudding...

Case closed.

Why India fears sudden change - one has to just see the number of Indian terrorists harbored in BD by previous regimes and now handed over to India by the current government. This is typical circular logic deployed by Jamatis, who are nothing but rabidly communal and hate India only because its majority Hindu.
 
BJP is communal by Indian standards, JI is communal even in Pakistan.

Fact is, Hindu population % in Bangladesh has kept falling consistently since 1947, in India it has gone up, for practically all minority groups. Indian Muslims are not running away to foreign countries, can't say that about your minorities. The proof of the pudding...

India is Hindu holy land and there is no harm in Hindus preferring that country over its motherland.

There are lots of theory regarding increase of Muslim population all over the world. The main reason high reproductivity and 2nd is conversion. India is no different despite repeated riots and all, Muslim population increasing.


Case closed.

Why India fears sudden change - one has to just see the number of Indian terrorists harbored in BD by previous regimes and now handed over to India by the current government. This is typical circular logic deployed by Jamatis, who are nothing but rabidly communal and hate India only because its majority Hindu.

You dont know the difference between Communal and Fundamnetalist.

Jamaat is a islamic fundamentalist party with an agenda of Islamic laws and constitution. BJP in India is a communal party which incite hatred and violence against Muslim to gain votes. Jamat will never say a single word against non muslims.
 
BJP is communal by Indian standards, JI is communal even in Pakistan.

Fact is, Hindu population % in Bangladesh has kept falling consistently since 1947, in India it has gone up, for practically all minority groups. Indian Muslims are not running away to foreign countries, can't say that about your minorities. The proof of the pudding...

Case closed.

Why India fears sudden change - one has to just see the number of Indian terrorists harbored in BD by previous regimes and now handed over to India by the current government. This is typical circular logic deployed by Jamatis, who are nothing but rabidly communal and hate India only because its majority Hindu.

The highest number of seats JI ever got is I belive is 19. Which clearly tells you how much people care about JI politics. There is no support among the general population for this kind of politics. Period.

Same can't be said about your land. Communal politics of BJP and RSS has been endorsed by Indian Supreme Court,

The Bombay High Court had set aside the elections of these candidates mainly on the ground that they had committed a corrupt practice as defined by Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The corrupt practice defined in Section 123(3) consists of "the appeal by a candidate or his agent or by any other person with the consent of a candidate or his election agent to vote or refrain from voting for any person on the ground of his religion…"

Supreme court judgment: a blow to secular democracy

The Supreme Court Bench has further observed that "the mere fact that these words (Hindutva or Hinduism) are used in the speech would not bring in within the prohibition of sub-section (3) or (3A) of Section 123. It may well be that these words are used in the speech to promote secularism and to emphasize the way of life of the Indian people and the Indian culture or ethos, or to criticize the policy of any political party as discriminatory or intolerant. Whether a particular speech in which a reference is made to Hindutva and or Hinduism falls within the prohibition under sub-section (3) or (3A) of Section 123 is therefore a question of fact in each case" (Emphasis supplied).

These conclusions of the Supreme Court Bench clearly mean that if a candidate were to declare that he believed in Hindutva and therefore the voters should cast their votes in his favour, without saying anything more, he would not be committing any corrupt practice as defined by the Section 123 (3) of the Act.
He may, according to the Supreme Court Bench, be referring to the culture of the Indian people as a whole including Muslims, Christians and all other non-Hindu citizens.

Supreme court judgment: a blow to secular democracy
 
The Nobel Laureate is a class fellow of Hillary, and a close friend of the Clinton couple. Hasina got after her for two reasons - firstly, he had shown political ambition when 2XBegums were in custody. Secondly, and this has made her sore, Yunus got the Nobel when she was hoping she would -because of the Chakma peace accord. The Americans had sent a couple of emissaries to arrange a patch up, without success; and even the US Ambassador was refused an interview by Hasina on this matter. Yankees don't appreciate these things.

The day when being classmates contribute to foreign policy decision when one of them isn't even a politician, that will be the day!

Nobel Laureates maybe a novelty in Bangladesh, they are a dime to a dozen in the US.

Sant Chatwal is a good friend of Manmohan Singh and the Clintons, Murli Deora is their bum chum, Clintons claim they love India........but that does not mean that the US Foreign Policy will change to be all for India! Daydreams!
 
India is Hindu holy land and there is no harm in Hindus preferring that country over its motherland.

There are lots of theory regarding increase of Muslim population all over the world. The main reason high reproductivity and 2nd is conversion. India is no different despite repeated riots and all, Muslim population increasing.




You dont know the difference between Communal and Fundamnetalist.

Jamaat is a islamic fundamentalist party with an agenda of Islamic laws and constitution. BJP in India is a communal party which incite hatred and violence against Muslim to gain votes. Jamat will never say a single word against non muslims.

India maybe a Holy land for Hindus, but sadly there are others who also exist in India and it is not their Holy Land.

Further, unlike Islamic countries, religion is not the be all and end all in India.

That is why there is no restriction who is the President, Prime Minister, Minister, Chief Justice, Chief of the Military and so on.

There is no repeated riots in India. And the ones we have had, we don't live in denial like others and instead keep them alive in the public mind to warn all of the pitfalls as also demand till justice is met.

Jammait does not say a single word against non Muslims, because they merely kill. More effective from the ethnic cleansing point of view.

If Bangladesh was such a tolerant country, then how come Hindus are such a minuscule?

BJP came to power not as BJP but by having a coalition with 17 other political parties!!

And Atal Bihari Vajpayee the PM (belonging to the BJP) was the first PM to start a dialogue with Pakistan (who are Muslims) for Peace!!!!!!!!

That much for your convulsed reasoning.
 

Back
Top Bottom