What's new

Indian Army puts up imposing firepower display with indigenous artillery guns

I don't believe on any such things... If needed, Chinese can mobilize her max resources to indian borders.
But how on earth they'll be deploying their max resources towards the LAC, if 🇮🇳 starts bombing their supply lines?
If IAF is successful in neutralizing their two airfields in each sector then it'll have severe repercussions on their operations against India. And by the way they're facing more powerful adversaries on the Eastern seaboard like US and NATO. How they're going to ignore that threat?
 
But how on earth they'll be deploying your max resources towards the LAC if 🇮🇳 starts bombing their supply lines?
If IAF is successful in neutralizing their two airfields in each sector then it'll have severe repercussions on their operations against India. And by the way they're facing more powerful adversaries on the Eastern seaboard like US and NATO. How they're going to ignore that threat?

Don't talk as same like pakistani friends... They also talk the same way against the war with India and expect they can win against India.

Nato Or any other will not going to open their front for India. China can maintain minimum resources and mostly mobilize hew max resources to indian borders.......... India will also do the same against Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
garuda-105-mobile-artillery-system-2.jpg



This will be perfect for mountain warfare.
 
Nato Or any other will not going to front for India. China can maintain minimum resources and mostly mobilize hew max resources to indian borders..........
The scope of employment of air power by PLAAF in war scenarios would no doubt be limited considering the terrain involved with heights touching 17,000 feet above the mean sea level testing the limits of human endurance. Even the reportedly limited air activity by the Chinese in the Tawang region needs to be noted especially J11s from airfields across the LAC such as Hogan, Kashgar and Gar Gunsa. Another fighter-capable airfield is being developed at Shakche. But regardless of the buildup of the border infrastructure by the adversary, the Chinese are handicapped in terms of air power projection such as load and range limitation. Another limitation, of course applicable to both sides, would be the shrunk radar horizons, thanks to the terrain.
The case is, at such altitudes, you need a minimum speed to maintain enough lift to not stall. Maneuvers and other things require even higher relative speed to the wing.

So, the higher the altitude, thinner the air, greater the stall speed. Now, the problem does not end here. Due to the high variability of temperature throughout the day (freezing cold at night and ~20 deg. in day), combined with humidity conditions, the density of air keeps on changing dynamically, which cause erratic lift patterns, especially for aircraft with a low aerofoil (fighter jets).

To water down what I wrote above, a fighter jet will be able to take off with a long runaway run in morning and evening timeframes, at noon, it might overshoot the runaway with the same payload.

Ah, did I mention higher take-off and landing speeds (required for high-altitude runaways) cause more wear-and-tear of landing gear and frequent tire bursts ?

Don't talk as same like pakistani friends... They also talk the same way against the war with India and expect they can win against India
I'm talking on technical terms not some random fantasy stories put out by the Pakistani's on PDF
 
was there any sikh sergeant shouting: oy sorey dia load kar jaldi, oi mein keha jaldi kar teri pehn di... etc. etc. :

or have they all been fired?
 
Don't talk as same like pakistani friends... They also talk the same way against the war with India and expect they can win against India.

Nato Or any other will not going to open their front for India. China can maintain minimum resources and mostly mobilize hew max resources to indian borders.......... India will also do the same against Pakistan.

The average height of Tibet is 14,500 Feet.

Do you know what is the Oxygen level at that height ? Roughly 55% of that at sea Level.

Do you know what hat does to the human body and human mind ? Especially long term exposer if you are not built for it?

Do you know what is the average temperature at Tibet ? its 12 degrees in day and -5 degrees at Night.

Do you know what that does to your moral, spirit and body ?

Do you know how harsh the terrain and geography is in Tibet ? Where NOTHING grows and there is NO WATER to be found and Lights reflecting off the peaks gives you snow blindness ? Where the gravel is loose and slope is slippery and injuries common but take a LONG time to heal in the cold ?

You know what that does to the human body and mind ?

Only an ignorant fool would think its possible for china to sustain a massive long term campaign over Tibet.

Its not humanly possible.

I am not even going to talk about the effect it has on machines and lack of logistics and repair depots and efficiency of engines at those oxygen depleted heights and slopes.

So NO, its not humanly possible for china to sustain any attack on India from Tibet. Best they can do is lob missiles and bombs, but cannot put boots on the ground. But India CAN.
 
But how on earth they'll be deploying their max resources towards the LAC, if 🇮🇳 starts bombing their supply lines?
If IAF is successful in neutralizing their two airfields in each sector then it'll have severe repercussions on their operations against India. And by the way they're facing more powerful adversaries on the Eastern seaboard like US and NATO. How they're going to ignore that threat?
let's stay humble and not make boastful and unrealistic comments like our pakistani friends here
 
Abey dhakkan, if its not humanly possible, was it superhuman chinese from alternate reality who invaded from the same Tibetan plateau in 1962 and captured Arunachal in less than a month:lol:. That was when their GDP was the same as that of India, now it is 5 times more. Layoff the gau mutra, it will help you think better. While you are ranting about what they can and cannot do they have already occupied 600 sq km in Eastern Ladakh

Which is why I said "Only an ignorant fool would think its possible for china to sustain a massive long term campaign over Tibet.".

You would have known this if you knew how to read and then understand what you have read.

China abandoned Arunachal because they could not sustain that campaign. Have you heard of any other nation abandoning Captured territory ?

Increase in GDP does not mean it gives humans the ability to live on 50% less Oxygen.

Now that I know u'r a muslim , are you also a false flagger ? Plenty of those around in pdf.
 
While you are ranting about what they can and cannot do they have already occupied 600 sq km in Eastern Ladakh
Many of these patrol points were in Chinese claimed areas. You'll need a war/ conflict to take it. We just walked (patrolled) because it was empty. Now they've put an end to it

We have roads/army post in aksai chin.
We claim entire aksai chin . LAC - line of "actual control " is behind .
We used to patrol along the LAC in depsang inside aksai chin , chinese are blocking at few places now.
 

Back
Top Bottom