What's new

National Geographic on Kashmir Dispute

MultaniGuy

BANNED
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
12,243
Reaction score
-6
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
The Kashmir conflict: How did it start?
The dispute between India and Pakistan over Kashmir was sparked by a fateful decision in 1947, and has resulted in decades of violence, including two wars.

ByErin Blakemore
Published March 2, 2019
• 5 min read
Since 1947, India and Pakistan have been locked in conflict over Kashmir, a majority-Muslim region in the northernmost part of India. The mountainous, 86,000-square-mile territory was once a princely state. Now, it is claimed by both India and Pakistan.
The roots of the conflict lie in the countries’ shared colonial past. From the 17th to the 20th century, Britain ruled most of the Indian subcontinent, first indirectly through the British East India Company, then from 1858 directly through the British crown. Over time, Britain’s power over its colony weakened, and a growing nationalist movement threatened the crown’s slipping rule.

ngm-1805-kashmir-map_ai2html-desktop-medium.jpg


CONTESTED TERRITORY

India and Pakistan both claim Kashmir—a disputed region of some

18 million people. India administers the area south of the Line of Control; Pakistan administers northwestern Kashmir. China took eastern Kashmir from India in a 1962 war.



Asia



AFGHANISTAN



Khunjerab Pass



Pakistan



India



Boundary claimed by India



Siachen

Glacier



Gilgit



CHINA



PAKISTAN



Boundary claimed by India



Skardu



Muzaffarabad



Leh



Abbottabad



Srinagar



JAMMU

AND KASHMIR



Boundary claimed by China



Islamabad



Boundary claimed by Pakistan



Jammu



Boundary claimed by China



INDIA



Amritsar



Lahore



50 mi



50 km



Chandigarh



NGM Maps


Though it feared civil war between India’s Hindu majority and Muslim minority, Britain faced increasing pressure to grant independence to its colony. After World War II, Parliament decided British rule in India should end by 1948.

Britain had historically had separate electorates for Muslim citizens and reserved some political seats specifically for Muslims; that not only hemmed Muslims into a minority status, but fueled a growing Muslim separatist movement. Mohammad Ali Jinnah, a politician who headed up India’s Muslim League, began demanding a separate nation for India’s Muslim population.
“It is high time that the British Government applied their mind definitely to the division of India and the establishment of Pakistan and Hindustan, which means freedom for both,” Jinnah said in 1945.
As religious riots broke out across British India, leaving tens of thousands dead, British and Indian leaders began to seriously consider a partition of the subcontinent based on religion. On August 14, 1947, the independent, Muslim-majority nation of Pakistan was formed. The Hindu-majority independent nation of India followed the next day.
Under the hasty terms of partition, more than 550 princely states within colonial India that were not directly governed by Britain could decide to join either new nation or remain independent.

Hari Singh

The maharaja of Kashmir, Hari Singh, in June 1946.
Photograph by AP

At the time, the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, which had a majority Muslim population, was governed by maharaja Hari Singh, a Hindu. Unlike most of the princely states which aligned themselves with one nation or the other, Singh wanted independence for Kashmir. To avert pressure to join either new nation, the maharaja signed a standstill agreement with Pakistan that allowed citizens of Kashmir to continue trade and travel with the new country. India did not sign a similar standstill agreement with the princely state.

As partition-related violence raged across the two new nations, the government of Pakistan pressured Kashmir to join it. Pro-Pakistani rebels, funded by Pakistan, took over much of western Kashmir, and in September 1947, Pashtun tribesmen streamed over the border from Pakistan into Kashmir. Singh asked for India’s help in staving off the invasion, but India responded that, in order to gain military assistance, Kashmir would have to accede to India, thus becoming part of the new country.
Singh agreed and signed the Instrument of Accession, the document that aligned Kashmir with the Dominion of India, in October 1947. Kashmir was later given special status within the Indian constitution—a status which guaranteed that Kashmir would have independence over everything but communications, foreign affairs, and defense. This special status was revoked by the Indian government in August 2019.
The maharaja's fateful decision to align Kashmir with India ushered in decades of conflict in the contested region, including two wars and a longstanding insurgency.
 
So the Maharaja was being dishonest. The Maharaja did not take the demographics and geography into consideration.
 
Last edited:
So the Maharaja was being dishonest. The Maharaja did not take the demographics and geography into consideration.

His desire for an independent Kashmir was not born out of some patriotic zeal or love for his people but rather the opposite. Him and his ancestors were brutul autocrats who essentially treated the the majority of the populace like slaves/serfs (Muslims). Only a minority elite made up of Hindu Dogra Rajputs and Brahmins of the valley enjoyed the Maharajahs benevolence.

Demographics and geography were therefore the last thing on Singh's mind. His only concern was ensuring a way for the system which ensured his dynastys iron grip on the region to survive. Since Nehru was clear on not tolerating Maharajahs in an indpendent India and Pakistan would not tolerate a bigot subjugating his Muslim populace to serfdom, his best bet was on claiming he wanted "independence" for Kashmir. He never had any honest intentions towards Pakistan.
 
His desire for an independent Kashmir was not born out of some patriotic zeal or love for his people but rather the opposite. Him and his ancestors were brutul autocrats who essentially treated the the majority of the populace like slaves/serfs (Muslims). Only a minority elite made up of Hindu Dogra Rajputs and Brahmins of the valley enjoyed the Maharajahs benevolence.

Demographics and geography were therefore the last thing on Singh's mind. His only concern was ensuring a way for the system which ensured his dynastys iron grip on the region to survive. Since Nehru was clear on not tolerating Maharajahs in an indpendent India and Pakistan would not tolerate a bigot subjugating his Muslim populace to serfdom, his best bet was on claiming he wanted "independence" for Kashmir. He never had any honest intentions towards Pakistan.
Yes, but also the Maharaja signed a standstill agreement with Pakistan before doing any deals with India.

It shows that the Maharaja knews Kashmir was connected to Pakistan geographically, economically, and culturally.

Also where is the Instrument of Accession. People say it is "lost."

There was some foul play here to screw Pakistan up big time.
His desire for an independent Kashmir was not born out of some patriotic zeal or love for his people but rather the opposite. Him and his ancestors were brutul autocrats who essentially treated the the majority of the populace like slaves/serfs (Muslims). Only a minority elite made up of Hindu Dogra Rajputs and Brahmins of the valley enjoyed the Maharajahs benevolence.

Demographics and geography were therefore the last thing on Singh's mind. His only concern was ensuring a way for the system which ensured his dynastys iron grip on the region to survive. Since Nehru was clear on not tolerating Maharajahs in an indpendent India and Pakistan would not tolerate a bigot subjugating his Muslim populace to serfdom, his best bet was on claiming he wanted "independence" for Kashmir. He never had any honest intentions towards Pakistan.
Even according to partition rules the princely state could accede to either Pakistan or India, BUT NEEDS TO TAKE THE DEMOGRAPHICS AND GEOGRAPHY INTO CONSIDERATION.

This so-called Maharaja was being dishonest.

So Pakistan has the moral and ethical arguments here. We have our rightful claim to Kashmir.

India just wanted land. How bloody stupid.
 
His desire for an independent Kashmir was not born out of some patriotic zeal or love for his people but rather the opposite. Him and his ancestors were brutul autocrats who essentially treated the the majority of the populace like slaves/serfs (Muslims). Only a minority elite made up of Hindu Dogra Rajputs and Brahmins of the valley enjoyed the Maharajahs benevolence.

Demographics and geography were therefore the last thing on Singh's mind. His only concern was ensuring a way for the system which ensured his dynastys iron grip on the region to survive. Since Nehru was clear on not tolerating Maharajahs in an indpendent India and Pakistan would not tolerate a bigot subjugating his Muslim populace to serfdom, his best bet was on claiming he wanted "independence" for Kashmir. He never had any honest intentions towards Pakistan.
I do not think remaining independent was part of the partition plan for the princely states.

Even Hyderabad princely state could have remained independent in Central India, but Nehru didn't accept that arrangement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TNT

Back
Top Bottom