What's new

Second Opinion: Kashmir bargain

the U.N security council seat and Kashmir are two completely separate issues

No there not......you would like them to be though.


....the GOI cannot compromise on territorial integrity ( a domestic matter ) in exchange for any "international status " symbol......in the face of our sovereignty

So that why the UN has people on the LOC and kashmir comes up as a disputed area in international maps?
 
Alright.......that must mean we can forget that the LeT is banned by the UN and restart the group?:cheers:

Pakistan can do whatever it wants to do? Who is stopping you? Did you really did it for the UN?

Anyways, you really think LeT has been abolished...lol.
 
No there not......you would like them to be though.

So that why the UN has people on the LOC and kashmir comes up as a disputed area in international maps?

Kashmir comes out disputed now and in time J&K will come out in Indian colours ....so called AK / GB in Pakistani colours ...and AS portion in Chinese colours......

meanwhile the world wont wait for the kashmir issue to be resolved ,before India is asked to take up responsibilities at the SC. Compared to the issues on the merit of which we lay a claim to a permanent veto seat at the U.N , Kashmir prob is nothing more than a pinprick.....
 
Alright.......that must mean we can forget that the LeT is banned by the UN and restart the group?:cheers:

Arey yaar who cares if you re-open the shops of LeT(they already operating under different labels and giving job vacancy ads in newspaper is another matter), but remember for every one mumbai these guys do 100 s of suicide bombings in Pak itself.

Take your pick.
 
Kashmir comes out disputed now

Just like i said.


and in time J&K will come out in Indian colours ....so called AK / GB in Pakistani colours ...and AS portion in Chinese colours......

Well it hasnt done so in the last 60 odd years has it ?

meanwhile the world wont wait for the kashmir issue to be resolved ,before India is asked to take up responsibilities at the SC. Compared to the issues on the merit of which we lay a claim to a permanent veto seat at the U.N , Kashmir prob is nothing more than a pinprick.....

Maybe your right....but i would say that the detractors to indian being made a member of the SC would bring up the issue of kashmir.
You must admit it sounds a bit hypocritical that you wont impliment UN resolutions but you want to a member of the SC.
 
Just like i said.




Well it hasnt done so in the last 60 odd years has it ?



Maybe your right....but i would say that the detractors to indian being made a member of the SC would bring up the issue of kashmir.
You must admit it sounds a bit hypocritical that you wont impliment UN resolutions but you want to a member of the SC.

The colors in the map does not matter. What matters is the ground reality and both of us know who controls different parts of Kashmir

Also its a futile arguement of hypocrisy that you are bringing in since even UN now considers that resolution as one past its shelf life. The same is visible in the recent statements of the sec gen of the UN and the US administration (that pretty much controls most of the stuff that goes on in the UN)
 
The colors in the map does not matter. What matters is the ground reality and both of us know who controls different parts of Kashmir

It does matter......if it did not matter why do you indians get mad when mapping companies show kashmir as disputed and not part of india.



Also its a futile arguement of hypocrisy that you are bringing in since even UN now considers that resolution as one past its shelf life. The same is visible in the recent statements of the sec gen of the UN and the US administration (that pretty much controls most of the stuff that goes on in the UN)

Sorry.......there is no "shelf life" to UN resoultions.
 
It does matter......if it did not matter why do you indians get mad when mapping companies show kashmir as disputed and not part of india.

It doesnt matter as long as you have to get Indian Visa for visiting Jammu and Kashmir...Rite.?


Sorry.......there is no "shelf life" to UN resoultions.

Thats what we too are saying.It has no shelf life now. :)
 
So india should give up its VITAL STRATEGIC hold in SOUTH ASIA and all control of the WATER,

FOR WHAT A POXY SEAT on the UN security council.

" how stupid do you think indians are "

Kashmir is as integral part of India as New Delhi or Amritsar or Banglore.

There are 300 million muslims living all over India.
 
Entire state of Kashmir is legal and integral part of India. International community has no right to put pressure on us and neither will we take it lying low. If UNSC, nuke deal, NSG rights and even king of the world title was given to us in a gold platter, we won't relinquish the state.

Those who've problems with us; can leave for any country they like we can then easily begin the resettlement of Pandit community that was nearly exterminated 22 years ago.
 

Back
Top Bottom