What's new

The Indian title laying claim to everything n an?

They have essentially chose Islam over Indian subcontinental culture. Shameless creatures looking at their own plight
It is outcome of British rule. During Indian Muslim empire rule, all of India was India. There was never this issue until British colonial rule. Islam is not in competition with anybody's nationality, ethnicity, or tribe. Don't state absurdities.
 
Sufi/salafi , and many other issue of this @IndianLite has striking @BananaRepublicUK , not @UKBengali !

He has extraordinary ability to live both in Bangladesh, UK and USA at the same time!


Where did you find this absurd idea? You may have different opinions about their religion, but who said that music is Haram in Hinduism? 😲

Even if you consider original historical vedic religion, you should know that sama Veda is actually something that are mostly Rigvedic hymns in musical form!

Haram and halal are words from another religion that mainly concern those that fellow or do their best to live by that particular religion. Not Hinduism

Food for thought , the Indian title laying claim to everything and anything. Is some what of contention of others.

In a simplest can Ponjab lay more entitled claim over a bengali - predominantly Bangladeshi culture. As he she carries the Indian title?

Or a tamil lay more greater claim over Ponjab culture or vice versa with the combos and any other combos you can think of.

As you/we/I have common root ancestors - and various other common ancestors. Also interceding languages and changing of Borders - administrators.

My point is simplest prior to post independence - Indian historical heritage should be rebranded as South Asian, as the the Indian title causes much contention, It would very irritating for someone from any part of the region just cause he holds the title of Indian badge to hold greater claim over someone else direct immediate culture.

I hope this finds everyone well, and does not cause contention, so every one can see sense.

I meant interceeded each other, different languages and changing borders
 
They have essentially chose Islam over Indian subcontinental culture.
Mount named India [Hind] in the holiest city of Islam overlooking Kaaba.
The larger Mount named QuayQaan, it's actual/original name is Mount Hindi [Indian in Arabic]. QuayQaan is a sound [clanking of swords from a battle that took place there between two tribes].
 
My point is simplest prior to post independence - Indian historical heritage should be rebranded as South Asian, as the the Indian title causes much contention, It would very irritating for someone from any part of the region just cause he holds the title of Indian badge to hold greater claim over someone else direct immediate culture.
What culture are you talking about? And you yourself have said "Indian historical heritage" :lol:. It is not up to a bunch of Pakistanis & Bangladeshis to decide what should we do with our culture and heritage. You created a land for Muslims because you claimed you are different from the rest of us.

Why not rebrand your culture as Bangladeshi culture? Or Pakistani culture, Nepali or Sri Lankan, Sri Lankans don't have a problem saying they are Sri Lankan they are proud of their Sinhala culture. Do you see Indians claiming Sinhalese culture?
 
Bhai,not majority Indian voted for BJP, but only around 31% in 2014 !It's the FPTP system make BJP in power! Later it increased anyway!

National Congress got only 19% votes. What does that tell you? I don't support Congress either. Because most of the nefarious plans to subjugate Bangladesh were formulated by the Congress. Farakka barrage, shanti bahini in CHT, territorial water dispute specially forcefully occupying South Talpatti, border killings......all that was the work of Congress.
 
What culture are you talking about? And you yourself have said "Indian historical heritage" :lol:. It is not up to a bunch of Pakistanis & Bangladeshis to decide what should we do with our culture and heritage. You created a land for Muslims because you claimed you are different from the rest of us.

Why not rebrand your culture as Bangladeshi culture? Or Pakistani culture, Nepali or Sri Lankan, Sri Lankans don't have a problem saying they are Sri Lankan they are proud of their Sinhala culture. Do you see Indians claiming Sinhalese culture?


Take a small paragraph, and ignore the rest. I used that terminology, as that is the conventional name (term) used for anything pertaining prior to post independence .
 
I was asked by a few Japanese, why Muslims do not eat pigs. Is it because pigs are sacred to Muslims?

So, how would you explain it? Probably, Hindus of India are unable to explain the cowcola thing to you. But, there was a time when Hindus were slaughtering and eating so many cows that it’s population started to dwindle causing farming to suffer.

The Aryan social leaders met and decided to stop this practice of cow eating saying that a cow is like a mother who gives milk and ploughing the farmland gives foods,

So, it had become a tradition and part of religious practice among Hindus. Only BJP made this culture difficult for the beef eating Muslims.

PIGs are haram in Islam because they are dirty and can spread fungal infection.

Carnivores are also haram - since they can also carry diseases.

E.g. mad cow disease has its roots in feeding animal byproducts to cows.
 
PIGs are haram in Islam because they are dirty and can spread fungal infection.

Carnivores are also haram - since they can also carry diseases.

E.g. mad cow disease has its roots in feeding animal byproducts to cows.
Why is turtle haram in Islam?
 
A vedic Hindu extremist would argue music is haram, well the prophet of Islam liked Music. Even the quran has a certain melody, in nature there is a certain a rhythm of sounds.

In musical pieces mathaticians founds correlations to the equations they founded in various ways.

The most important thing is how the music influences, the energy it gives positive or negative.



Not any more, alot of influences and base of west bengali culture is rooted in modern day Bangladesh. You have a very antiquated view, your not even bengali. Just a Indian badge guy.

Half of the people in West Bengal claim Bangladesh roots and heritage. Yes even Hindus.

Why is turtle haram in Islam?

Turtle are essentially reptiles which have protective shells.

 
PIGs are haram in Islam because they are dirty and can spread fungal infection.

Carnivores are also haram - since they can also carry diseases.

E.g. mad cow disease has its roots in feeding animal byproducts to cows.
II was just stating a fact about not eating pigs, dirty or clean. All animals and human bodies are dirty. Even chicken would eat human waste.

Did not the Arab people know 1500 years ago that chicken eats dirty things? How about eating fish without slaughtering them? Why do you guys violate Islamic rules?

So, it is a matter of tradition for each group of people.

But , the issue is why Muslims like you would criticize Hindus. Is it your problem if someone does not eat some food?

If you are not a Hindu, you have no right to criticize their living style, traditions and culture. It is not your headache.

People should criticize their own wrong traditions. Muslims should ask why not a single country inhabited by Muslims can develop economically instead of criticizing Hindu tradition.

How about going to the Moon in an Islamic spaceship like Hindu India has been doing?
 
II was just stating a fact about not eating pigs, dirty or clean. All animals and human bodies are dirty. Even chicken would eat human waste.

Did not the Arab people know 1500 years ago that chicken eats dirty things? How about eating fish without slaughtering them? Why do you guys violate Islamic rules?

So, it is a matter of tradition for each group of people.

But , the issue is why Muslims like you would criticize Hindus. Is it your problem if someone does not eat some food?

If you are not a Hindu, you have no right to criticize their living style, traditions and culture. It is not your headache.

People should criticize their own wrong traditions. Muslims should ask why not a single country inhabited by Muslims can develop economically instead of criticizing Hindu tradition.

How about going to the Moon in an Islamic spaceship like Hindu India has been doing?

 
Last edited:
Take a small paragraph, and ignore the rest. I used that terminology, as that is the conventional name (term) used for anything pertaining prior to post independence .
There is nothing amusing in it that warrants a response but I will indulge. Dominant culture always takes precedence, India dominates the region with geography, economy and people. West and East Pakistan issues don't exist in India, we co-exist with different linguistic groups. So, a Punjabi in India can be proud of a South Indian ISRO chief as much as a South Indian can be proud of a North Indian cricketer like say, Sachin. Indian historical heritage cannot be rebranded as South Asian simply because these cultures mostly exist in India. Outside of which are either seen with contempt, destroyed and is insignificant. Imagine someone introducing Chanakya as a Pakistani philosopher, and strategist that's just hilarious.
 

Back
Top Bottom