What's new

Turkish man: Arabs, Pakistanis, and Afghans are genetically less than humans, and we Turks are superior to them!

Status
Not open for further replies.
We and turks had a close history of cooperation.
We didn't hate each other its a lie.

You can find many persians working in turkish dynasties in islamic history. Even sultan wifes were persian and they had persian blood.their vazirs, mullahs,... were persian.

But after ataturk, turkey became a separate country from other islamic nations. And now they hate us!

The hatred is mutual, not to mention historic rivalries. Persians are also angry at Pan-Turks for claiming Iranic populations.

But Persians can be very racist or derogatory towards Turkic groups.

Azerbaijanies and Georgians and Armenians are look like iranian people.

Peopke of South caucasus are look like iranians but people of north Caucasus are look like russians.

Im sure if we made a dna test its have a similar results.

No they don't. Only reason for Iranians to look Georgians is because many have Caucuses genes. I knew a "persian" who turned out to be 90% Georgian because of DNA tests.
 
Last edited:
You mean over distribution. As mentioned in this four page essay http://www.panearth.org/WVPI/Papers/FoodPopulationSummary.pdf



Uyghurs are RACIALLY partly of Tocharian descent. This is nothing that can be denied by genetics. Modern Uyghurs are a by-product of meadival Uyghurs mixing with leftover Tocharians, hence why many modern Uyghurs have light hair & eyes.
I didn't disagree with you on the race part. My disagreement was with regard to the language. Can you kindly share some data regarding Uyghers' ethnic makeup? I can understand some Turkics carrying Tocharian blood in their veins but I will be shocked if the majority of their ethnic makeup is non-Turkic.
 
They hatred is mutual, not to mention historic rivalries. Persians are also angry at Pan-Turks for claiming Iranic populations.

But Persians can be very racist or derogatory towards Turkic groups.



No they don't. Only reason for Iranians to look Georgians is because many have Caucuses genes. I knew a "persian" who turned out to be 90% Georgian because of DNA tests.
Ultra Nationalism = racism=stupidity
 



He claims to be a specialist in the field of genetics and speaks through his knowledge of his specialty, and says that the amygdala is larger than the normal level compared to those he described as inferior and he explains it as having a primitive brain, and he adds that it is not a natural difference between two cultures, such as the Turkish and the Greek, for example, but the Arabs and Pakistanis are the lowest natural forms, There are ten million of them in our country (Turkey), and he continues to say that they lack morals, values, and morals in general, and they do not have dignity, honor, or integrity.
amygdala.jpg

Sorry to burst your bubble, but your shit still stinks like the rest of us. :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
That is insanity. No wonder the Muslims are unable to form a union. Look at all other groups and nations.
This isn't exclusive to the Islamic world. Look who fought in WWI and WW2. It was mostly Europeans fighting against Europeans.
 
This isn't exclusive to the Islamic world. Look who fought in WWI and WW2. It was mostly Europeans fighting against Europeans.

They did. Sanity prevailed eventually.
 
Having white skin doesn't make one white. You can find countless people in East Asia who are whiter than Europeans. Turkic people across Central Asia have very visible mongoloid features with Tajikistan being an exception since Tajiks are not Turkic.

Tajiks can be Mongoloid. They are mostly Caucasoid. They are Pamiri but became Persianized. But many of them are also Mongoloid.

Tajik is a linguistic group by definition of the specific label. Even the Caucasoid Tajiks are not ethnically Persian but Persianized.

And yes Uyghurs are partly of Tocharian descent. They are a blend of medieval Uyghurs mixing with leftover Tocharians whom were white and Caucasoid.

The language of the Tocharians had no known relationship to the Eastern Turkic language of medieval/modern Uyghurs.
 
I have a different opinion. The lust for power is still there but it's just the largest EU economies economically control the rest of EU countries.

The bigger economies have more clout. Nevertheless they stick together and help each other.
 
The bigger economies have more clout. Nevertheless they stick together and help each other.
The smaller EU economies are so weak that they are basically slaves of the larger ones. The smaller ones stick up for the larger ones at gunpoint not of their own accord, they have no other choice.
 
The smaller EU economies are so weak that they are basically slaves of the larger ones. The smaller ones stick up for the larger ones at gunpoint not of their own accord, they have no other choice.

They are lackeys, but also benefit from the union.
 
I didn't disagree with you on the race part. My disagreement was with regard to the language. Can you kindly share some data regarding Uyghers' ethnic makeup? I can understand some Turkics carrying Tocharian blood in their veins but I will be shocked if the majority of their ethnic makeup is non-Turkic.

I never claimed Uyghurs speak Tocharian. It's been a dead language for centuries, but the Uyghurs have Tocharian genes.

Modern Xinjiang consists of the Tarim desert which is where Tocharians lived. Ever wondered why so many Turkic peoples have ginger hair or blonde hair? It's because the region was inhabited by white folks.
 
Last edited:
I respect your opinion but I have a completely opposite opinion here. In the case of overpopulation, there are so many ways to effectively train this population to become productive thanks to modern technology; consequently, this can be a complete game changer for the country. Of course, this new population can become a huge liability if it doesn't get educated and fail to become productive for the country. Underpopulation on the other hand is way more difficult to fix than overpopulation.

Pakistan would have never been considered an Asian Tiger if it wasn't for the good economic policies of Ayub Khan. I am also aware of the fact that you despise neoliberalism and proper neoliberalism was the reason why Pakistan became an Asian Tiger. South Korea literally copied Ayub's model and made some improvements along the way and look at them now. I am no fan of neoliberalism but hardcore neoliberalism is the most perfect solution for a corrupt country like Pakistan. Adopting neoliberalism means the government will have to surrender a lot of its policies to the private sector but the government must provide an even playing field to all players. If this can happen then I promise you that Pakistan will once again become an Asian Tiger. For neoliberalism to work, the state must provide an even playing field and have very pro-business policies.
However, at the same time, I would like the government to provide affordable public transport. universal healthcare and affordable education.

South Korea could not have become what it is if it had a huge population. This fact. Their population size is limited because their northern climate restricts food production.

The Chinese are also developing because they brought their unsustainable growth under control.

However what you stated is also wrong. Fostering an enormous population by artificially circulating money is not prosperity.

One screw up and it could lead to disaster. Look at Turkey's economy and how it was nearly destroyed by COVID.

Even South Korea. Their economical model is dangerous for them. One screw up and they could suffer.

Circulating money to artificially prosper people is not the answer. Pakistan needs population reduction and fast.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom