What's new

U.S. was prepared to fight Pakistani forces, officials say

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
(CNN) -- The Obama administration had "very detailed contingency plans" for military action against Pakistani forces if they had tried to stop the U.S. attack on Osama bin Laden's compound, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the plan.

Their names are not disclosed because of the sensitive intelligence information involved.

"No firepower option was off the table" during the Navy SEALs' 38-minute mission on the ground, or during the time U.S. helicopters were in the air, one official told CNN. "We would have done whatever we had to in order to get our men out."

The two U.S. officials also told CNN about the plan if bin Laden had been captured alive, which included taking him to Afghanistan and then out to the USS Carl Vinson in the Arabian Sea.

All of the senior U.S. officials in the White House Situation Room during the assault were prepared to call their Pakistani counterparts if fighting between U.S. and Pakistani forces appeared imminent, one of the officials told CNN. The SEALs at all times retained the right of self-defense, and they could have fired at the Pakistanis to defend themselves.

During the time the SEALs were on the ground, while some were inside the compound, others were covertly placed just outside the compound walls to provide perimeter security and keep people away. Some of those SEALs would have been able to speak enough of the local language to communicate with townspeople if they had come across them, one source told CNN.

As the assault on bin Laden's compound commenced, the United States had a number of aircraft flying protective missions. None of the aircraft entered Pakistani airspace, but they were prepared to do so if needed. These included fixed wing fighter jets that would have provided firepower if the team came under opposition fire it could not handle.

Additionally, the Air Force had a full team of combat search and rescue helicopters including MH-53 Pave Low and HH-60 Pave Hawk helicopters flying.

The helicopter that came in to replace the crashed stealth helicopter was carrying a battlefield medical team that was flying overhead and ready to land if SEALs were wounded, one of the CNN sources said. That helicopter landed at the compound within about thirty minutes of being called.

U.S. military and intelligence assets were conducting continuous reconnaissance of Pakistani military installations to watch for any indication of movements, but the Pakistani military never responded while the U.S. forces were there, one U.S. official indicated.

On Monday, Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani praised the Pakistani military's response to the sudden arrival of U.S. forces. "The air force was ordered to scramble," he said. "Ground units arrived at the scene quickly. Our response demonstrates that our armed forces reacted, as was expected of them." Still, he added, "There is no denying the U.S. technological ability to evade our radars."

Even though it was anticipated that bin Laden would resist the Navy SEALs that assaulted his compound, and therefore be killed, the Obama administration had a plan in place for dealing with bin Laden if he was captured alive, according to both U.S. officials.

The plan was for bin Laden to be flown back to Afghanistan aboard U.S. military helicopters and then flown out to the USS Carl Vinson in the north Arabian Sea. There was a team of lawyers, medical personnel, interrogators and translators standing by to deal with bin Laden if that was the scenario that unfolded. A major concern was to immediately "preserve evidence" and put bin Laden into a legal framework that would ensure he could be charged and tried some day, the official said. "We didn't want to have some case thrown out on a technicality."

The official indicated the standby teams included the type of expertise normally within U.S. units in Afghanistan, so it's likely personnel did not even know who their potential target would have been. The official noted that bin Laden would have undergone the same type of medical checks and photographing that surrounded Saddam Hussein when he was captured.

After bin Laden was killed by the Navy SEALs at the compound, his body was flown back to Afghanistan, and then to the Carl Vinson where he was buried at sea. Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, placed a phone call to his counterpart General Ashfaq Kiyani asking for U.S. aircraft to re-enter Pakistani airspace -- several hours after the raid -- so the body could be flown out to the Vinson.

U.S. was prepared to fight Pakistani forces, officials say - CNN.com
 
:) yeh they said they had enough ammunition lolzz

anyway US stories are rebounding one by one so anything to keep media busy
 
What a shame! we are supporting them so much in war on terror. I don't know why they were thinking that Pakistan might try to save OBL. We hate him too, because of this rascal so many innocent people died. I don't know what book they are reading and from where they are getting their education. GEO or Jenay do bhai.
 
Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, placed a phone call to his counterpart General Ashfaq Kiyani asking for U.S. aircraft to re-enter Pakistani airspace -- several hours after the raid -- so the body could be flown out to the Vinson.
U.S. was prepared to fight Pakistani forces, officials say - CNN.com

WOW! What about that sentence! I guess permission was granted since Bin Laden's body was apparently taken to the Carl Vinson. So, even after the humiliating raid, Gen. Kiyani STILL granted the USA overflight permission!
 
Such contingencies are always part of the planning for any covert mission. The best part is that no direct confrontation occurred.
 
WOW! What about that sentence! I guess permission was granted since Bin Laden's body was apparently taken to the Carl Vinson. So, even after the humiliating raid, Gen. Kiyani STILL granted the USA overflight permission!

the permission was already granted for the staged operation anyway for face saving you can hear many such stories from your media and media of your NATO countries to cover up the funny stories your govt has spread.

---------- Post added at 08:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:50 PM ----------

Such contingencies are always part of the planning for any covert mission. The best part is that no direct confrontation occurred.

none was meant to occur
 
Rewind back to September 9, 2011 when the 19 Saudi men on a suicide mission armed with US airliners were not detectable on any US radar, physical OR electronic! Great use of 'Stealth' per say!

Feeling is mutual YANKS!
 
US was ready for firefight with Pakistan during Abottabad Raid

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama insisted American commandos raiding deep inside Pakistan on the Osama bin Laden mission have enough firepower to shoot their way out in case of a confrontation with Pakistani forces it has been revealed, even as Washington continued to get tough with Islamabad over its dodgy policy on terrorism.

Amid worsening ties with its one-time ally, the Obama administration also signaled on Monday that it was not worried about Pakistan's ability to interdict the American supply route to Afghanistan because the US was ready with alternate plans. Washington also unleashed another Drone strike inside Pakistan on Tuesday, the second since it killed bin Laden, amid continued complaints from Islamabad about violation of its sovereignty.

The White House capped the blunt, no-holds-barred American response to Islamabad's tirade by asserting that it will not apologize for its raid to nail bin Laden even as the public mood in the US turned sour on Pakistan, with demands that the Obama administration cease or suspend all aid to a country seen as fostering terrorism.

But the most surprising development is the disclosure by US officials, through two news outlets, that President Obama was willing to risk a confrontation with Pakistan by ordering an increase in force size to protect the core group of Navy Seals who went in to get bin Laden. Two dozen Navy Seals in two choppers were said to be involved in the raid on bin Laden's lair, but two addition choppers with more than 50 personnel provided perimeter cover in case of a Pakistani reaction.

"Their instructions were to avoid any confrontation if at all possible. But if they had to return fire to get out, they were authorized to do it," one US official was quoted as saying in the New York Times. A Time magazine blog had earlier quoted the President as telling operational planners, "I don't want you to plan for an option that doesn't allow you to fight your way out."

The US has gotten into occasional firefights with Pakistani troops -- many of whose officer corps are US-trained -- on the Afghan border, but Washington's directive during the raid is illustrative of how much the rift between the two sides has widened. US military personnel who have served in the theatre often speak of Pakistani perfidy in fostering militants who attack American and Nato forces in Afghanistan even as Islamabad claims to be an ally in the war on terror.

The gradual realization in Washington of this "two-faced" Pakistani policy has led to calls for suspension of aid to Islamabad from a range of US lawmakers and analysts. On Monday, Senator Diane Feinstein, who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee, broke ranks with her colleagues John Kerry and Richard Lugar, in questioning aid to Pakistan. "Either we're going to be allies in fighting terror, or the relationship makes less and less sense to me," Feinstein told reporters, adding, "...to enable him(bin Laden) to live in Pakistan in a military community for six years, I just don't believe it was done without some form of complicity."

Asked about the support Pakistan was getting from Kerry and Lugar, who are inclined to give Pakistan the benefit of doubt and whose eponymous bill funnels $ 1.5 billion annually to Islamabad, Feinstein said, "I understand that. I feel a little differently."

Kerry and Lugar are among a small group of lawmakers who are concerned with, among other things, Pakistan's ability to choke US supply route to its 140,000 troops in Afghanistan. But Obama administration officials indicated on Monday that they had factored in that possibility as they turned the heat on Pakistan to change course.

"We're confident that we're not dependent upon any particular single thread, and we can continue to supply the Afghanistan effort," US undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics Ashton Carter told a wire service.

The Obama administration's tough posture towards Pakistan, a shifty ally that was mollycoddled by previous administrations despite its fostering of terrorism, has sent the country rushing to seek solace from China, its "all-weather friend." After a defiant speech in Parliament on Monday in which lavished praise on Beijing while twitting Washington, Pakistan's Prime Minister Yousef Raza Gilani scheduled a four-day visit to China starting May 17.

Some US analysts were not impressed. Tom Ricks, a foreign policy expert who writes the "Best Defense" blog, suggested that Washington needs to have "a short-term plan that temporarily keeps us close to Pakistan, followed by a much different long-run strategy that cuts us loose from this wreck of a state."

"If Pakistan wants to retaliate by allying with China -- knock yourselves out, fellas," he sneered.

Islamabad's message to the Obama administration that it was willing to provide access to bin Laden three widows did little to assuage anger in Washington over what is widely seen here as Pakistan's perfidy.
 
Rewind back to September 9, 2011 when the 19 Saudi men on a suicide mission armed with US airliners were not detectable on any US radar, physical OR electronic! Great use of 'Stealth' per say!

Feeling is mutual YANKS!


If you are trying to post a smart remark in trying to save face, at least get the date correct.
 
Such contingencies are always part of the planning for any covert mission. The best part is that no direct confrontation occurred.

All possibilities of direct confrontation were tactically (and tactfully) avoided. That is the reason for the "inactive" business. Also the 2 Falcons scrambled from Sargodha were orbiting around the eastern border, so nobody got in the way of the other.
 
Very dumb on the Americans part who would have resisted ????not this army oh no no why were they so worried? easiest opration in the world if you ask me knowing the courage of our great generals
 
WTF? whoever from PAF that turned off those radar saved ww3!!!:eek:
 
No ww3 just bullshit propaganda to hide their incompetence and lack of courage to engage the enemy !!!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom