What's new

IAF R-73/R-77 AAMs recovered from Mig-21 wreckage l Abhinandan did not fire any missile

Using Spice is not equivalent to IAF intruding 80km.
Do not twist facts.
IAF only got to a vantage point in order to release the SPICE ammo and then speed back.
They failed to do it right.

PAF buzzed your brigade HQ , only to be chased by IAF.
There were more planes than Mig21; and they returned back from LOC as per orders ( on both sides apparently )
Abhinandan didn't turn, and got shot at.

I think you can use use NASR and even hit anything in India. True.
I never underestimated the possibility.

India Hits Pakistan. Okey.
Pakistan Hits India.. Fine.

My only concern why was PAF Sleeping when India Attacked. Why Not a Single Abhinandan from PAF did his Duty ?
 
I wish you had pilots who were simply : AWAKE !
Whoa kid easy !
Let us sleep while you go 800 Km deep inside Pakistan...
And keep the migs coming, our pilots are bored as heck...
 
Whoa kid easy !
Let us sleep while you go 800 Km deep inside Pakistan...
And keep the migs coming, our pilots are bored as heck...

lol

This was the EXACT thing which made 1971 possible. lol
 
@XiNiX

acha sun...dard to nahi hora...I mean, yanay, ZIADA dard to nahi ho raha meri radha jani ko! ;)
 
r73.jpg
 
Beta, Stop trolling and be a Man.
Try some Facts rather Offtopic Troll to save fave and derail your own thread.
bay yar india got buttraped dry and now your getting buttraped dry while in complete denial of everything! trolling to banti hay! 8-)
 
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paki...-fire-any-missile.607189/page-9#post-11287514

Aim-120 could have been fired by F-16 but that does not mean F-16 was shot down you dumb!
meanwhile Indian theory of abi-naan-man shooting down f-16 has been busted!!!!! hahahahaha

Exactly. My Friend.
I never Claimed Abhinandan Killed an f16.

The Point is :

1. ISPR Lied about F16s being used
2. ISPR Lied about Number of Pilots 3... to 1

Can we Trust such Agencies who Lie ?

Now, India Claims We shot an F16. I do not agrre/disagrre to this.
AIM 120 proof is not complete for this claim.
 

Back
Top Bottom