What's new

How Bias in Text books fuels division in Pakistani society

I am afraid that a system that has clearly failed to produce any tangible deliverables apart from rabid and convenient nationalism, fanaticism and wilful ignorance has very poor grounds for claiming propriety rights over future generations. What you are clearly saying is that they are ours to throw into the gutter of ignorance and resultant destitution, just as was done to the Pakistanis of this generation by the powers-that-be.



What is the intended result, in your opinion?

There may be rather there are many things wrong with education system of Pakistan but text books are not one of them. What people are suggesting amounts to the claim like "since there often happens to be shootings in American schools, American textbooks must be teaching use of violence against innocent students!". Pakistan's textbooks are fairly good and teach what should be taught. Certainly they can be improved. How some youth end up as religious extremists has other factors involved.

Pakistan has a predominantly Muslim identity and we will not be apologetic for that. Struggle for Pakistan was essentially to save that identity and will be mentioned as it was to our next generation.

I do not agree completely with your assertion that our education system has only produced ineffective people. Pakistanis have gone on to win Nobles to working at CERN, NASA and some of the most prestigious places on earth. Sure we could do better. But being apologetic for who and what we are is not going to make that happen.
 
No idea where you got it from...Interesting enough the link for the "original report" doesnt work it came back as "NOT FOUND"

However the link from the post suggests this: Just another WordPress.com weblog
Don't believe it? Here...


Still in denial? It's high time you guys wake up and smell the coffee before an entire generation is radicalized beyond redemption.
 
Jacob avoid personal attacks...It is against rule of this forum

Wow, are you around to police the 101 personal attacks and filthy abuses that I receive on a daily basis on this forum?
 
There may be rather there are many things wrong with education system of Pakistan but text books are not one of them. What people are suggesting amounts to the claim like "since there often happens to be shootings in American schools, American textbooks must be teaching use of violence against innocent students!". Pakistan's textbooks are fairly good and teach what should be taught. Certainly they can be improved. How some youth end up as religious extremists has other factors involved.

Pakistan has a predominantly Muslim identity and we will not be apologetic for that. Struggle for Pakistan was essentially to save that identity and will be mentioned as it was to our next generation.

I do not agree completely with your assertion that our education system has only produced ineffective people. Pakistanis have gone on to win Nobles to working at CERN, NASA and some of the most prestigious places on earth. Sure we could do better. But being apologetic for who and what we are is not going to make that happen.

World Bank Data

Patent applications filed by Pakistanis in 2013: 151

India 10,669

Scientific and technical journal articles published in 2011 – Pakistan 1,268

India – 22,481

High technology exports: $0.349 billion

India - $16.693 billion

Books published in 2012 : 3,811

India (2013): 90,000

Fortunately or unfortunately, the process to evaluate changes in the curriculum is a little bit more involved than just a newspaper article, Sir:

Curriculum development process in pakistan (by umair ashraf)

http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_1_No_14_October_2011/34.pdf

According to Baela Raza Jamil, General Zia's 1979 education policy stated that "[the] highest priority would be given to the revision of the curricula with a view to reorganizing the entire content around Islamic thought and giving education an ideological orientation so that Islamic ideology permeates the thinking of the younger generation and helps them with the necessary conviction and ability to refashion society according to Islamic tenets".

"Curriculum Reforms in Pakistan – A Glass Half Full or Half Empty?"

Writing for the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, A H Nayyar and Ahmed Salim state that since the 1970s Pakistani school textbooks have systematically inculcated hatred towards India and Hindus through historical revisionism. There is no mention of Islamic invasion and conversion of Hindus. Many texts give an impression that ancient Indian heritage was not destroyed by Afghans and Turks but Muslim heritage was destroyed by Indians, which contradicts the theory of mainstream historians.

The subtle Subversion: A report on Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan

In a 1995 paper published in the International Journal of Middle East Studies, historian Ayesha Jalal stated that "Pakistan's history textbooks amongst the best available sources for assessing the nexus between power and bigotry in creative imaginings of a national past." She points out authors whose "expansive pan-Islamic imaginings" detect the beginnings of Pakistan in the birth of Islam on the Arabian peninsula. A Text Book of Pakistan Studies claims that Pakistan "came to be established for the first time when the Arabs under Mohammad bin Qasim occupied Sindh and Multan'; by the thirteenth century 'Pakistan had spread to include the whole of Northern India and Bengal' and then under the Khiljis, Pakistan moved further south-ward to include a greater part of Central India and the Deccan'. [...] The spirit of Pakistan asserted itself', and under Aurangzeb the 'Pakistan spirit gathered in strength'; his death 'weakened the Pakistan spirit'." Jalal points out that even an acclaimed scholar like Jameel Jalibi questions the validity of a national history that seeks to "claim Pakistan's pre-Islamic past" in an attempt to compete with India's historic antiquity. K. Ali's two volume history designed for BA students traces the pre-history of the 'Indo-Pakistan' subcontinent to the Paleolithic Age and consistently refers to the post-1947 frontiers of Pakistan while discussing the Dravidians and the Aryans.

"Conjuring Pakistan: History as Official Imagining" (PDF). International Journal of Middle East Studies

Indophobia, together with Anti-Hinduism and racist ideologies, such as the Martial Race theory, were the driving factors behind the re-writing of school textbooks in Pakistan (in both "secular" schools and Islamic madrassahs) in order to promote a biased and revisionist historiography of the Indian subcontinent that promulgated Indophobic and anti-Hindu prejudices. These narratives are combined with Islamist propaganda in the extensive revising of Pakistan's history. By propagating concepts such as jihad, the inferiority of non-Muslims, India’s perceived ingrained enmity with Pakistan, etc., the textbook board publications used by all government schools promote an obscurantist mindset.

Curriculum of hatred, Dawn, 2009-05-20

According to the historian Professor Mubarak Ali, textbook "reform" in Pakistan began with the introduction of Pakistan Studies and Islamic studies by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in 1971 into the national curriculum as a compulsory subject. Former military dictator Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, under a general drive towards Islamization, started the process of historical revisionism in earnest and exploited this initiative. 'The Pakistani establishment taught their children right from the beginning that this state was built on the basis of religion – that's why they don't have tolerance for other religions and want to wipe-out all of them.'

The threat of Pakistan's revisionist texts The Guardian, 2009-05-18

According to Pakistani physicist, Pervez Hoodbhoy, the Islamist revisionism of Pakistan's schools began in 1976 when an act of parliament required all government and private schools (except those teaching the British O-levels from Grade 9) to follow a curriculum that includes learning outcomes for the federally approved Grade 5 social studies class such as: 'Acknowledge and identify forces that may be working against Pakistan,' 'Make speeches on Jihad,' 'Collect pictures of policemen, soldiers, and national guards,' and 'India's evil designs against Pakistan.'

Pakistan: Do school texts fuel bias?, Christian Science Monitor, 2009-01-21

Likewise, Yvette Rosser criticizes Pakistani textbooks for propagating jingoist and irredentist beliefs about Pakistan's history and culture, and being negationist in its depiction of political Islam and the treatment of minorities in Pakistan, such as Hindus and Christians. Irredentism is manifested through claims of "eternal Pakistan" (despite the country being created from British India only in 1947), narrow and sectarian interpretation of Islam, downplaying the tolerant aspects of the religion and focusing on Islamic Fundamentalist interpretations (such as all banking being un-Islamic), and making accusations of dual loyalty on minority Hindus and Christians in Pakistan.

Rosser, Yvette (June 2005). "Cognitive Dissonance in Pakistan Studies Textbooks: Educational Practices of an Islamic State.". Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law 1 (2): 4–15.
 
According to Baela Raza Jamil, General Zia's 1979 education policy stated that "[the] highest priority would be given to the revision of the curricula with a view to reorganizing the entire content around Islamic thought and giving education an ideological orientation so that Islamic ideology permeates the thinking of the younger generation and helps them with the necessary conviction and ability to refashion society according to Islamic tenets".

"Curriculum Reforms in Pakistan – A Glass Half Full or Half Empty?"

Writing for the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, A H Nayyar and Ahmed Salim state that since the 1970s Pakistani school textbooks have systematically inculcated hatred towards India and Hindus through historical revisionism. There is no mention of Islamic invasion and conversion of Hindus. Many texts give an impression that ancient Indian heritage was not destroyed by Afghans and Turks but Muslim heritage was destroyed by Indians, which contradicts the theory of mainstream historians.

The subtle Subversion: A report on Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan

In a 1995 paper published in the International Journal of Middle East Studies, historian Ayesha Jalal stated that "Pakistan's history textbooks amongst the best available sources for assessing the nexus between power and bigotry in creative imaginings of a national past." She points out authors whose "expansive pan-Islamic imaginings" detect the beginnings of Pakistan in the birth of Islam on the Arabian peninsula. A Text Book of Pakistan Studies claims that Pakistan "came to be established for the first time when the Arabs under Mohammad bin Qasim occupied Sindh and Multan'; by the thirteenth century 'Pakistan had spread to include the whole of Northern India and Bengal' and then under the Khiljis, Pakistan moved further south-ward to include a greater part of Central India and the Deccan'. [...] The spirit of Pakistan asserted itself', and under Aurangzeb the 'Pakistan spirit gathered in strength'; his death 'weakened the Pakistan spirit'." Jalal points out that even an acclaimed scholar like Jameel Jalibi questions the validity of a national history that seeks to "claim Pakistan's pre-Islamic past" in an attempt to compete with India's historic antiquity. K. Ali's two volume history designed for BA students traces the pre-history of the 'Indo-Pakistan' subcontinent to the Paleolithic Age and consistently refers to the post-1947 frontiers of Pakistan while discussing the Dravidians and the Aryans.

"Conjuring Pakistan: History as Official Imagining" (PDF). International Journal of Middle East Studies

Indophobia, together with Anti-Hinduism and racist ideologies, such as the Martial Race theory, were the driving factors behind the re-writing of school textbooks in Pakistan (in both "secular" schools and Islamic madrassahs) in order to promote a biased and revisionist historiography of the Indian subcontinent that promulgated Indophobic and anti-Hindu prejudices. These narratives are combined with Islamist propaganda in the extensive revising of Pakistan's history. By propagating concepts such as jihad, the inferiority of non-Muslims, India’s perceived ingrained enmity with Pakistan, etc., the textbook board publications used by all government schools promote an obscurantist mindset.

Curriculum of hatred, Dawn, 2009-05-20

According to the historian Professor Mubarak Ali, textbook "reform" in Pakistan began with the introduction of Pakistan Studies and Islamic studies by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in 1971 into the national curriculum as a compulsory subject. Former military dictator Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, under a general drive towards Islamization, started the process of historical revisionism in earnest and exploited this initiative. 'The Pakistani establishment taught their children right from the beginning that this state was built on the basis of religion – that's why they don't have tolerance for other religions and want to wipe-out all of them.'

The threat of Pakistan's revisionist texts The Guardian, 2009-05-18

According to Pakistani physicist, Pervez Hoodbhoy, the Islamist revisionism of Pakistan's schools began in 1976 when an act of parliament required all government and private schools (except those teaching the British O-levels from Grade 9) to follow a curriculum that includes learning outcomes for the federally approved Grade 5 social studies class such as: 'Acknowledge and identify forces that may be working against Pakistan,' 'Make speeches on Jihad,' 'Collect pictures of policemen, soldiers, and national guards,' and 'India's evil designs against Pakistan.'

Pakistan: Do school texts fuel bias?, Christian Science Monitor, 2009-01-21

Likewise, Yvette Rosser criticizes Pakistani textbooks for propagating jingoist and irredentist beliefs about Pakistan's history and culture, and being negationist in its depiction of political Islam and the treatment of minorities in Pakistan, such as Hindus and Christians. Irredentism is manifested through claims of "eternal Pakistan" (despite the country being created from British India only in 1947), narrow and sectarian interpretation of Islam, downplaying the tolerant aspects of the religion and focusing on Islamic Fundamentalist interpretations (such as all banking being un-Islamic), and making accusations of dual loyalty on minority Hindus and Christians in Pakistan.

Rosser, Yvette (June 2005). "Cognitive Dissonance in Pakistan Studies Textbooks: Educational Practices of an Islamic State.". Journal of Islamic State Practices in International Law 1 (2): 4–15.


All of that is just one side. The process also has input from the other side which supports the present curricula, Sir.
 
Time to move ahead instead of indulging in useless debates. No Pakistani child remembers what he had been taught in primary in Islamiat or Urdu subjects.

If you think that those textbooks spread hate then get your head checked and kindly take a look at the mindset of O and A level students who look at any "paindu" or poor man with hate and disgust.
 
All of that is just one side. The process also has input from the other side which supports the present curricula, Sir.

What input is given by the side that argues that lies teaching hatred and bigotry should be taught to students?

According to Pakistani professor Tariq Rahman, Pakistani textbooks cannot mention Hindus without calling them cunning, scheming, deceptive or something equally insulting. The textbooks ignore the pre-Islamic history of Pakistan except to put the Hindu predecessors in negative light.

Cohen, Stephen. The idea of Pakistan

Another Pakistani historian Khursheed Kamal Aziz similarly has criticized Pakistani history textbooks. He stated that textbooks were full of historical errors and suggested that mandatory study amounted to teaching "prescribed myths". After examining 66 textbooks used at various levels of study Aziz argued that the textbooks supported military rule in Pakistan, promoted hatred for Hindus, glorified wars and distorted the pre 1947 history of Pakistan.

Haqqani, Hussain. "Pakistan:between mosque and the military". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

A study by Iftikhar Ahmad of Long Island University in 2004 drew five conclusions from content analysis of the social studies textbooks in Pakistan:

  1. First, the selection of material and their thematic sequence in the textbooks present Islam not simply as a belief system but a political ideology and a grand unifying worldview that must be accepted by all citizens.
  2. Second, to sanctify Islamic ideology as an article of faith, the textbooks distort historical facts about the nation's cultural and political heritage.
  3. Third, the textbooks offer a biased treatment of non-Muslim citizens in Pakistan.
  4. Fourth, the main objective of the social studies textbooks on Pakistan studies, civics, and global studies, is to indoctrinate children for a romanticized Islamic state as conceptualized by Islamic theocrats.
  5. Fifth, although the vocabulary in the textbooks underscores Islamic virtues, such as piety, obedience, and submission, little is mentioned about critical thinking, civic participation, or democratic values of freedom of speech, equality, and respect for cultural diversity.
Ahmad, Iftikhar. Current Issues in Comparative Education "Islam, Democracy and Citizenship Education: An Examination of the Social Studies Curriculum in Pakistan"

In the above-mentioned study by Nayyar & Salim of the Sustainable Development Policy Institute concluded that there is an increasing trend where children are taught Pakistan Studies as a replacement for the teaching of history and geography as full fledged disciplines. Previously, children were taught the very early pre-Islamic history of South Asia and its contribution to rich cultural diversity of modern-day Pakistan. This long historical perspective of Pakistan is absent these Pakistan Studies textbooks. Instead, children are now taught that the history of Pakistan starts from the day the first Muslim set foot in India. The study reported that the textbooks also had a lot of gender-biased stereotypes and other perspectives that "encourage prejudice, bigotry and discrimination towards fellow Pakistanis and other nations, especially against religious minorities, as well as the omission of concepts ... that could encourage critical self awareness among students”.

The subtle Subversion: A report on Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan

Rubina Saigol, a US educated expert, said "I have been arguing for the longest time that, in fact, our state system is the biggest Madrassah, we keep blaming madrassahs for everything and, of course, they are doing a lot of things I would disagree with. But the state ideologies of hate and a violent, negative nationalism are getting out there where madrassahs cannot hope to reach."

Watson, Paul (18 August 2005). "In Pakistan's Public Schools, Jihad Still Part of Lesson Plan"

According to Raza Rumi: “Pakistani textbooks have preached falsehoods, hatred and bigotry. They have constructed most non-Muslims, especially Hindus, as evil and primordial enemies, glorified military dictatorships and omitted references to our great betrayal of the Bengali brothers and sisters who were the founders and owners of the Pakistan movement. It is time to correct these wrongs.”

Rumi, Raza (14 April 2011). "Our textbooks and the lies they teach". The Express Tribune

Time to move ahead instead of indulging in useless debates. No Pakistani child remembers what he had been taught in primary in Islamiat or Urdu subjects.

If you think that those textbooks spread hate then get your head checked and kindly take a look at the mindset of O and A level students who look at any "paindu" or poor man with hate and disgust.

I think people who simply troll a thread and randomly mention unconnected drivel are the ones who should "get their heads checked".

Distorting history is ignoring the killing of American Indians and attributing their death to some disease...But we hear silence about it....not even the average indian dares to voice it out but put Pakistan on and every tom dick and harry is ready to bash

You DO know that American Indians are not from India, right?
 
Don't believe it? Here...


Still in denial? It's high time you guys wake up and smell the coffee before an entire generation is radicalized beyond redemption.
Kindly do tell me who each of these people who are claiming such things are and what is their role in investigating what they are presenting? Good laugh! Not only did they present the year wrong, the rule wrong, even what the ministry of education did wrongly :rofl:

Sure I know what is wrong in my country....I have many threads on it...Kindly go wory about your own country! I dont think I need to reply to an indian on a forum about what was wrong with that video...No idea whats the obsession of indians ... :tsk:

You DO know that American Indians are not from India, right?
And typical indian mindset thinking everyone wants to talk about them :tsk:

In the secular wear students in public schools are not forced to study any religion. Christianity is not taught to anyone in schools in Canada or the US. School is a place to learn and gain knowledge not to be fed propaganda and religious extremism.
Just coz you didnt go through it doesnt mean you can speak for each school...
2ndly I dont know why when one speaks of EDUCATION SYSTEM they remove the private schools when if you look up the definition of any education system both public and private are included!

And kindly do not deny that SOME curriculum do include WORLD RELIGIONS and that in itself is teaching religion....I never said they thought 1 religion...Just religion even in world history...

And west does include Europe

And in ethics class....we get examples from the bible every so often without it being refereed to the bible....But one who has read the bible can see where the example came from....

Everyone needs to have some source for their examples....But of course we dont label it teaching Christianity we label it ETHICS....

The article is talking about public and private schools not your run of the mill
Then why is everyone denying private school examples? Claiming what private schools do is in their own domain when I am also talking about private schools and have mentioned it specifically coz I didnt go to a Public school to talk about it!

Madrasahs so don't compare what they teach in convent schools to public schools. Public and private schools in the west do not make it compulsory to learn about any religion. Obviously if you are in a catholic school, you will be taught about Christianity. That is like being taught about Islam in madrassas.

Contradicting yourself where you say the article IS ABOUT BOTH systems but dont talk about 1 talk about the one people wish to bash :unsure:

I didnt use the word compulsory I said they do teach...Why so defensive?

And yet Catholic schools DO MAKE UP part of the Private schools as well as PART OF THE EDUCATION SYSTEM which is being discussed!

You are not only delusional but also extremely ignorant.
That is rich esp coming from 1 who is not only cherry picking my points out of context but also contradicting himself all over :o:

he reality is Pakistani education is shit and filled with hatred and propaganda. It is no wonder why Pakistanis are so delusional and misinformed like yourself.
I never studied in Pakistan...So interesting for you to say such BS out of sheer hatred and ignorance! :tup:

I know the curriculum coz more than half of my family is in education...

Pakistani curriculum speed garbage about hatred against other religions or how Muslims ruled India for a thousand years (lmao). When fairy tales like a man surviving inside a whale for a number of days or a man being able to talk to God or animals are presented as facts, it is no wonder why Pakistanis lack critical thinking skills. Less religion and more science would go a long way.
Was being insensitive also thought in Canada or is that your specialty?

Mind you it is also taught as fact in Christian schools so why bash 1 and spare the other?

What is also thought is this line which fits you best: to you your own belief and to me my own!

. Less religion and more science would go a long way.
It took west a long time to grasp that (if I recall the 2 crusades lasted more than 100 yrs) would take time for East to adapt to your whims!

All of this stuff can be taught in madrassas.
And with people like you presenting shit about Madrassah we already see how people feel about it....
There is no reason for it to be taught in private or public schools.
And yet you said I am delusional when I pointed out private schools :tsk: Make up your mind ...oh wait you are uninformed or just too emotional to see you bashing randomly :undecided:

. Non Muslims and even Muslims should not be forced to learn about Islam. It is not the duty of teachers to teach their students about religion. Religion has no place in the education system.
Your opinion...Why force it down on some people when you wish not people force their opinion down your throat? Why do something you hate and criticize others of doing?

What rubbish. I posted an article from Dawn. You should seriously consider visiting a psychiatrist.
click on the report and paste it here...coz the page did not show!

That article is from Dawn. A newspaper. Do you know what that is?
I am not talking about the article any one can write that...I am talking about the report which the article claims is writing from!

according to a study by a US government commission
:rofl: Enough said there!

Jacob avoid personal attacks...It is against rule of this forum
Its not his first ....But of course nothing much can be expected from one who loves to impose his thoughts on a nation that has nothing to do with him....and who also wishes to see Pakistan through the eyes presented to him rather than ground reality :tsk:

The 2011 Pew Research Center study found the country is the third most intolerant in the world, but because of the influence they have, they are especially worrisome.
I wonder how that is so:

Pakistan one of the least racist countries in the world: Survey - The Express Tribune

Why read and get excited about 1 side of the story by 1 opinion?

But of course you live in 2011 I guess...based on a report which doesnt exist online :undecided:

Unlike you I can post the source of Express tribune's article: A fascinating map of the world’s most and least racially tolerant countries - The Washington Post
 
What input is given by the side that argues that lies teaching hatred and bigotry should be taught to students?

Sir, what you call hatred and bigotry may appear to be awareness of a cunning enemy and religious beliefs to others. Formation and revision of a national curriculum must take into account all sorts of viewpoints, given the goals and given the mechanisms available for the local population.
 
And typical indian mindset thinking everyone wants to talk about them :tsk:

So basically you do not know that American Indians are not from India. There should be a qualification test for eligibility to post on PDF, so that we could be rid of your mindless posts.
 
So basically you do not know that American Indians are not from India.
and again :tsk:

RIP!

There should be a qualification test for eligibility to post on PDF, so that we could be rid of your mindless posts.
Yes and comprehension as well as ability to hold a proper debate should also be tested!


Myabe we also need to get rid of people who love to boast and troll on threads about countries they have no clue, about issues they have no knowledge on, about idiots who cant tolerate anything different to their bigoted thinking while calling anything remotely different from them as stupid!


And of course we need to get rid of all those trolls who think they can get away with sarcasm when thrown the same at them are clueless....as well as people who need everything to be broken to them so they can understand and also people who keep jumping to conclusions or are narrow minded....What about those who refuse to use their braincells and prefer to be spoon fed all the way or else they will jump to conclusions based on their narrow mindedness as well as narrow experience with limited people/ culture to be able to digest a difference?
 
A few points
1) Most of the textbooks filled with 'bias' in any society do not have such a deep impact as to cause division in that society, mainly because of the ineptitude of the teacher or disinterest of the students. This is particularly true for countries like India and Pakistan.
2) The division in society is more likely to be caused by wrong beliefs put in the minds by personal beliefs of parents, elders, or teachers whom the kids view as role models.
If changes are made in point number 1, well and good....but the main issue is the second point (the child's environmental situations)
 
Well done! A sane human being!
1) Most of the textbooks filled with 'bias' in any society do not have such a deep impact as to cause division in that society, mainly because of the ineptitude of the teacher or disinterest of the students. This is particularly true for countries like India and Pakistan.
Agreed

2) The division in society is more likely to be caused by wrong beliefs put in the minds by personal beliefs of parents, elders, or teachers whom the kids view as role models.
Probably true

When you are surrounded by anger and hatred it is less thought at school more at home...

If changes are made in point number 1, well and good....but the main issue is the second point (the child's environmental situations)
Any opinions on how to change that no.2?
 
I wonder how that is so:

Why read and get excited about 1 side of the story by 1 opinion?

But of course you live in 2011 I guess...based on a report which doesnt exist online :undecided:

The mention of the Pew Research Poll was not by me, but the article that was quoted in my post. Maybe schools that tech how to spew drivel might as well have taught how to read....

In any case, here is the 2014 Pew Research on Religious intolerance. It also contains previous years' rankings, with Pakistan right at the top of religious intolerance charts:

And beyond this, do not play your insidious and venal games with me. I will not react to your incessant baiting. I fully well know your strategy. I have seen you do this on PDF countless times. You will goad someone into flooding the thread with citations and instances and then run to the mods and have them banned. You are a schemer. Do not try to be too smart.

Key findings about growing religious hostilities around the world | Pew Research Center
 
Any opinions on how to change that no.2?
If anyone comes up with a solution to point no.2 and implements it; that would be the end of all wars, conflicts, and major acts of violence. If not in the whole world, at least in that particular society.
A solution could be probably be found by studying countries like Denmark and Iceland, and why they are so safe to live in.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom