F-16 uses humans as pilots, which limits maneuverability due to reaction time as well has biological limitations such as g-force caps, which must be taken into account. Hence, missiles are capable of much tighter turns.
Attentive but dismissive, we know well and clear what the T-50 is capable of, and to be frank, there's nothing to be concerned of seeing the development and pace it is at today.
No, get your reading and your mindset straight before you respond. If you consider taking the "flying wing" design all copies of that Nazi contraption, then surely by Indian logic all fixed wing designs are mere copies of one another. Hence by that standard, F-14=Su27 and Mig-21=F-86, am I not...
Let me get this straight, just because Northrop used the flying wing configuration made the B2 a mere copy? In that case, the MKI is a copy of the F-14 and the Tejas a copy of the J-10. No, your logic is flawed. When the basic shape is adopted for the basis of development, it cannot be called a...
Seeing by the attitude of many people on the forums and the things in Indian media which people post, it is clear India is taking offense at other nations' military buildups and is acting aggressively "thinking" that it will be attacked. In short, its pessimism and cynicalism prevents the...
This shows how much knowledge you have in this area. If you want to refute my claim, give me reason. Not haha hehe huuhuu's and lol's rofl rofl bounce bounce bounce.
Hahahahaaa, you're so funny, so a crazy Indian behind 2 UN flags got to you huh? Anyone can manipulate my past posts and add...
You have successfully avoided answering my question completely. I asked, why is there a need for India to arm itself to the extent it has when there are hardly any threats from formidable foes. You, my friend, have turned my questions into warmonger statements.