What's new

Arabs angry for Iran-P5+1 talks, 'The Security Council for Fatwas'

Status
Not open for further replies.
For God's sake, how many times do I have tell Pakistanis to NOT GET INVOLVED in the Arab-Iranian conflict! All you do is make your own position worse - which is not what we want! Why argue for the sake of either one side if there's nothing productive to say?
 
For God's sake, how many times do I have tell Pakistanis to NOT GET INVOLVED in the Arab-Iranian conflict! All you do is make your own position worse - which is not what we want! Why argue for the sake of either one side if there's nothing productive to say?

People are not supposed to take sides only about their own matters,otherwise they don't have any difference with a potato.
 
The Security Council for Fatwas

This is not a joke or an example of sarcasm; rather this is to commiserate with the recent statement issued by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that there are signals from Tehran that the Iranians are prepared to bring positive ideas to the table regarding their nuclear program, pointing to an Iranian fatwa prohibiting the country from possessing nuclear weapons. Therefore, so long as Iran is taking fatwas into account with regards to its policies, perhaps it would be better if we established a Security Council for fatwas!

Over the past 3 decades, since the Khomeinist revolution, Iran has been prepared to utilize religion, sectarianism and even the Palestinian Cause, as playing cards in order to infiltrate our region, as well as to divide Arab states from within; Tehran is doing this today in Iraq and Yemen, whilst it previously did this in Lebanon via Hezbollah, and this is not to mention the role it played in dividing the Palestinians. Therefore if Tehran is prepared to do all this in the name of religion and sectarianism, how can we trust the statements made by the Iranian Supreme Guide that there is a fatwa against nuclear arms? If they want to convince us that religion should serve as a source of trust in Iran, why has Tehran created strife, conflict and division in “friendly and sisterly” Islamic states? If religion truly were the guarantor of Iran’s behavior, why did Tehran sponsor the terrorist Imad Mughniyah? Why did Iran sponsor and engage with the terrorist Al Qaeda organization? Tehran has sponsored and engaged with Sunni and Shiite terrorists alike, over the past decades, and these are the same terrorists whose hands are stained with the blood of the innocent, via terrorist suicide operations, and others; so after all this, how can we trust Tehran, simply on the basis of a religious fatwa? How can we invoke a fatwa issued from a regime that does not hesitate to deal with terrorists, whether Sunni or Shiite? This is truly absurd!

The problem with the Obama administration is that it wants to pursue policies that may be acceptable to the day-dreaming cultural elite, but not to regimes that are full of cunning and deceit, like the Iranian regime, whose primary objectives do not include development, openness, humanitarian values, the well-being of its citizens, or even religious tolerance; rather all that the Iranian regime – and the ideology behind it – cares about is expansion and infiltrating other countries, for sectarian motives. Since the world is ruled by international laws and conventions, as well as interests, it is absurd to talk about an Iranian fatwa when negotiating with Tehran, for countries – like individuals – have reputations and histories that cannot be ignored, therefore the reputation of a bad country, like the reputation of a bad individual, is not based on statements or fatwas, but rather past deeds! Therefore, when US Secretary of State Clinton talks about the Iranian fatwa, we can be certain that she has not heard about Iranian taqqiya [the practice of precautionary dissimulation emphasized in Shiite Islam whereby adherents may conceal their religion when under threat]! Tehran has a history of failing to comply by its pledges and agreements, and the best example here is the visit paid by the Iranian President [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad] to the Emirati Abu Musa Island that is under occupation by Iran, for despite all the Iranian – Emirati agreements regarding a truce to precede negotiations and dialogue, Tehran failed to respect its pledge; therefore if the president of the country fails to abide by his word, how can we believe the country itself will abide by this fatwa?

In reality, the claim that we can rely on a fatwa that prohibits the possession of nuclear weapons, reminds us of the famous Arab proverb: “the thief was asked to swear [his innocence], and he swore [falsely] and said “yes, this is the way out [of the predicament]!” If this fatwa is one of the merits of dialogue with Iran, then by God we are truly facing a disaster in the region!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The more i read these articles,the more i believe they are Iran's worst enemies.Just look how angry the author is that he is writing such a bs.
I can't remember the last time I read an article and agreed with every single word!!!
 
No, wonder, Al Saud and gulf regimes spread hate chaos in the region!!!???? what you think for whom sake all that i still don't know may be the one who knows share some points many thanks.
This is between us and Iranians. Please keep your focus on liberating your country from the Iranian occupation, and maybe ask them politely to stop stealing your oil.
Thanks
 
This is between us and Iranians. Please keep your focus on liberating your country from the Iranian occupation, and maybe ask them politely to stop stealing your oil.
Thanks

Sorry mate I thought America owned your oil and you just got commission a few dollars a barrel something like that for one rich family
 
This is between us and Iranians. Please keep your focus on liberating your country from the Iranian occupation, and maybe ask them politely to stop stealing your oil.
Thanks

:laugh::rofl:
Are you high or something?

First take care about your country stolen by Americans and some puppet fat princes,then talk about Iraq.
Iraq again is going to be powerful,but this time in a good way.I know you guys hate seeing it.
 
:laugh::rofl:
Are you high or something?

First take care about your country stolen by Americans and some puppet fat princes,then talk about Iraq.
Iraq again is going to be powerful,but this time in a good way.I know you guys hate seeing it.
They are going to very powerful indeed, especially while you continue to steal their natural resources.
 
Iran doesn't even consider Iraq a sovereign state.

Iran-rejects-Iraq-1.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-3.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-4.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-7.jpg

...............................................................................................................


Iran-rejects-Iraq-9.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-10.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-11.jpg


Where's the Iraqi flag I wonder ?
They probably just forgot:whistle:
 
Sorry mate I thought America owned your oil and you just got commission a few dollars a barrel something like that for one rich family

But, this rich family let you and your likes leave Pakistan, I hope no one of you will stay in Pakistan in the few coming years. ;)
I think our Pakistani brothers have made it clear about who u are... Shall I qout their replies here. ;)
 
BP we are in the same boat as you but I must say I made a private initiative and I private messaged a pro Saudi member this morning and said we should encourage dialogue and peace between Arabs and Iranians. I was so shocked at his response he said and even now I feel sick he said I not only will not assist you but want to burn all Iranians. i feel very sad to see one Muslim say this about another
The most sectarian group of Muslims are two Selefi and Wahhabi, most of the hate and killing we see in our Islamic world come from these hatred ignorants without a real stand of most of the Muslims against these sick cannibal!!!??? otherwise we will see more and more chaos and everyone put his head down without doing any thing to condemn them he or she will be tomorrow in gods hands and he or she needs to prepare an answer to god questions.
 
But, this rich family let you and your likes leave Pakistan, I hope no one of you will stay in Pakistan in the few coming years. ;)
I think our Pakistani brothers have made it clear about who u are... Shall I qout their replies here. ;)


I have already noted that your level of education knowledge and intellectual prowess inhibits discussions.


You may add one more feather to your cap:


You actually have no idea but your submissions on this forum actually encourages neutrals to go to the Iranian point of view

Worthless people get worthless responses, so, don't ever expect me to take you seriously.


I have already noted that your level of education knowledge and intellectual prowess inhibits discussions.


You may add one more feather to your cap:


You actually have no idea but your submissions on this forum actually encourages neutrals to go to the Iranian point of view
 
This is between us and Iranians. Please keep your focus on liberating your country from the Iranian occupation, and maybe ask them politely to stop stealing your oil.
Thanks
based on what you made your conclusion about Iraq-Iran relationship is it because the country ruled in some limit by Shia Muslims, or what.
 
Iran doesn't even consider Iraq a sovereign state.

Iran-rejects-Iraq-1.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-3.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-4.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-7.jpg

...............................................................................................................


Iran-rejects-Iraq-9.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-10.jpg

Iran-rejects-Iraq-11.jpg


Where's the Iraqi flag I wonder ?
They probably just forgot:whistle:
These pictures could altered easily especially from you people? who send terrorest to kill innocent Iraqis wont be hard for them to do any thing for there agenda.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom