What's new

Indian Media claims 100 Chinese Soldiers were Killed in Galwan

So they were attacked by the breed of Wolverine that had the ability to heal rapidly.

Professor xXx here seems proud of 'em.
EcEH2bgWoAAx_ip
 

Yes yes its a fact, over 100 lost due to Indian super powa prowess, Chinese have retreated after surgical attack. Chinese are lying about casualties as stated by bona fide chinese take away owner from california.

India win again....Jai Modi jee ki...56 inch zindabad

master can't lose so much :D
 
Only 100 PLA KIA?

By the end of the year it will be 600!

Indians!!!
Come on, bro.

In Bollywood version of events, 100 PLA KIA would be in the opening scenes. By the end of film, PLA would be nowhere to be seen, and Xi would have been dethroned and replaced...

I recall an Indian movie in which an Indian hero (i.e. Tiger Shroff) eliminated ISIS in a span of 1 hour with his superb acrobatics and kicks.

Baaghi 3

127652-new-72.jpg


Same force which took US-led forces 5 straight years to eradicate across Iraq and Syria (Operation Inherent Resolve; 2014 - 2019). This was in addition to Iran-led contribution to the effort.

You think SMALL...
 

Yes yes its a fact, over 100 lost due to Indian super powa prowess, Chinese have retreated after surgical attack. Chinese are lying about casualties as stated by bona fide chinese take away owner from california.

India win again....Jai Modi jee ki...56 inch zindabad
Actual fact is Chinese lost 40 battalions and one of Indian Col. himself killed 39.5 Battalions alone then take rest for his lunch



Meet Indian Col and his name is not disclosed.:cheers:
 
Retired and hurt PLA veterans could become a force against the Chinese Communist Party regime
b3yangLGchinasoldie_c0-524-1600-1456_s885x516.jpg

When China denies its soldiers’ casualties and PLA illustration by The Washington Times more >

  • China had suffered in the recent clash (with India) in the Galwan Valley. Far from giving out the exact figure, he did not even acknowledge that there were casualties on the Chinese side, saying “I have no information to offer.”

    Yet again, when the question was posed the next day (June 23), Mr. Zhao avoided giving any details from the Chinese side, but was quick to retort that Indian media reports claiming that at least 40 Chinese soldiers were killed was “false information.”

    Incidentally, it was the same spokesman who gave (June 19) a detailed “step-by-step account of the Galwan clash (the Chinese version, of course) and China’s position on settling this incident.”


    Even a week after the incident China has refused to publicly admit that there had been casualties on its side, while India paid last homage to its martyrs with full state honors.

    What country does not even acknowledge the martyrdom of its uniformed soldiers at its borders, let alone pay them a respectable last homage? It is China, which reels under the fear that the admittance that it had lost troops, that too more in number than its opponent, could lead to such major trouble and domestic unrest, that the very regime of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could be put at stake.



    At the root of this fear is the simmering resentment running in the hearts and minds of 57 million veterans of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA).

    If this is the treatment meted out by the CCP regime to the martyrs of today, imagine the plight of PLA veterans, many of whom had participated in the bloody 1979 Sino-Vietnamese War or the Korean War. They have been holding frequent mass protests across China for years now, hoping to shame the government into recognizing its obligation toward those who battled along the country’s borders in the past.

    All they seek is better health care, pensions and jobs, as a mark of due gratitude for their service to the nation. Shockingly however, the country which has the world’s largest army, does not have a central agency to administer pensions and other benefits to its veterans. Resultantly, they are forced to depend on local governments for pensions, medical care and other basic benefits.

    However, due to wide disparity in the financial standings of the local governments, there is no standard or uniformity in what the veterans receive. After having given their youth and shed blood for the country, the veterans find themselves left by the CCP to the mercy of often corrupt local officials, making them feel like “donkeys slaughtered after they are too old to work a grindstone.”

    China’s Ministry of Defense, among its larger efforts of “military reform” orchestrated by Xi Jinping, terminated the old system of China’s army unit numbers and patches and adopted a new one. This change has made it more difficult for the protesting veterans to identify their affinities in the military forces and make appeals to them.


    Separately, fearful of organized mass protests, the Chinese authorities have subjected those veterans found participating in protests to suppression, surveillance, detentions and even beatings. There have been several instances of mysterious deaths of veterans who have been actively petitioning the government for their dues. Media mentions of veteran issues are also strictly censored in the country.

    All this is a far cry from the reverence these PLA veterans once elicited from the CCP, leading them to now even voice regret for having served the army. If such negative sentiments of the veterans is coupled with the rhetoric that the CCP leadership of today does not even acknowledge the lives laid by its soldiers at its borders, referring to the Galwan Valley causalities, the rank-and-file support for CCP leader President Xi Jinping, who is also chairman of the Central Military Commission, would be at grave threat.

    It could also adversely impact Mr. Xi’s ambitious goal of modernizing the PLA by 2035 and to become a top-tier military by 2050, by failing to attract better qualified and highly motivated soldiers.

    The PLA has long been a key pillar of the CCP’s power. If the sentiments of the serving PLA cadres are hurt and they get together with the millions of disgruntled veterans (which may be facilitated by those within the PLA who are already unhappy with Mr. Xi — and there are thousands of them, such as those who were hurt by Mr. Xi’s move to separate PLA from commercial activities), they could form a formidable force capable of challenging Mr. Xi’s leadership.

    Significantly, the CCP leadership cannot afford to undermine the veterans’ potential to launch a collective and “armed” anti-regime action. Hence, the continuing incidence of veterans’ protests, despite significant coercive pressure and bureaucratic measures, is a source of intense anxiety for Xi Jinping and the CCP leadership.

    • Jianli Yang is founder and president of Citizen Power Initiatives for China.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jun/29/retired-and-hurt-pla-veterans-could-become-a-force/


Article in WT by Jianli Yang
Wtf is "Washington Times"?

Is it US News's brother?
 
At least 40 chinease Soldiers were were killed..........And more injured

Many fell off a ridge which collapsed ......... KARMA i think its called
 
So they were attacked by the breed of Wolverine that had the ability to heal rapidly.

Professor xXx here seems proud of 'em.
EcEH2bgWoAAx_ip




Do indians not lie in their hospital beds like the rest of humanity but sit up cross-legged on them instead?
 
Funny though. If they really had the upper-hand. I am sure some would have captured a video or a picture. But this isn't the case. At least 1 measly picture of a captured PLA or a death of a PLA? Instead, they ran and jumped to their deaths. :lol: :lol:

Most likely this has been confiscated.

There must be video footage out there. Apparently the battle went on for hours so both sides must have had someone capturing it on a phone.
 
At least 40 chinease Soldiers were were killed..........And more injured

Many fell off a ridge which collapsed ......... KARMA i think its called

Satellite pictures never showed any change in topography that indicated a collapsed ridge.

Wtf is "Washington Times"?

Is it US News's brother?

It is a conservative rag that echos the hawks/rightwing in the US. A more old school version of Breitbart.
 

Back
Top Bottom