What's new

India's right-wing leader asks China to end religious repression in Tibet

my house? I have two houses, one in North Sydney, worth about $1m, one in Jingan Shanghai, worth about $1.2m, which one you are talking about?

hahaha another internet hardy,who is a multi billionaire tony stark,live the life of Hugh hefner,have multiple condo's, yachts, Bugatti's,who know 10 different Marshall arts,do 500 push ups a day,have 8 pack abs,and spend 300,000 a night in the casino of Vegas,do u think u r the first one we meet here,hahahaha
 
Yes I do, How Many Numbers do you have in your Drate serial key code issued along with the certificate, I mean the One issued for International progeny , Dont tell me the numbers, but just tell me how many Digits and How many Numbers have been provided and how does it differentiate with respect to different Spheres?

Its just a simple testing without having to reveal anything personal...

I guess that like every other cheap quality stuff, this test had an error of 100%. So the claimed 146 could have been ~70 in reality. At least the content of the posts don't point to a number bigger than that.

Will these numbers tell that?
 
hahaha another internet hardy,who is a multi billionaire tony stark,live the life of Hugh hefner,have multiple condo's, yachts, Bugatti's,who know 10 different Marshall arts,do 500 push ups a day,have 8 pack abs,and spend 300,000 a night in the casino of Vegas,do u think u r the first one we meet here,hahahaha

My guess is they are happy meal toy condos and the doctorate is a McDoctorate in making happy meal toys.

I knew McDonalds gave degrees in making burgers. Never knew they started it for happy meal toys as well!
 
I guess that like every other cheap quality stuff, this test had an error of 100%. So the claimed 146 could have been ~70 in reality. At least the content of the posts don't point to a number bigger than that.

Will these numbers tell that?

the number was for his PHD, not the IQ... After every Drate an International Progeny key is given to certify the person eligible of a doctorate, which differs from sphere to sphere... He said he has done his Phd, so thought of asking the total numbers of the key given to him... he has absconded anyway
 
What a load of cr@p!
This character is'nt even connected to the Govt. Neither is he an official nor a legislator. He only happens to be an accused in some criminal cases. If that is some distinction!
Tomorrow, some bloke's dog's trainer's sister's father-in-law's friend will say something; and you will go again: "India is at it again, interfered in China's internal affairs".

then please explain when a private chinses website posting an article on breaking up india into 10 states yours media and to a certain extend GOI making it into succh a serious issue
 
I guess that like every other cheap quality stuff, this test had an error of 100%. So the claimed 146 could have been ~70 in reality. At least the content of the posts don't point to a number bigger than that.

Will these numbers tell that?

are we getting into this IQ arguement again? wether you indians like it or not the reality is chinese 101 indian 81, get use to it



Rank Country IQ estimate[4]
1 Hong Kong 107
2 South Korea 106
3 Japan 105
4 Taiwan 104
5 Singapore 103
6 Austria 102
6 Germany 102
6 Italy 102
6 Netherlands 102
10 Sweden 101
10 Switzerland 101
12 Belgium 100
12 China 100 12 New Zealand 100
12 United Kingdom 100
16 Hungary 99
16 Poland 99
16 Spain 99
19 Australia 98
19 Denmark 98
19 France 98
19 Mongolia 98
19 Norway 98
19 United States 98
25 Canada 97
25 Czech Republic 97
25 Finland 97
28 Argentina 96
28 Russia 96
28 Slovakia 96
28 Uruguay 96
32 Portugal 95
32 Slovenia 95
34 Israel 94
34 Romania 94
36 Bulgaria 93
36 Ireland 93
36 Greece 93
39 Malaysia 92
40 Thailand 91
41 Croatia 90
41 Peru 90
41 Turkey 90
Rank Country IQ estimate[4]
44 Colombia 89
44 Indonesia 89
44 Suriname 89
47 Brazil 87
47 Iraq 87
47 Mexico 87
47 Samoa 87
47 Tonga 87
52 Lebanon 86
52 Philippines 86
54 Cuba 85
54 Morocco 85
56 Fiji 84
56 Iran 84
56 Marshall Islands 84
56 Puerto Rico 84
60 Egypt 83
60 Saudi Arabia 83
60 United Arab Emirates 83
61 India 81 62 Ecuador 80
63 Guatemala 79
64 Barbados 78
64 Nepal 78
64 Qatar 78
67 Zambia 77
68 Congo 73
68 Uganda 73
70 Jamaica 72
70 Kenya 72
70 South Africa 72
70 Sudan 72
70 Tanzania 72
75 Ghana 71
76 Nigeria 67
77 Guinea 66
77 Zimbabwe 66
79 Democratic Republic of the Congo 65
80 Sierra Leone 64
81 Ethiopia 63
82 Equatorial

IQ and the Wealth of Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
the number was for his PHD, not the IQ... After every Drate an International Progeny key is given to certify the person eligible of a doctorate, which differs from sphere to sphere... He said he has done his Phd, so thought of asking the total numbers of the key given to him... he has absconded anyway

Does McDoctorate have this key as well? ;)
 
are we getting into this IQ arguement again? wether you indians like it or not the reality is chinese 101 indian 81, get use to it

Do you know why only some Chinese need to use this useless shyt? Ever seen any civilized person making these idiotic arguments?

It is because this is all you have. No contribution for a 1000 years despite this large IQ? Even now only aping and copying?

Tell me what is the scientific basis of these numbers? What was the sample size? What is the correlation with people's living standard? Education? Economic conditions? Their upbringing?

Tell me the scientific peers who validated this crap and agreed to it being any sort of scientific study?

Just shows the petty mindedness of some, nothing else.

PS: See the quality of data!

For 104 of the 185 nations, no studies were available. In those cases, the authors have used an estimated value by taking averages of the IQs of neighboring or comparable nations. For example, the authors arrived at a figure of 84 for El Salvador by averaging their calculations of 79 for Guatemala and 88 for Colombia. Including those estimated IQs, the correlation of IQ and GDP is 0.62.

To obtain a figure for South Africa, the authors averaged IQ studies done on different ethnic groups, resulting in a figure of 72. The figures for Colombia, Peru, and Singapore were arrived at in a similar manner.

In some cases, the IQ of a country is estimated by averaging the IQs of countries that are not actually neighbors of the country in question. For example, Kyrgyzstan's IQ is estimated by averaging the IQs of Iran and Turkey, neither of which is close to Kyrgyzstan—China, which is a geographic neighbor, is not counted as such by Lynn and Vanhanen. This is presumably because the ethnic groups of the area speak Iranian and Turkic languages, but do not include Chinese.

To account for the Flynn effect (an increase in IQ scores over time), the authors adjusted the results of older studies upward by a number of points
 
Do you know why only some Chinese need to use this useless shyt? Ever seen any civilized person making these idiotic arguments?

It is because this is all you have. No contribution for a 1000 years despite this large IQ? Even now only aping and copying?

Tell me what is the scientific basis of these numbers? What was the sample size? What is the correlation with people's living standard? Education? Economic conditions? Their upbringing?

Tell me the scientific peers who validated this crap and agreed to it being any sort of scientific study?

Just shows the petty mindedness of some, nothing else.

No contribution for 1000 years? I'd educate you, but you are not interested in being educated. There is no cure for hatred. I pity you, not hate you. I do not hate Indians in general. I am great friends with many Indians. B_R_I_C can attest to that. There are dumb racists on every country, some websites happen to concentrate them.
 
No contribution for 1000 years? I'd educate you, but you are not interested in being educated. There is no cure for hatred. I pity you, not hate you. I do not hate Indians in general. I am great friends with many Indians. B_R_I_C can attest to that. There are dumb racists on every country, some websites happen to concentrate them.

I have nothing against China and actually like the country and its people.

The trolls that seem to have converged here are not included. They will get what they deserve.
 
No contribution for 1000 years? I'd educate you, but you are not interested in being educated. There is no cure for hatred. I pity you, not hate you. I do not hate Indians in general. I am great friends with many Indians. B_R_I_C can attest to that. There are dumb racists on every country, some websites happen to concentrate them.

Its remarkable how you choose to overlook Peaceful's very insightful posts and focus on one-sided hatred which is only in response. Everyone respects China for its achievements , the question is even after your success do you really need to denigrate another country with blatantly false statistics and nonsensical statements .....?

All the above statements was in response to peaceful
1) abusing our PM, our democratic setup
2) threatening to bomb us off the map
3) Bragging about his 2 homes
4) Bragging about his Phd and IQ ( still not substantiated )
5) spouting the usual nonsense about slums , etc

A moderate thread was turned into a troll fest by a number of needlessly crazy comments , so please dont cherry-pick any responses out of context and take offense. One single post from you on the first page of the thread, rebuking 'peaceful' could have resolved the situation.
regards,
 
My comments were not towards all Chinese.

They are definitely towards all the "IQ" specialists and others who make an a*s of themselves every day here.
 
last, but not least, as of writing, China has 4 times of your economy, 3 times of the size of your land, yet we don't operate any aircraft carrier! we just allocated another 200 BILLION extra DOLLARS on top of our existing education budget. you tell me which one is the regime.

The one that makes the likes of you do this!

chinarules.jpg


Which one are you in this?

BTW, when your GDP was equal to India and your regime was crushing you under the tanks, was it a regime then? What has changed now?

tiananmen-square.jpg
 

Back
Top Bottom