Exactly Amna. This is what I am saying. But if you see in france , there was a law to ban Burkha and muslims have protested. In UK you have seen Anjem chaudhury. If there is a freedom of writing, people can write anything. But as I said no body get offended and become violent as muslims do when they are offended. You may say they are in minority, but this violent minority exists only in muslims. Russia has banned Bhagvad Geeta. have you ever seen a Hindu become violent for that ? There were some bikinis and under wears where hindu goddess pictures were drawn ? Have you heard they were killed ? That is exactly what I am saying. If Burma is persecuting muslims, why muslims in mubai started a riot for that ? Why a muslim from Pakistan go for jihad to syria ? why so ?
What I am saying is that when you are in minority you demand complete religious freedom, does not matter whether that will offend the majority or not. But when you are in majority, you force your rules on non muslims, dont allow non muslims to preach or practice and also offend them by doing some practices ? Why it was unacceptable for muslims in undivided India to be ruled by a Hindu ? Why Pakistan was demanded then ? Have you ever seen a Hindu in Pakistan or any islamic country demands that we want a separate state since we can not be the ruler or can not preach freely? Dont you think the law which forbids hindus to become a ruler in your country and other islamic countries is the same kind of religious persecution which muslims were fearful about in 1947 ?
or are you jealous 
