What's new

Analysis: Will India’s S-400 missiles checkmate Pakistan?

Status
Not open for further replies.
More like a hyper ugly, starving malnourished elephant. Any nation that has at least a third of the world's severely ultra poor and malnourished is in no position to criticize another nation/race of people:

https://americanfreepress.net/indias-appalling-secret/

Please solve your indian problems before you start to worry about Pakistan's economy

:dirol:
A citizen of a country that cant even match the GDP of a single city in India(Mumbai), is in no position to make this comment.. period
 
Last edited:
A citizen country that cant even match the GDP of a single city in India(Mumbai), is in no position to make this comment.. period

That gdp and those figures become meaningless and void when nearly 40% of the world's most hyper malnourisehed and super poor are in your country and belong to your race. Not mine's.
 
India has achieved 44% reduction in the percentage of poor people between 2001 and 2011: PEW Survey

Try matching the figures :)

And do something about your GDP, its dreadfully awful. Weren't you trying to buy jets from US, out of alms from US ? How pathetic is that ?

Not as awful, dreadful or pathetic as having nearly 40% of the world most ultra poor and destitute within your nation.

Something's gone disasterously wrong since 2011 for india because here is an american article from a few weeks ago:

https://americanfreepress.net/indias-appalling-secret/

I'd rather have a poor economy on paper then have nearly 40% of the world's most super malnourished and poor belonging to my race and nation.

Also manipulating and changing the parameters to make it look like poverty reduction does not change this horrific reality:

http://m.firstpost.com/business/eco...ne-that-shows-67-of-india-is-poor-993241.html
 
Not as awful, dreadful or pathetic as having nearly 40% of the world most ultra poor and destitute within your nation.

Something's gone disasterously wrong since 2011 for india because here is an american article from a few weeks ago:

https://americanfreepress.net/indias-appalling-secret/

I'd rather have a poor economy on paper then have nearly 40% of the world's most super malnourished and poor belonging to my race and nation.

Also manipulating and changing the parameters to make it look like poverty reduction does not change this horrific reality:

http://m.firstpost.com/business/eco...ne-that-shows-67-of-india-is-poor-993241.html
You are shifting goal post from mighty pakistani military now you shifted to indian poverty.
This thread is for pakistani answer to mighty S-400.
 
You are shifting goal post from mighty pakistani military now you shifted to indian poverty.
This thread is for pakistani answer to mighty S-400.

Well said and point taken. But that was actually started by one of your compatriots not me.
 
S-400 or any sort of air defense weapon is meant to be defensive purpose, to use it as offensive or you can say hit us within our territory Indian forces have to deploy this close to border which put them under direct threat of battlefield weapons. Even Special Forces can seriously pose risk for those weapons.

You are shifting goal post from mighty pakistani military now you shifted to indian poverty.
This thread is for pakistani answer to mighty S-400.
Check my above post and dear deal is still on talk even not on papers and you can easily estimate the delivery time of few years and you may know better we Pakistanis are quite creative to adopt counter measures as soon as you got the delivery a direct response to this threat will be demonstrated. Cheers
 
No 1 Pakstani = 6 Indians as shown in Kargil.
Sorry. The equation was 1 Pakistani = 20
In 1971, 90,000 Pakistani militants/troops surrendered to 800,000 Indian troops/Bangladeshi militants. Not to mention the Pakistani's were running out of supplies and had no air or naval support once they surrendered. Them fighting would have been suicide.
Ignorance is bliss or are you spouting rubbish for propaganda purposes?

The total strength of Pak and Indian Forces in BD, then East Pakistan was:

India - 665,000 troops.
Pakistan - 365, 000 troops.

That's a ratio of less than 1:2.

Secondly, you said Pakistan Army was running out of supplies? That's far from the truth. In cantonment after cantonment more than 6 months rations were discovered stocked after the Pak forces surrendered! So the PA could well have fought for another 6 months but surrendered instead.
 
Sorry. The equation was 1 Pakistani = 20

Ignorance is bliss or are you spouting rubbish for propaganda purposes?

The total strength of Pak and Indian Forces in BD, then East Pakistan was:

India - 665,000 troops.
Pakistan - 365, 000 troops.

That's a ratio of less than 1:2.

Secondly, you said Pakistan Army was running out of supplies? That's far from the truth. In cantonment after cantonment more than 6 months rations were discovered stocked after the Pak forces surrendered! So the PA could well have fought for another 6 months but surrendered instead.
I would like to smoke what you are smoking
 
I would like to smoke what you are smoking
I smoke Dunhill which you can't afford! :P Try adulterated Afghan weed instead. It's far cheaper!
smoking-dope-019.gif


Seriously, you need to learn the habit of reading international as well as Pakistani publications and papers on your 1971 debacle instead of relying only on your propaganda machine!
 
Last edited:
Sorry. The equation was 1 Pakistani = 20

Ignorance is bliss or are you spouting rubbish for propaganda purposes?

The total strength of Pak and Indian Forces in BD, then East Pakistan was:

India - 665,000 troops.
Pakistan - 365, 000 troops.

That's a ratio of less than 1:2.

Secondly, you said Pakistan Army was running out of supplies? That's far from the truth. In cantonment after cantonment more than 6 months rations were discovered stocked after the Pak forces surrendered! So the PA could well have fought for another 6 months but surrendered instead.
They could have resisted for few days in at least defensive position and the US was coming.They lost there MORAL and history created of largest surrender after second world war.
 
I smoke Dunhill which you can't afford! :P Try adulterated Afghan weed instead. It's far cheaper!
smoking-dope-019.gif


Seriously, you need to learn the habit of reading international as well as Pakistani publications and papers on your 1971 debacle instead of relying only on your propaganda machine!
Sorry. The equation was 1 Pakistani = 20

Ignorance is bliss or are you spouting rubbish for propaganda purposes?

The total strength of Pak and Indian Forces in BD, then East Pakistan was:

India - 665,000 troops.
Pakistan - 365, 000 troops.

That's a ratio of less than 1:2.

Secondly, you said Pakistan Army was running out of supplies? That's far from the truth. In cantonment after cantonment more than 6 months rations were discovered stocked after the Pak forces surrendered! So the PA could well have fought for another 6 months but surrendered instead.


You havn't included the at least 1 million figure of armed bengali insurgents fighting alongside the indian army. Out of that 365,000 of so called "Pakistani troops", at least 250,000 were in fact bengali soldiers who were all switching sides. So the reality is that there were at most 165,000 real Pakistani soldiers (with no supply line) vs 665,000 indian soldiers + at least 1,000,000 armed and well supplied bengali insurgents. Odds thst even the americans and israelis cannot overcome. The indians and bengalis completed encircled us the same way the soviets encircled the German 6th army at stalingrad in 1943.

They could have resisted for few days in at least defensive position and the US was coming.They lost there MORAL and history created of largest surrender after second world war.


Resistance was pointless. Whatever the outcome of the war, bangladesh would have eventually been created. Everyone knows it. You cannot form a nation that is seperated from one another by 1000s of kms wherby the people are completely different to one another in terms of culture, heritage, way of life, genetics, physical appearence and race. It is the same reason why Pakistan was created in 1947. On that basis it is way more feasible for Pakistan to form a nation with Iran and Turkey. 2 nations us Pakistanis have far more in common with than bengladesh.
 
Moderators seriously need to get to work and do their job. It's becoming nauseating having to read offensive and nasty comments by Indian posters without any penalty. Time and again these trolls have hijacked good threads and deliberately ruined discussions, consequently abusing their privileges to post on this forum. Something needs to be done.
 
Moderators seriously need to get to work and do their job. It's becoming nauseating having to read offensive and nasty comments by Indian posters without any penalty. Time and again these trolls have hijacked good threads and deliberately ruined discussions, consequently abusing their privileges to post on this forum. Something needs to be done.


We are very lenient with the world's most ugliest sub-human creatures from the east. We would never enjoy that freedom on their forums.
 
You havn't included the at least 1 million figure of armed bengali insurgents fighting alongside the indian army.
1 million Mukti Bahini?? :blink: :omghaha: There were less than 120,000! Get your facts straight bro!

And then you want to compare a rag tag circus of chappal wearing, dhoti clad yahoos to what you guys claim is the strongest army in the world - the Pak Army? .............Oh well, no comments! :whistle:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom