What's new

Why India is an illegitimate nation

We should be in our own race to reduce poverty, unemployment and illiteracy. We should be fighting together to eliminate these things in our countries, not spread more hatred. Healthy competition is good for us.

hows going? we find the list of NICs where our GDP on PPP per capita match with Philippines, near to Indonesia also. here, is the Philippines-Indonesia also the countries where poor don't sleep hungry? hows many countries would be in world where poor don't sleep hungry? my last posts :-)
.
 
here we have news as below, India is among nations who give 'free Ration/food' to 2/3rd population, if they exercise their rights in India :coffee:

what about other South Asian nations? do they offer the same for their poor? how many countries in world where poor don't sleep hungry? it cost India budget around $30bil per year :-)
.
=>

Free ration to the poor will be extended for 5 years, 80 crore will benefit: Modi

"During Covid-19, the biggest concern of the poor was what they would feed their children... Then I decided that I will not let any poor sleep hungry, hence the BJP government started the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana," PM Modi said.

.

=> https://www.businesstoday.in/latest...for-next-five-years-pm-modi-404558-2023-11-04

BJP-led Centre to extend free ration scheme for 80 crore poor for next five years. PM Narendra Modi made the announcement at a rally in Chhattisgarh. According to government officials, this move will incur an expenditure of approximately Rs 2 lakh crore.

We should be in our own race to reduce poverty, unemployment and illiteracy. We should be fighting together to eliminate these things in our countries, not spread more hatred. Healthy competition is good for us.

.

Why does ⅔ of the population rely on state rations?

my family dont. people of my colony also looks the same in Lucknow :-)

but in tough time, this is the option available for we all in India :enjoy:
 
here is a class on how Indian economy fell during British presence in India.
Indian economy fell from 17% of World GDP to 2% during British presence in India :-)

.
=> this class discuss the graph as below :coffee:
Screen%20Shot%202012-06-20%20at%209.37.55%20AM-thumb-615x284-90639[1].png


.
 

More 2,000 years in a single graphic

Did JP Morgan's striking chart on 2,000 years of economic history bungle the x-axis? Why yes, it did.

AAAGGGGHHHH! How could Michael Cembalest of JP Morgan do it? Did he really produce a stunning chart of global economic history—but compress the time-series on the x-axis in horrid, improper ways?

Why yes, he really did.

Wipe away the tears from your eyes if you're an economist, or the frothy-mouthed rage from your face if you're an infographic designer. As the chart below shows, the first increment of time is 1,000 years. The next, same-sized increment is compressed into 500 years. This is followed by increments of some 100 years, 80, 30, 20, even one of 13 years and 27 years. It ends with a few decades and an eight-year increment.

View attachment 964615
2econhist-jpmorgan-june12[1].jpg


If hauled before the infographics court of law, Mr Cembalest would surely be sentenced to many years of studying Edward Tufte's works on the dos and don'ts of visualising quantitative information. There are few strict rules of infographics. But Mr Cembalest somehow smashed into one of the biggest and most obvious of them.
How does Mr Cembalest plea? In a quick email exchange, he writes:

Graphic detail sentences him guilty as charged. We are dismayed on two counts.

First, the information contained in the chart is extraordinary and deserves to be presented in its full flavour. As the compressed time series from his report on June 18th highlights, at the start of the common era, Asia represented around three-fourths of global output (measured in gross domestic product). Its dominance lasted until as recently as 1860, when the industrial revolution in the Europe and America pumped up those economies. At their zenith around 1950, they accounted for four-fifths of output and have since been on relative decline. :-)

In other words, the current hand-wringing over the ascent of Asia needs to be seen in historical context: as the restoration of Asian economic supremacy after a small blip. As Derek Thompson at The Atlantic rightly simplifies it in a blog post, "everything to the left of 1800 is an approximation of population distribution around the world and everything to the right of 1800 is a demonstration of productivity divergences around the world."

Second, we lament our ruling because we are huge fans of Mr Cembalest's work, especially his delightful chart last year to explain the Eurozone crisis by way of Lego figurines (available here, from Wired).

As for giving credit where it is due, the figures underlying the chart come from the late Angus Maddison, who pioneered the retrospective quantification of economic measurement (as described in our tribute to him). Many people are familiar with the data as the basis of the famous TEDTalk by Hans Rosling of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, who presented the information as an animated infographic using Gapminder software.

The Economist has developed its own infographics of 2,000 years of economic history with Mr Maddison's data. One in 2010, nicknamed "GDP since Jesus" charts just that (below, with commentary here). We encountered the same layout difficulties as Mr Cembalest, so chose a bar chart to distinguish specific years, and fiddled with the spacing of increments on the x-axis to designate missing chunks of time. The result is imperfect, but we did as much as possible to disclose, not camouflage, the imperfections. (In retrospect, we should have done more on the right-hand side of the chart, such as perhaps making the bar widths proportionately thinner….)

View attachment 964620
22-201034nac119[1].jpg

:-)

A second chart from last year (below, and with a commentary here) is both simple and startling. Among the points it presents is that in the first decade of the 21st century, the population of the world produced more economic output than in the first 19 centuries of the common era combined.

 
India is less a nation than a zoo. Like a zoo, there are various sections belonging to various species- apes, tigers, donkeys. India has its own sequestered regions for its various sub-species like the Punjabis, the Telugus, the Tamils, the Bengalis, the Gujuratis, the Sinhalese. It hardly functions as a unified nation with a unified ideology or religion. How Iran can be argued as an ideal example for balkanization along ethnic lines by these supposed international relations scholars, and this dysfunctional heap of dung in Asia is not, points to the importance of Western strategic interests in determining what a country is and what it is not. Add this ethnic salad to a dysfunctional and atavistic caste system, and you have even greater levels of complexity. I can see why swathes of the population of India seek to be white and bleach their skins. I would be too confused about myself if I belonged to such a country as well.
 
Then some will argue so is Pakistan... See how this works? This thread is retarded.
karmi-wearing-dungarees.gif

British got Lahore, Peshawar, Multan and Kashmir from Sikh Empire Ranjit Singh's. then here, is today's Pakistan is Sikh Rule? :enjoy:
they even have the pension record for Maratha rulers and Sikh rulers during 19th century....

=>
the Sikh Empire was a regional power based in the Punjab region of South Asia.[8] It existed from 1799, when Maharaja Ranjit Singh captured Lahore, to 1849, when it was defeated and conquered by the British East India Company in the 'Second' Anglo-Sikh War.
en.wikipedia.org

Sikh Empire - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Sikh Empire at 1839
Sikh_Empire_tri-lingual[1].jpg

View attachment 965302
Maratha Empire at its peak in 1758 (Yellow)


Ultimately, the Third Anglo-Maratha War (1817–1818) resulted in the loss of Maratha independence. It left the British in control of most of the Indian subcontinent. The Peshwa was exiled to Bithoor (Marat, near Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh) as a pensioner of the British.

.
 
Last edited:
Wikipedia says its Maratha they fought with, post#5 as below, Mughal had no resistance to foreign powers during early 1800s.

"if you can't change a story, it's then a truth and would be accepted." this is post#5 of the above thread with news of Wikipedia :enjoy:
 
sir, have a look on story of Sikh Empire upto 1849, with Sikh Empire map post#55.

from here, did British got Lahore from Sikh Empire? so, does this mean Lahore belong to Sikh Empire, to Maharaja Ranjit SIngh, as, now British got Lahore from Sikh Empire?...

where were Mughal during wars of 19th century, from 1800s to 1849? how Mughal fought for Lahore? who gave Lahore to British? :-)

we have even the pension history for Maratha rulers and Sikh Rulers during 19th century..... no pension news of Mughal/Muslims during second half of 19th century?
 
sir, have a look on story of Sikh Empire upto 1849, with Sikh Empire map post#55.

from here, did British got Lahore from Sikh Empire? so, does this mean Lahore belong to Sikh Empire, to Maharaja Ranjit SIngh, as, now British got Lahore from Sikh Empire?...

where were Mughal during wars of 19th century, from 1800s to 1849? how Mughal fought for Lahore? who gave Lahore to British? :-)

we have even the pension history for Maratha rulers and Sikh Rulers during 19th century..... no pension news of Mughal/Muslims during second half of 19th century?
Make a map with arrows pointing it out. I can't understand this rambling
 
Why India is an illegitimate nation

British won India from the Muslim kings like the Mughals.

So when the Brtish left India, the ownership of India should go to the Muslims not Hindus.
almost all people of Indian sub-continent are descendants of Hindus anyway, so it doesn't really matter
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom