What's new

China makes inroads in Sri Lanka

Sorry we don't take mandate from heaven.

The fact is mate communist states are artificial states, so is China. Look at the case of USSR, Czechoslovakia, Former Yugoslavia they were all artificial states. Same way Germany was artificially two countries because of communism and same with Koreans. When communism ended they got their original shapes.

Even Chinese know this that's why their government invented a term known as Han to create a sense of unity among ethnically diverse Chinese and provoking mass Han migration in other areas.
 
I opened a thread named China makes Inroad in Srilank, but find out some history students from India China and Germany fighting about some history lesson. What a joke these keybord wariors are.
PDF should open a History section.

Bcs some Chinese just can't respect India as a nation.
 
Sorry we don't take mandate from heaven.

In China it was the Mandate of Heaven, in Europe it was the Divine Right of King to legitimate succession. What about in India?

The fact is mate communist states are artificial states, so is China. Look at the case of USSR, Czechoslovakia, Former Yugoslavia they were all artificial states. Same way Germany was artificially two countries because of communism and same with Koreans. When communism ended they got their original shapes.

What about Vietnam, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Albania, Romania, Cuba?

Even Chinese know this that's why their government invented a term known as Han to create a sense of unity among ethnically diverse Chinese and provoking mass Han migration in other areas.

Source please!
 
Götterdämmerung;3025862 said:
In China it was the Mandate of Heaven, in Europe it was the Divine Right of King to legitimate succession. What about in India?

We crown ourselves & answerable to ourselves. Unlike China king was not a demi God in India.
 
We crown ourselves & answerable to ourselves. Unlike China king was not a demi God in India.

We are talking about claims of succession legitimacy of the previous regime. The Europeans did that with divine right of the king, the Chinese did that with mandate of heaven.
 
Götterdämmerung;3025862 said:
What about Vietnam, Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Albania, Romania, Cuba?

Because they all have single linguistic group, otherwise most of the communist states are invented countries against the wish and aspiration of majority population.
 
Götterdämmerung;3025924 said:
We are talking about claims of succession legitimacy of the previous regime. The Europeans did that with divine right of the king, the Chinese did that with mandate of heaven.

Its all based on the assumption that King is the representative of God on Earth. We don't had such a concept.

The only exception may be the king that ruled my part of India, who donated his kingdom to the deity of the Royal Temple and ruled till 1947 with the title meaning 'Servant of God'.
 
Götterdämmerung;3025862 said:
Source please!

Just google what was the demography in Xinjiang back in 1949 and now in 2012.
 
Because they all have single linguistic group, otherwise most of the communist states are invented countries against the wish and aspiration of majority population.

Yugoslavia as well as Czechoslovakia were practically monolingual as well, the difference between Serbian and Croatian respectively Czech and Slovakian is smaller than between Hochdeutsch and Bavarian.

Its all based on the assumption that King is the representative of God on Earth. We don't had such a concept.

The only exception may be the king that ruled my part of India, who donated his kingdom to the deity of the Royal Temple and ruled till 1947 with the title meaning 'Servant of God'.

If so, did the Indian rulers have a secular claim of succession like the different republics in France (from the first to the present fifth), Germany (Weimar Republic, Federal Republic) and China (ROC, PRC)?

Just google what was the demography in Xinjiang back in 1949 and now in 2012.

Err, you claimed that the Han ethnic was invented by the government. Which government? Source please!
 
Guys china is superior to india in creativity n other things, because there is one voice in china unlike india, ndia has tritors like alu prasad yadaw, mulamay singh yaday, sonia, sharad pawar n host others....india is foooked up against china. Well thats politically...
 
Guys, this is about Chinese investment in Sri Lanka, where do all these "ancient monks, communist" come from? :) As to the encirclement, China doesn't need to build road, airport and other infrastructures if it wants to encircle India, one military base is good enough. Cannot we interpret this as "Chinese companies try to make money in Sri Lanka because of its geographic location?" I agree this is not charity but in the meantime Sri Lanka also benefit from it. A stable and prosperous Sri Lanka is also of Indian's interest, isn't it?
 
Götterdämmerung;3026043 said:
If so, did the Indian rulers have a secular claim of succession like the different republics in France (from the first to the present fifth), Germany (Weimar Republic, Federal Republic) and China (ROC, PRC)?

Pretty much so..They claimed the land but not the succession unless they belong to the same dynasty.

Treating the king as some sort of God as seen in China/ Japan was non existent in India.
 
This thread was about China and Srilanka relation BUT indians once again hijacked it.

You forgot the Chinese.

Guys, this is about Chinese investment in Sri Lanka, where do all these "ancient monks, communist" come from? :) As to the encirclement, China doesn't need to build road, airport and other infrastructures if it wants to encircle India, one military base is good enough. Cannot we interpret this as "Chinese companies try to make money in Sri Lanka because of its geographic location?" I agree this is not charity but in the meantime Sri Lanka also benefit from it. A stable and prosperous Sri Lanka is also of Indian's interest, isn't it?

This port was said to be non -profitable by the Indians...hope to see how it turns out. If it indeed turns out to be a profitable venture, the Indian policy makers should jump into the IO.
 
Götterdämmerung;3026043 said:
Yugoslavia as well as Czechoslovakia were practically monolingual as well, the difference between Serbian and Croatian respectively Czech and Slovakian is smaller than between Hochdeutsch and Bavarian.



If so, did the Indian rulers have a secular claim of succession like the different republics in France (from the first to the present fifth), Germany (Weimar Republic, Federal Republic) and China (ROC, PRC)?



Err, you claimed that the Han ethnic was invented by the government. Which government? Source please!

First part: There is something called sense of having one language or sense of considering own language different from other.

Last Part: Han is indeed an invented term to create balance against recognized minority groups of China. If you want to know, pls google that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom