What's new

Modi's water war: India fast-tracks hydro projects in IoK

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Modi's water war: India fast-tracks hydro projects in IoK
l_192675_105443_updates.jpg


NEW DELHI: India has fast-tracked hydropower projects worth $15 billion in Occupied Kashmir in recent months, three federal and state officials said, ignoring warnings from Islamabad that power stations on rivers flowing into Pakistan will disrupt water supplies.

The swift approval of projects that had languished for years came after Prime Minister Narendra Modi suggested last year that sharing the waterways could be conditional on Pakistan clamping down on anti-India militants that New Delhi says it shelters.

Pakistan has opposed some of these projects before, saying they violate a World Bank-mediated treaty on the sharing of the Indus river and its tributaries upon which 80 percent of its irrigated agriculture depends.

The schemes, the largest of which is the 1,856 MW Sawalkote plant, will take years to complete, but their approval could prove a flashpoint between the nuclear-armed neighbors at a time when relations are at a low ebb.

"I say the way you look at these projects, it is not purely a hydro project. Broaden it to a strategic water management, border management problem, and then you put in money," said Pradeep Kumar Pujari, the top ranking official in the power ministry.

Pakistan's foreign ministry spokesman, Nafees Zakaria, said he would confer with the Ministry of Water and Power on the proposed Indian projects, saying it was a technical matter.

He noted, however, that India would be attending a regular meeting of the Indus Commission later this month in Lahore, even though the broader peace dialogue was on hold.

"It seems that finally India has realized the importance of this mechanism under the IWT (Indus Waters Treaty) for resolving water disputes related to the Indus water and its tributaries."

TRIPLE POWER

Six hydro projects in Indian Occupied Kashmir either cleared viability tests or the more advanced environment and forest expert approvals in the last three months, two officials in India's Water Resources Ministry and the Central Electricity Authority said separately.

Together these projects on the Chenab river, a tributary of the Indus, would triple hydropower generation in IoK from the current level of 3,000 MW, the biggest jump in decades, added the officials, declining to be named because the approvals had not yet been made public.

"We have developed barely one-sixth of the hydropower capacity potential in the state in the last 50 years," the senior official at the Water Resources Ministry said.

"Then one fine morning, you see we cleared six to seven projects in three months; it definitely raises concern in Pakistan."

Pakistan's water supply is dwindling because of climate change, outdated farming techniques and an exploding population.

A 2011 report by the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations said New Delhi could use these projects as a way to control Pakistan's supplies from the Indus, seen as its jugular vein.

"The cumulative effect of these projects could give India the ability to store enough water to limit the supply to Pakistan at crucial moments in the growing season," it said.

India says the projects are "run-of-the-river" schemes that use the river's flow and elevation to generate electricity rather than large reservoirs, and do not contravene the treaty.

Environmental groups have questioned whether the government has followed proper procedures in fast-tracking projects located in a highly seismic area.

"BLOOD AND WATER"

Modi told a meeting of government officials on the Indus treaty last year that "blood and water cannot flow together", soon after India blamed militants allegedly based in Pakistan for a deadly attack on its troops in Uri.

Modi's message was two-fold, Indian foreign ministry spokesman Gopal Baglay said. Terrorism had to stop and India must fully utilize the economic potential available to it within the Indus treaty.

The projects that have won technical approvals in recent months are Sawalkote, Kwar, Pakal Dul, Bursar and Kirthai I and II.

Most of the projects have been held up for at least a decade awaiting multiple clearances. Sawalkote, which was cleared by a government-constituted environment committee in January, was first given techno-economic approval in 1991.

It is now up for forest clearance from the state authorities, after which the government will finalize financing and begin construction.

Some projects like Pakal Dul were stuck in litigation, but that has been resolved, Jammu and Kashmir's Power Minister Nirmal Singh told Reuters in the summer capital Srinagar. "Things are now in a position of take-off," he said.

In January, senior federal officials made a presentation on energy security to Modi in which they proposed interest subsidies and long-term loans for hydroprojects above 100 MW, according to the document seen by Reuters.

But Himanshu Thakkar, coordinator of South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers & People, said some projects had been cleared without impact assessment studies and public consultation.

"It's on one river, the Chenab, where you are doing so many projects. This is a very vulnerable region. It's landslide-prone, it's flash flood-prone, earthquake-prone."
 
India has right to 20% of water on Western Rivers.. and 80% of water on Eastern Rivers... India should exploit that allocated resources. Pakistan should exploit their quota of water rather than crying on India's efforts.
in the name of share india is trying to deprieve us of our shre which will later deprieve world of hinduism. We would go to any extent to get our share. It's our redline.
 
in the name of share india is trying to deprieve us of our shre which will later deprieve world of hinduism. We would go to any extent to get our share. It's our redline.
Your leadership has helped your country waste 80% of Pakistan's share ... here is something that might help: https://www.dawn.com/news/661616

You guys need to utilize your own share properly...
 
India must sell electricity generated from these projects to Pakistan at 20% discount.

50% discount in other fields like tourism, education, medical and trade transit viz a viz Kashmir region is concerned.
 
India is not breaking any treaty.. India is exploiting its own share properly... whereas Pakistan is wasting their share.

Brother that is not the topic Pakistan is wasting their share or not. The point is India must sell electricity to Pakistan at discounted rates. This is the theme of disputed area, you share at discounted rates. This is how you move forward.
 
Brother that is not the topic Pakistan is wasting their share or not. The point is India must sell electricity to Pakistan at discounted rates. This is the theme of disputed area, you share at discounted rates. This is how you move forward.
Why would India sell electricity to Pakistan?
There is no dispute ...Pakistan has illegally captured a piece of land that belongs of Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir.
 
Why would India sell electricity to Pakistan?
There is no dispute ...Pakistan has illegally captured a piece of land that belongs of Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir.

We can say the same India has illegally captured etc. etc. You want to find a way or not? You want to spill more blood? Both have justifications, so both have to go one step backwards.
 
India must sell electricity generated from these projects to Pakistan at 20% discount.

50% discount in other fields like tourism, education, medical and trade transit viz a viz Kashmir region is concerned.
Forget it. Not going to happen.
 
Brother that is not the topic Pakistan is wasting their share or not. The point is India must sell electricity to Pakistan at discounted rates. This is the theme of disputed area, you share at discounted rates. This is how you move forward.
Does Pakistan share it's share of electricity with India, That they are producing from water that flows from disputed teorritory to there dams?
And @50% discounted rate for complete J&K ?
:what:
Your idea is as helarious as

 
We can say the same India has illegally captured etc. etc. You want to find a way or not? You want to spill more blood? Both have justifications, so both have to go one step backwards.
Doesn't matter. More blood less blood. Doesn't matter.
 

Back
Top Bottom