What's new

Why India Occupied Siachen?

Look beyond the 'wording' of the article, guys.

Try to understand and appreciate the gist of the matter.
 
nope...its purpose is to force you guys to demarcate border of this area properly...else you guys captured this area and we would lost another few thousand sq km...
How would you have lost something you never had in the first place? Fucklogic.

Look beyond the 'wording' of the article, guys.

Try to understand and appreciate the gist of the matter.
Yes, Siachen has nothing to do with J&K, it's somewhere completely different, thus India has no claims to start with.
 
There is no demarcation of LoC, therefore it is best to mark the line on the map and gradually demilitarise the area on both sides
 
Pakistan entered Kargil (what's to occupy if Kashmir belongs to Pakistan anyway ;)) just like india illegally entered Siachen.
 
Siachen Glacier has no significant strategic importance... Issue is entirely based on ego.

Both the sides must de-militarize the region and follow the accords of Karachi and Shimla.
 
India occupied Siachin, when Pak was busy in Afghan-Soviet war, and didn't expect Indian will do this back stabbing. Indian as usual took advantage and sneak in. Otherwise they knew by fighting they are not capable of taking over.
That's the problem Indian govt time after time do act of mistrust. And will remain like this.That was major incidence after interference in Bangladesh.
 
Pakistan entered Kargil (what's to occupy if Kashmir belongs to Pakistan anyway ;)) just like india illegally entered Siachen.

pak got kick..in both kargil and siachen...is that why you wanted to say??? :lol: :lol:

India occupied Siachin, when Pak was busy in Afghan-Soviet war, and didn't expect Indian will do this back stabbing. Indian as usual took advantage and sneak in. Otherwise they knew by fighting they are not capable of taking over.
That's the problem Indian govt time after time do act of mistrust. And will remain like this.That was major incidence after interference in Bangladesh.

really???well...is it you are going to tell your child???because the whole world know otherwise...pak tried but india sprinted and captured it..
 
Pakistan entered Kargil (what's to occupy if Kashmir belongs to Pakistan anyway ;)) just like india illegally entered Siachen.

Then you lost Kargil again :)

India occupied Siachin, when Pak was busy in Afghan-Soviet war, and didn't expect Indian will do this back stabbing. Indian as usual took advantage and sneak in. Otherwise they knew by fighting they are not capable of taking over.
That's the problem Indian govt time after time do act of mistrust. And will remain like this.That was major incidence after interference in Bangladesh.

That's what will happen if you fight somebody else war for money.....:rofl:

By the way your statement is creation of your idiot mind.
 
I would advise my Pakistani brothers and sisters to not to respond to indian trolling, we will continue our battle against the evil forces of bharti civilization till judgement day. india our eternal enemy.

This is the spirit with which our mothers send to defend the mother of us all - our motherland, to die in the service of the mother.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I disagree with the title moving your defence forces to a strategic area which we consider is our, is not "occupying".
 
THIS IS SIACHIN

2a9c0477.jpg

This is infraction!
 

Back
Top Bottom