What's new

Why the Indian Establishment, Modi, and BJP hate and fear Imran Khan!

Kartarpur corridor.

"Baray office may chotay log".

Speaking against Islamophobia at appropriate forums.

IK whether you agree or not was a big hurdle in indian modi dream to isolate Pakistan internationally. The guy literally won respect amongst indians (sane ones).

Feb 19, no hesitation shown.

Obviously the personality, IK vs modi.

IK is not perfect but it does show you a glimpse of what type of leaders Pakistan can have if they let merit to prevail.
As an Indian, I am really curious about what kind of people support Imran Khan. I guess Pakistani voters don't have many good options, given that the alternatives are corrupt and dynastic parties, but I thought Pakistan was a relatively conservative society. Don't people have a problem with Khan Sahab's womanising, sex tapes , doing nainsaafi with his own daughter? And it is not like he is completely clean either. How is buying toshakhana gifts at huge discount and then selling them off in the Gulf not corruption?

I am ignoring his U-turns and habit of running international leaders the wrrong way for now.

Do PTI supporters really believe that Tyrian White is not Imran's daughter or that the sex tapes with Ayla Malik were fake ? Or that it is acceptable for a Prime Minister to make huge profits off toshakhana gifts?
 
Kartarpur corridor.

"Baray office may chotay log".

Speaking against Islamophobia at appropriate forums.

IK whether you agree or not was a big hurdle in indian modi dream to isolate Pakistan internationally. The guy literally won respect amongst indians (sane ones).

Feb 19, no hesitation shown.

Obviously the personality, IK vs modi.

IK is not perfect but it does show you a glimpse of what type of leaders Pakistan can have if they let merit to prevail.

Nope, he is biggest helper from Pakistan if you talk about India. India used to convince the world that we don't want talk to Pak government because nothing under their control.

Imran khan helped us to convinced the world and confirmed that PM of Pakistan is just front face but all decisions usually taken by the establishment.

We only consider during the recent past Musharraf as a true Pakistani nationalist leader who given the tough time to India
 
Last edited:
As an Indian, I am really curious about what kind of people support Imran Khan. I guess Pakistani voters don't have many good options, given that the alternatives are corrupt and dynastic parties, but I thought Pakistan was a relatively conservative society. Don't people have a problem with Khan Sahab's womanising, sex tapes , doing nainsaafi with his own daughter? And it is not like he is completely clean either. How is buying toshakhana gifts at huge discount and then selling them off in the Gulf not corruption?

I am ignoring his U-turns and habit of running international leaders the wrrong way for now.

Do PTI supporters really believe that Tyrian White is not Imran's daughter or that the sex tapes with Ayla Malik were fake ? Or that it is acceptable for a Prime Minister to make huge profits off toshakhana gifts?

Can anyone deny that women didn't fall for him? Even inian celebrities. He may or may not have committed adultery, but no one can judge him for that. I think you have no idea what others have been doing or have done. At least the guy owns it. "Only the ones who haven't sin should cast the first stone".

Toshakhana ... does it even come close to Avenfield or surrey palace and many others?

Has he tried promoting his sons in Pakistani politics?

The thing is he made many within and without Pakistan, insecure.

As I said, he is not perfect, but just a glimpse of what Pakistan can have if they rid themselves of dynastic politics and let merit prevail.

Nope, he is biggest helper from Pakistan if you talk about India. India used to convince the world that we don't want talk to Pak government because nothing under their control.

Imran khan helped us to convinced the world and confirmed that PM of Pakistan is just front face but all decisions usually taken by the establishment.

We only consider during the recent past Musharraf as a true Pakistani nationalist leader who given the tough time to India

What are you even trying to say?

If being an indian you wish to have people to people contact with Pakistanis, you will support IK.

Your establishment and politicians same as Pakistani don't want that. Just think about it.

We only consider during the recent past Musharraf as a true Pakistani nationalist leader who given the tough time to India

 
What are you even trying to say?

If being an indian you wish to have people to people contact with Pakistanis, you will support IK.

Your establishment and politicians same as Pakistani don't want that. Just think about it.

It makes no difference who the prime minister of Pakistan is when it comes to India and Pakistan; everything is under the authority of your establishment, and without their approval, your PM won't do a thing.

No matter who is sitting in the prime minister's chair, once your organization decides to have a positive relationship with India, there will be progress and people-to-people engagement.

However, that will never happen since your establishment will never be able to adapt to normalcy. Normal times do not involve the army establishment playing such a significant role.
 
It makes no difference who the prime minister of Pakistan is when it comes to India and Pakistan; everything is under the authority of your establishment, and without their approval, your PM won't do a thing.

No matter who is sitting in the prime minister's chair, once your organization decides to have a positive relationship with India, there will be progress and people-to-people engagement.

However, that will never happen since your establishment will never be able to adapt to normalcy. Normal times do not involve the army establishment playing such a significant role.

Suppose Pakistani establishment agrees to india, just suppose …. do you think indian military will reduce at least half to its size and forgo the budget?
 
Can anyone deny that women didn't fall for him?
Being a ladies man is one thing. Fathering an illegitimate child, refusing to acknowledge her despite a court order and lying about it in an affidavit is quite another.

Toshakhana ... does it even come close to Avenfield or surrey palace and many others?
Actually, it is worse. At least Zardari and Patwaris sold their zameer for palaces. Niazi sold it for watches and rugs.
 
Except what you've said is pretty idiotic, and makes no sense what so ever.

He was probably the most logic driven civilian PM that Pakistan has ever had.

He got fucked by the corrupt. In a corrupt nation like Pakistan he was either going to succeed, or he was going to be removed.

He was removed.

His removal had nothing to do with India. So your comment is worthless.

The only way for him to have stayed was for him to allow Pakistan to continue allowing the corrupt to rule, and basically do nothing, leading to Pakistan's financial ruin much much earlier.
removed by his/your own fauj

and later likely also shot at by a patsy of Pk fauj

ghanta logic, purely feels driven guy, was Mr Khan.. could have done his socialist thing "uplift the poor" blahblah and probably have lived out his term

in the end khud ki establishment + political allies and opponents all kicked him out

images
 
Being a ladies man is one thing. Fathering an illegitimate child, refusing to acknowledge her despite a court order and lying about it in an affidavit is quite another.
I found that aspect of handsome pretty cool tbh, player banda tha.. and a good one, on and of the field.. can't fault him there

also, his appeal among the masses is understandable, cricket hero, philanthropist, good guy.. Mr Khan.. I was always a fan during his playing (cricket) days, legendary all rounder.. cricket credentials ni question kar sakte

just a bad politician, terrible one even.. it is just not a nice man's or gentlemens' game

guy blew it, and has only himself to blame.. he absolutely knew how the pitch and conditions were before he went in but revolutionary type harkatein kar di usne..

rotay rho ab :cry:, but galti uski hi thi.
 
Suppose Pakistani establishment agrees to india, just suppose …. do you think indian military will reduce at least half to its size and forgo the budget?

Okay, let's assume that an agreement between India and Pakistan has resulted in peace in Jammu and Kashmir.

However, we have China to the east, while you have Afghanistan and Iran to the west.

We will quickly turn our attention to China, where there will be a big reduction in the strength of the army. This does not mean that many soldiers will be asked to retire; many army men will be retiring once their terms are up, but it also means that there will be no new bulk openings.

However, we'll continue to maintain the necessary numbers to at least prevent Chinese aggression.

Due to the possibility of a two-front conflict, India currently needs to keep a significant number of troops. If we can normalize one front, our army's strength will be depending on the threat from other front.
 
Okay, let's assume that an agreement between India and Pakistan has resulted in peace in Jammu and Kashmir.

However, we have China to the east, while you have Afghanistan and Iran to the west.

We will quickly turn our attention to China, where there will be a big reduction in the strength of the army. This does not mean that many soldiers will be asked to retire; many army men will be retiring once their terms are up, but it also means that there will be no new bulk openings.

However, we'll continue to maintain the necessary numbers to at least prevent Chinese aggression.

Due to the possibility of a two-front conflict, India currently needs to keep a significant number of troops. If we can normalize one front, our army's strength will be depending on the threat from other front.

That is what you think. What indian military thinks about normalcy is another matter. Wagah pay tangain tum b ussi tarah he uthaty ho.

Being a ladies man is one thing. Fathering an illegitimate child, refusing to acknowledge her despite a court order and lying about it in an affidavit is quite another.


Actually, it is worse. At least Zardari and Patwaris sold their zameer for palaces. Niazi sold it for watches and rugs.

So you are judging IK for perfection in an imperfect world, where even the judiciary itself is involved in daily adultery, are drunk, sellouts and the worst of the corrupts.

I don't think any Pakistani agrees that IK is perfect, but they are willing to ignore his mistakes to get rid of the pure evil.
 
That is what you think. What indian military thinks about normalcy is another matter. Wagah pay tangain tum b ussi tarah he uthaty ho.

I'll give a simple illustration: If the Indian prime minister demanded that our army chief resign or face termination... Nothing will happen in India. He will be removed from his post.

But can you apply the same reasoning to Pakistan?

I wouldn't say that the Indian Army doesn't play a significant role; they are a part of our establishment, but they are not in charge. They typically do as our supreme leader, the PM or President, directs.
 
Last edited:

The same reason why the Pakistani military and PDM hates Imran Khan. He wants to look enemies in the eyes and do things as they should be done.

Notice how Indians are dancing around lately since PDM took power. The Indians are literally celebrating every day as a victory. Did they do the same thing when Imran Khan was in power?
 
The same reason why the Pakistani military and PDM hates Imran Khan. He wants to look enemies in the eyes and do things as they should be done.

Notice how Indians are dancing around lately since PDM took power. The Indians are literally celebrating every day as a victory. Did they do the same thing when Imran Khan was in power?

Indians are doing victory laps right now

Javed Akhtar came to Pakistan 😂
 
Okay, let's assume that an agreement between India and Pakistan has resulted in peace in Jammu and Kashmir.

However, we have China to the east, while you have Afghanistan and Iran to the west.

We will quickly turn our attention to China, where there will be a big reduction in the strength of the army. This does not mean that many soldiers will be asked to retire; many army men will be retiring once their terms are up, but it also means that there will be no new bulk openings.

However, we'll continue to maintain the necessary numbers to at least prevent Chinese aggression.

Due to the possibility of a two-front conflict, India currently needs to keep a significant number of troops. If we can normalize one front, our army's strength will be depending on the threat from other front.
China has their own worries about a "two front war" .. USFK/USFJ/Taiwan .. regular carrier battlegroup deployments and so on..
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom